Cargando…

Sensitization profile in patients with respiratory allergic diseases: differences between conventional and molecular diagnosis (a cross-sectional study)

BACKGROUND: Component-resolved diagnosis (CRD) allows to identify single molecular allergen components, and constitutes a routine practice in many allergy units. However, skin prick test (SPT) remains the technique of choice in many otorhinolaryngology departments, thus increasing the risk of using...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Til-Pérez, Guillermo, Carnevale, Claudio, Sarría-Echegaray, Pedro Luis, Arancibia-Tagle, Diego, Chugo-Gordillo, Sendy, Tomás-Barberán, Manuel David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6495638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31068762
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12948-019-0112-4
_version_ 1783415375472361472
author Til-Pérez, Guillermo
Carnevale, Claudio
Sarría-Echegaray, Pedro Luis
Arancibia-Tagle, Diego
Chugo-Gordillo, Sendy
Tomás-Barberán, Manuel David
author_facet Til-Pérez, Guillermo
Carnevale, Claudio
Sarría-Echegaray, Pedro Luis
Arancibia-Tagle, Diego
Chugo-Gordillo, Sendy
Tomás-Barberán, Manuel David
author_sort Til-Pérez, Guillermo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Component-resolved diagnosis (CRD) allows to identify single molecular allergen components, and constitutes a routine practice in many allergy units. However, skin prick test (SPT) remains the technique of choice in many otorhinolaryngology departments, thus increasing the risk of using inadequate immunotherapies in patients with respiratory allergies. This study aimed to compare sensitization profiles determined by SPT and CRD in patients with respiratory allergy, and to explore the relationship between sensitization and type and severity of the respiratory disease. METHODS: Cross-sectional, multicenter study of patients admitted to the Otorhinolaryngology Department due to symptoms of respiratory allergy. Extracts from various house dust mites, pollens, and molds were tested by SPT, whereas IgE against the corresponding antigens were measured by CRD. RESULTS: The analysis included 101 patients. The sensitization profile obtained by SPT had low agreement with that of CRD, particularly to dust mite allergens (Dermatophagoides sp.) and pollens (Plantago lanceolata, Olea europaea, and Cupressus sempervirens). While SPT did not show any significant relationship between sensitization and type/severity of the respiratory disease, CRD allowed to associate Der p 1, Der f 1 and Lep d 2 sensitizations with asthma, and Der p 2, Der f 2 and Lep d 2 sensitizations with more severe symptoms of allergic rhinitis. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with SPT, CRD enables to describe a more accurate sensitization profile and to identify associations between symptoms and specific antigens. The routine use of CRD in an otorhinolaryngology setting may benefit the management of patients with respiratory allergy. Trial registration IB 3108/15 (Retrospectively registered) ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12948-019-0112-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6495638
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64956382019-05-08 Sensitization profile in patients with respiratory allergic diseases: differences between conventional and molecular diagnosis (a cross-sectional study) Til-Pérez, Guillermo Carnevale, Claudio Sarría-Echegaray, Pedro Luis Arancibia-Tagle, Diego Chugo-Gordillo, Sendy Tomás-Barberán, Manuel David Clin Mol Allergy Research BACKGROUND: Component-resolved diagnosis (CRD) allows to identify single molecular allergen components, and constitutes a routine practice in many allergy units. However, skin prick test (SPT) remains the technique of choice in many otorhinolaryngology departments, thus increasing the risk of using inadequate immunotherapies in patients with respiratory allergies. This study aimed to compare sensitization profiles determined by SPT and CRD in patients with respiratory allergy, and to explore the relationship between sensitization and type and severity of the respiratory disease. METHODS: Cross-sectional, multicenter study of patients admitted to the Otorhinolaryngology Department due to symptoms of respiratory allergy. Extracts from various house dust mites, pollens, and molds were tested by SPT, whereas IgE against the corresponding antigens were measured by CRD. RESULTS: The analysis included 101 patients. The sensitization profile obtained by SPT had low agreement with that of CRD, particularly to dust mite allergens (Dermatophagoides sp.) and pollens (Plantago lanceolata, Olea europaea, and Cupressus sempervirens). While SPT did not show any significant relationship between sensitization and type/severity of the respiratory disease, CRD allowed to associate Der p 1, Der f 1 and Lep d 2 sensitizations with asthma, and Der p 2, Der f 2 and Lep d 2 sensitizations with more severe symptoms of allergic rhinitis. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with SPT, CRD enables to describe a more accurate sensitization profile and to identify associations between symptoms and specific antigens. The routine use of CRD in an otorhinolaryngology setting may benefit the management of patients with respiratory allergy. Trial registration IB 3108/15 (Retrospectively registered) ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12948-019-0112-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6495638/ /pubmed/31068762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12948-019-0112-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Til-Pérez, Guillermo
Carnevale, Claudio
Sarría-Echegaray, Pedro Luis
Arancibia-Tagle, Diego
Chugo-Gordillo, Sendy
Tomás-Barberán, Manuel David
Sensitization profile in patients with respiratory allergic diseases: differences between conventional and molecular diagnosis (a cross-sectional study)
title Sensitization profile in patients with respiratory allergic diseases: differences between conventional and molecular diagnosis (a cross-sectional study)
title_full Sensitization profile in patients with respiratory allergic diseases: differences between conventional and molecular diagnosis (a cross-sectional study)
title_fullStr Sensitization profile in patients with respiratory allergic diseases: differences between conventional and molecular diagnosis (a cross-sectional study)
title_full_unstemmed Sensitization profile in patients with respiratory allergic diseases: differences between conventional and molecular diagnosis (a cross-sectional study)
title_short Sensitization profile in patients with respiratory allergic diseases: differences between conventional and molecular diagnosis (a cross-sectional study)
title_sort sensitization profile in patients with respiratory allergic diseases: differences between conventional and molecular diagnosis (a cross-sectional study)
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6495638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31068762
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12948-019-0112-4
work_keys_str_mv AT tilperezguillermo sensitizationprofileinpatientswithrespiratoryallergicdiseasesdifferencesbetweenconventionalandmoleculardiagnosisacrosssectionalstudy
AT carnevaleclaudio sensitizationprofileinpatientswithrespiratoryallergicdiseasesdifferencesbetweenconventionalandmoleculardiagnosisacrosssectionalstudy
AT sarriaechegaraypedroluis sensitizationprofileinpatientswithrespiratoryallergicdiseasesdifferencesbetweenconventionalandmoleculardiagnosisacrosssectionalstudy
AT arancibiataglediego sensitizationprofileinpatientswithrespiratoryallergicdiseasesdifferencesbetweenconventionalandmoleculardiagnosisacrosssectionalstudy
AT chugogordillosendy sensitizationprofileinpatientswithrespiratoryallergicdiseasesdifferencesbetweenconventionalandmoleculardiagnosisacrosssectionalstudy
AT tomasbarberanmanueldavid sensitizationprofileinpatientswithrespiratoryallergicdiseasesdifferencesbetweenconventionalandmoleculardiagnosisacrosssectionalstudy