Cargando…
Assessing acceptance of electric automated vehicles after exposure in a realistic traffic environment
After years of hypothetical surveys and simulator studies, automated vehicles (AVs) are now being tested in realistic traffic environments adding validity to knowledge about their acceptance. We present data from a pilot test with participants (n = 125) after experiencing a ride in an electric AV on...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6497263/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31048877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215969 |
_version_ | 1783415438402650112 |
---|---|
author | Zoellick, Jan C. Kuhlmey, Adelheid Schenk, Liane Schindel, Daniel Blüher, Stefan |
author_facet | Zoellick, Jan C. Kuhlmey, Adelheid Schenk, Liane Schindel, Daniel Blüher, Stefan |
author_sort | Zoellick, Jan C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | After years of hypothetical surveys and simulator studies, automated vehicles (AVs) are now being tested in realistic traffic environments adding validity to knowledge about their acceptance. We present data from a pilot test with participants (n = 125) after experiencing a ride in an electric AV on a large clinic area in Berlin, Germany. As a first contribution, we bridge the gap between missing definitions of key constructs, confusion about their operationalisations, and a rigorous test of their statistical properties and data structure by examining scales on acceptance, trust, perceived safety, intention to use, and—for the first time applied to AVs—the emotions amusement, fear, surprise, and boredom. Tests of reliability and normality were satisfying for almost all constructs (Cronbach’s alphas ≥ .69; six of eight scales normally distributed). The vehicles were accepted (M = 1.22; SD = 0.70; range -2 to 2), trusted (M = 3.29; SD = 0.81; range 1 to 5), and perceived as safe (M = 3.29; SD = 1.03; range 1 to 5). However, factor analyses did not reflect the hypothesised data structure, and validity concerns question the suitability of some constructs for attitude assessment of electric AVs. Our open item for comments added valuable insights in qualitative aspects of user attitudes towards electric AVs regarding driving style, technical features, and (unsettling) audio-visual feedback. We thus argue for broader conceptualisations of key constructs based on interdisciplinary exchange and multi-methodical study designs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6497263 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64972632019-05-17 Assessing acceptance of electric automated vehicles after exposure in a realistic traffic environment Zoellick, Jan C. Kuhlmey, Adelheid Schenk, Liane Schindel, Daniel Blüher, Stefan PLoS One Research Article After years of hypothetical surveys and simulator studies, automated vehicles (AVs) are now being tested in realistic traffic environments adding validity to knowledge about their acceptance. We present data from a pilot test with participants (n = 125) after experiencing a ride in an electric AV on a large clinic area in Berlin, Germany. As a first contribution, we bridge the gap between missing definitions of key constructs, confusion about their operationalisations, and a rigorous test of their statistical properties and data structure by examining scales on acceptance, trust, perceived safety, intention to use, and—for the first time applied to AVs—the emotions amusement, fear, surprise, and boredom. Tests of reliability and normality were satisfying for almost all constructs (Cronbach’s alphas ≥ .69; six of eight scales normally distributed). The vehicles were accepted (M = 1.22; SD = 0.70; range -2 to 2), trusted (M = 3.29; SD = 0.81; range 1 to 5), and perceived as safe (M = 3.29; SD = 1.03; range 1 to 5). However, factor analyses did not reflect the hypothesised data structure, and validity concerns question the suitability of some constructs for attitude assessment of electric AVs. Our open item for comments added valuable insights in qualitative aspects of user attitudes towards electric AVs regarding driving style, technical features, and (unsettling) audio-visual feedback. We thus argue for broader conceptualisations of key constructs based on interdisciplinary exchange and multi-methodical study designs. Public Library of Science 2019-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6497263/ /pubmed/31048877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215969 Text en © 2019 Zoellick et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zoellick, Jan C. Kuhlmey, Adelheid Schenk, Liane Schindel, Daniel Blüher, Stefan Assessing acceptance of electric automated vehicles after exposure in a realistic traffic environment |
title | Assessing acceptance of electric automated vehicles after exposure in a realistic traffic environment |
title_full | Assessing acceptance of electric automated vehicles after exposure in a realistic traffic environment |
title_fullStr | Assessing acceptance of electric automated vehicles after exposure in a realistic traffic environment |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing acceptance of electric automated vehicles after exposure in a realistic traffic environment |
title_short | Assessing acceptance of electric automated vehicles after exposure in a realistic traffic environment |
title_sort | assessing acceptance of electric automated vehicles after exposure in a realistic traffic environment |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6497263/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31048877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215969 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zoellickjanc assessingacceptanceofelectricautomatedvehiclesafterexposureinarealistictrafficenvironment AT kuhlmeyadelheid assessingacceptanceofelectricautomatedvehiclesafterexposureinarealistictrafficenvironment AT schenkliane assessingacceptanceofelectricautomatedvehiclesafterexposureinarealistictrafficenvironment AT schindeldaniel assessingacceptanceofelectricautomatedvehiclesafterexposureinarealistictrafficenvironment AT bluherstefan assessingacceptanceofelectricautomatedvehiclesafterexposureinarealistictrafficenvironment |