Cargando…

Restoration of the Fronto-Orbital Buttress with Primary Bone Fragments

OBJECTIVE: Forehead deformities are often caused by lack of treatment or incorrect restoration of the frontal buttress, so the underlying frontal buttress should be restored to its previous position to ensure that the previous forehead contour is restored in cases of complex depressed skull fracture...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Young Ho, Kang, Dong Hee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Neurotraumatology Society 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6495582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31098344
http://dx.doi.org/10.13004/kjnt.2019.15.e12
_version_ 1783415365932417024
author Kim, Young Ho
Kang, Dong Hee
author_facet Kim, Young Ho
Kang, Dong Hee
author_sort Kim, Young Ho
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Forehead deformities are often caused by lack of treatment or incorrect restoration of the frontal buttress, so the underlying frontal buttress should be restored to its previous position to ensure that the previous forehead contour is restored in cases of complex depressed skull fractures. However, since brain injuries from skull fractures could have fatal consequences, the clinical concern in primary surgery has been to save the patient's life, and cosmetic concerns have always been secondary. We retrospectively reviewed fronto-orbital fracture patients who underwent primary restoration with primary bone fragments or an alloplastic implant and compared the surgical outcomes of autologous bone (group 1) and artificial materials (group 2). METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of 47 patients with fronto-orbital fractures between March 2012 and January 2018. The patients underwent primary reconstruction with primary bone fragments or an alloplastic implant. The surgical results were evaluated by the incidence of infection and cosmetic satisfaction of patients. RESULTS: Infections occurred in one patient (5%) in group 1 and in two patients (15.3%) in group 2, which was not a statistically significant difference. In contrast, at 6 months after surgery, patient satisfaction showed a statistically significant between-group difference (group 1: 4.32 points, group 2: 3.54 points, p=0.001). CONCLUSION: Primary reconstruction using fractured bone fragments is an effective and preferable method that could result in better surgical outcomes than restoration using an alloplastic implant.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6495582
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Korean Neurotraumatology Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64955822019-05-16 Restoration of the Fronto-Orbital Buttress with Primary Bone Fragments Kim, Young Ho Kang, Dong Hee Korean J Neurotrauma Clinical Article OBJECTIVE: Forehead deformities are often caused by lack of treatment or incorrect restoration of the frontal buttress, so the underlying frontal buttress should be restored to its previous position to ensure that the previous forehead contour is restored in cases of complex depressed skull fractures. However, since brain injuries from skull fractures could have fatal consequences, the clinical concern in primary surgery has been to save the patient's life, and cosmetic concerns have always been secondary. We retrospectively reviewed fronto-orbital fracture patients who underwent primary restoration with primary bone fragments or an alloplastic implant and compared the surgical outcomes of autologous bone (group 1) and artificial materials (group 2). METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of 47 patients with fronto-orbital fractures between March 2012 and January 2018. The patients underwent primary reconstruction with primary bone fragments or an alloplastic implant. The surgical results were evaluated by the incidence of infection and cosmetic satisfaction of patients. RESULTS: Infections occurred in one patient (5%) in group 1 and in two patients (15.3%) in group 2, which was not a statistically significant difference. In contrast, at 6 months after surgery, patient satisfaction showed a statistically significant between-group difference (group 1: 4.32 points, group 2: 3.54 points, p=0.001). CONCLUSION: Primary reconstruction using fractured bone fragments is an effective and preferable method that could result in better surgical outcomes than restoration using an alloplastic implant. Korean Neurotraumatology Society 2019-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6495582/ /pubmed/31098344 http://dx.doi.org/10.13004/kjnt.2019.15.e12 Text en Copyright © 2019 Korean Neurotraumatology Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Article
Kim, Young Ho
Kang, Dong Hee
Restoration of the Fronto-Orbital Buttress with Primary Bone Fragments
title Restoration of the Fronto-Orbital Buttress with Primary Bone Fragments
title_full Restoration of the Fronto-Orbital Buttress with Primary Bone Fragments
title_fullStr Restoration of the Fronto-Orbital Buttress with Primary Bone Fragments
title_full_unstemmed Restoration of the Fronto-Orbital Buttress with Primary Bone Fragments
title_short Restoration of the Fronto-Orbital Buttress with Primary Bone Fragments
title_sort restoration of the fronto-orbital buttress with primary bone fragments
topic Clinical Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6495582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31098344
http://dx.doi.org/10.13004/kjnt.2019.15.e12
work_keys_str_mv AT kimyoungho restorationofthefrontoorbitalbuttresswithprimarybonefragments
AT kangdonghee restorationofthefrontoorbitalbuttresswithprimarybonefragments