Cargando…

Point-of-Encounter Assessment: Using Health Belief Model Constructs to Change Grading Behaviors

OBJECTIVE: Fourth-year medical students need feedback to improve. Even during 1-month rotations, there needs to be a formal mid-clerkship feedback session. Better feedback involves multiple surgical evaluators at multiple levels. Constructs from the Health Belief Model of behavior change were used t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McLean, Susan F, Francis, Maureen, Lacy, Naomi L, Alvarado, Andres
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6495437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31069255
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2382120519840358
_version_ 1783415354136985600
author McLean, Susan F
Francis, Maureen
Lacy, Naomi L
Alvarado, Andres
author_facet McLean, Susan F
Francis, Maureen
Lacy, Naomi L
Alvarado, Andres
author_sort McLean, Susan F
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Fourth-year medical students need feedback to improve. Even during 1-month rotations, there needs to be a formal mid-clerkship feedback session. Better feedback involves multiple surgical evaluators at multiple levels. Constructs from the Health Belief Model of behavior change were used to assess faculty and resident grading behaviors to create a more usable evaluation system. A point-of-encounter (POE) system was created. The objective of this study was to review the efficacy of a POE clinical evaluation card (CEC) system which was initiated to increase evaluator’s participation in grading and formative feedback prior to mid-clerkship evaluation. DESIGN: The study was a 1-year retrospective cohort study reviewing the CECs for level of evaluator, content, and student compliance. A Likert-type scale survey regarding the usage of the clinical cards was also completed by evaluators. SETTING: Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center at El Paso, during 2 fourth-year medical student rotations, Subinternship (Sub-I), and Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU). PARTICIPANTS: 34 fourth-year medical students and 20 evaluators. RESULTS: Students turned in a mean of 10 cards, 75% in SICU and 65% in Sub-I turned in all 10 cards. There were significantly greater advanced residents evaluating during Sub-I vs SICU: mean evals by PGY3 were 1.9 vs 0.75 (p = .01) and mean evals by PGY5 were 1.4 vs 0.1 (p < .0001). There were significantly more faculty completing evaluations during SICU vs Sub-I: 2.5 faculty evals/student vs 1.4 faculty evals/student (p = .023). Evaluator ratings were high on a 5-point Likert-type scale, with most responses near the “strongly agree” rating of 4.7 to 4.8. CONCLUSIONS: Use of POE CECs met goals of having at least 7 CECs turned in by mid-clerkship and 10 at end-clerkships. Formative evaluations by mid-clerkship went from 0 to 7 evaluations. Evaluator surveys highlighted clarity and efficiency as reasons for using CECs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6495437
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64954372019-05-08 Point-of-Encounter Assessment: Using Health Belief Model Constructs to Change Grading Behaviors McLean, Susan F Francis, Maureen Lacy, Naomi L Alvarado, Andres J Med Educ Curric Dev Original Research OBJECTIVE: Fourth-year medical students need feedback to improve. Even during 1-month rotations, there needs to be a formal mid-clerkship feedback session. Better feedback involves multiple surgical evaluators at multiple levels. Constructs from the Health Belief Model of behavior change were used to assess faculty and resident grading behaviors to create a more usable evaluation system. A point-of-encounter (POE) system was created. The objective of this study was to review the efficacy of a POE clinical evaluation card (CEC) system which was initiated to increase evaluator’s participation in grading and formative feedback prior to mid-clerkship evaluation. DESIGN: The study was a 1-year retrospective cohort study reviewing the CECs for level of evaluator, content, and student compliance. A Likert-type scale survey regarding the usage of the clinical cards was also completed by evaluators. SETTING: Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center at El Paso, during 2 fourth-year medical student rotations, Subinternship (Sub-I), and Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU). PARTICIPANTS: 34 fourth-year medical students and 20 evaluators. RESULTS: Students turned in a mean of 10 cards, 75% in SICU and 65% in Sub-I turned in all 10 cards. There were significantly greater advanced residents evaluating during Sub-I vs SICU: mean evals by PGY3 were 1.9 vs 0.75 (p = .01) and mean evals by PGY5 were 1.4 vs 0.1 (p < .0001). There were significantly more faculty completing evaluations during SICU vs Sub-I: 2.5 faculty evals/student vs 1.4 faculty evals/student (p = .023). Evaluator ratings were high on a 5-point Likert-type scale, with most responses near the “strongly agree” rating of 4.7 to 4.8. CONCLUSIONS: Use of POE CECs met goals of having at least 7 CECs turned in by mid-clerkship and 10 at end-clerkships. Formative evaluations by mid-clerkship went from 0 to 7 evaluations. Evaluator surveys highlighted clarity and efficiency as reasons for using CECs. SAGE Publications 2019-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6495437/ /pubmed/31069255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2382120519840358 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
McLean, Susan F
Francis, Maureen
Lacy, Naomi L
Alvarado, Andres
Point-of-Encounter Assessment: Using Health Belief Model Constructs to Change Grading Behaviors
title Point-of-Encounter Assessment: Using Health Belief Model Constructs to Change Grading Behaviors
title_full Point-of-Encounter Assessment: Using Health Belief Model Constructs to Change Grading Behaviors
title_fullStr Point-of-Encounter Assessment: Using Health Belief Model Constructs to Change Grading Behaviors
title_full_unstemmed Point-of-Encounter Assessment: Using Health Belief Model Constructs to Change Grading Behaviors
title_short Point-of-Encounter Assessment: Using Health Belief Model Constructs to Change Grading Behaviors
title_sort point-of-encounter assessment: using health belief model constructs to change grading behaviors
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6495437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31069255
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2382120519840358
work_keys_str_mv AT mcleansusanf pointofencounterassessmentusinghealthbeliefmodelconstructstochangegradingbehaviors
AT francismaureen pointofencounterassessmentusinghealthbeliefmodelconstructstochangegradingbehaviors
AT lacynaomil pointofencounterassessmentusinghealthbeliefmodelconstructstochangegradingbehaviors
AT alvaradoandres pointofencounterassessmentusinghealthbeliefmodelconstructstochangegradingbehaviors