Cargando…

Assessing acceptance of electric automated vehicles after exposure in a realistic traffic environment

After years of hypothetical surveys and simulator studies, automated vehicles (AVs) are now being tested in realistic traffic environments adding validity to knowledge about their acceptance. We present data from a pilot test with participants (n = 125) after experiencing a ride in an electric AV on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zoellick, Jan C., Kuhlmey, Adelheid, Schenk, Liane, Schindel, Daniel, Blüher, Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6497263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31048877
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215969
_version_ 1783415438402650112
author Zoellick, Jan C.
Kuhlmey, Adelheid
Schenk, Liane
Schindel, Daniel
Blüher, Stefan
author_facet Zoellick, Jan C.
Kuhlmey, Adelheid
Schenk, Liane
Schindel, Daniel
Blüher, Stefan
author_sort Zoellick, Jan C.
collection PubMed
description After years of hypothetical surveys and simulator studies, automated vehicles (AVs) are now being tested in realistic traffic environments adding validity to knowledge about their acceptance. We present data from a pilot test with participants (n = 125) after experiencing a ride in an electric AV on a large clinic area in Berlin, Germany. As a first contribution, we bridge the gap between missing definitions of key constructs, confusion about their operationalisations, and a rigorous test of their statistical properties and data structure by examining scales on acceptance, trust, perceived safety, intention to use, and—for the first time applied to AVs—the emotions amusement, fear, surprise, and boredom. Tests of reliability and normality were satisfying for almost all constructs (Cronbach’s alphas ≥ .69; six of eight scales normally distributed). The vehicles were accepted (M = 1.22; SD = 0.70; range -2 to 2), trusted (M = 3.29; SD = 0.81; range 1 to 5), and perceived as safe (M = 3.29; SD = 1.03; range 1 to 5). However, factor analyses did not reflect the hypothesised data structure, and validity concerns question the suitability of some constructs for attitude assessment of electric AVs. Our open item for comments added valuable insights in qualitative aspects of user attitudes towards electric AVs regarding driving style, technical features, and (unsettling) audio-visual feedback. We thus argue for broader conceptualisations of key constructs based on interdisciplinary exchange and multi-methodical study designs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6497263
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64972632019-05-17 Assessing acceptance of electric automated vehicles after exposure in a realistic traffic environment Zoellick, Jan C. Kuhlmey, Adelheid Schenk, Liane Schindel, Daniel Blüher, Stefan PLoS One Research Article After years of hypothetical surveys and simulator studies, automated vehicles (AVs) are now being tested in realistic traffic environments adding validity to knowledge about their acceptance. We present data from a pilot test with participants (n = 125) after experiencing a ride in an electric AV on a large clinic area in Berlin, Germany. As a first contribution, we bridge the gap between missing definitions of key constructs, confusion about their operationalisations, and a rigorous test of their statistical properties and data structure by examining scales on acceptance, trust, perceived safety, intention to use, and—for the first time applied to AVs—the emotions amusement, fear, surprise, and boredom. Tests of reliability and normality were satisfying for almost all constructs (Cronbach’s alphas ≥ .69; six of eight scales normally distributed). The vehicles were accepted (M = 1.22; SD = 0.70; range -2 to 2), trusted (M = 3.29; SD = 0.81; range 1 to 5), and perceived as safe (M = 3.29; SD = 1.03; range 1 to 5). However, factor analyses did not reflect the hypothesised data structure, and validity concerns question the suitability of some constructs for attitude assessment of electric AVs. Our open item for comments added valuable insights in qualitative aspects of user attitudes towards electric AVs regarding driving style, technical features, and (unsettling) audio-visual feedback. We thus argue for broader conceptualisations of key constructs based on interdisciplinary exchange and multi-methodical study designs. Public Library of Science 2019-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6497263/ /pubmed/31048877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215969 Text en © 2019 Zoellick et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zoellick, Jan C.
Kuhlmey, Adelheid
Schenk, Liane
Schindel, Daniel
Blüher, Stefan
Assessing acceptance of electric automated vehicles after exposure in a realistic traffic environment
title Assessing acceptance of electric automated vehicles after exposure in a realistic traffic environment
title_full Assessing acceptance of electric automated vehicles after exposure in a realistic traffic environment
title_fullStr Assessing acceptance of electric automated vehicles after exposure in a realistic traffic environment
title_full_unstemmed Assessing acceptance of electric automated vehicles after exposure in a realistic traffic environment
title_short Assessing acceptance of electric automated vehicles after exposure in a realistic traffic environment
title_sort assessing acceptance of electric automated vehicles after exposure in a realistic traffic environment
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6497263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31048877
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215969
work_keys_str_mv AT zoellickjanc assessingacceptanceofelectricautomatedvehiclesafterexposureinarealistictrafficenvironment
AT kuhlmeyadelheid assessingacceptanceofelectricautomatedvehiclesafterexposureinarealistictrafficenvironment
AT schenkliane assessingacceptanceofelectricautomatedvehiclesafterexposureinarealistictrafficenvironment
AT schindeldaniel assessingacceptanceofelectricautomatedvehiclesafterexposureinarealistictrafficenvironment
AT bluherstefan assessingacceptanceofelectricautomatedvehiclesafterexposureinarealistictrafficenvironment