Cargando…
Sex Differences in Acute Complications of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: Implications for Patient Safety
BACKGROUND: To date, limited population‐level studies have examined the impact of sex on the acute complications of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED), including permanent pacemakers, implantable cardioverter defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices. METHODS AND RESUL...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6497358/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30648465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.010869 |
_version_ | 1783415460787650560 |
---|---|
author | Moore, Katherine Ganesan, Anand Labrosciano, Clementine Heddle, William McGavigan, Andrew Hossain, Sadia Horton, Dennis Hariharaputhiran, Saranya Ranasinghe, Isuru |
author_facet | Moore, Katherine Ganesan, Anand Labrosciano, Clementine Heddle, William McGavigan, Andrew Hossain, Sadia Horton, Dennis Hariharaputhiran, Saranya Ranasinghe, Isuru |
author_sort | Moore, Katherine |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To date, limited population‐level studies have examined the impact of sex on the acute complications of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED), including permanent pacemakers, implantable cardioverter defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied all patients aged >18 years from 2010 to 2015 who were a resident of Australia or New Zealand, undergoing a new permanent pacemaker, implantable cardioverter defibrillator, or cardiac resynchronization therapy implant. Standardized variables were collected including patient demographic characteristics, primary and secondary diagnoses, procedures performed and discharge status. Diagnoses and procedures were coded as per the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD‐10) and the Australian Classification of Health Interventions. The primary end point was the incidence of major CIED‐related complications in‐hospital or within 90 days of discharge, with the effect of sex evaluated using multiple logistic regression. A total of 81 304 new CIED (61 658 permanent pacemakers, 12 097 implantable cardioverter defibrillators, 7574 cardiac resynchronization therapy) implants were included (38% women). Overall, 8.5% of women and 8.0% of men experienced a CIED complication (P=0.008). Differences between women and men remained significant after adjustment for age, procedural acuity, and comorbidities (odds ratio 1.10, 95% CI: 1.04–1.16, P<0.001). Differences in CIED complication rates were primarily driven by excess rate of in‐hospital pleural drainage (1.2% women versus 0.6% men, P<0.001; adjusted odds ratio 1.86, 95% CI: 1.59–2.17, P<0.001) and pericardial drainage (0.3% women versus 0.1% men, P<0.001; adjusted odds ratio 2.17, 95% CI: 1.48–3.18, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Women are at higher risk of acute CIED complications. Improvements in implant technique and technologies are required to minimize the risk of implant‐related complications in women. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6497358 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64973582019-05-07 Sex Differences in Acute Complications of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: Implications for Patient Safety Moore, Katherine Ganesan, Anand Labrosciano, Clementine Heddle, William McGavigan, Andrew Hossain, Sadia Horton, Dennis Hariharaputhiran, Saranya Ranasinghe, Isuru J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: To date, limited population‐level studies have examined the impact of sex on the acute complications of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED), including permanent pacemakers, implantable cardioverter defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied all patients aged >18 years from 2010 to 2015 who were a resident of Australia or New Zealand, undergoing a new permanent pacemaker, implantable cardioverter defibrillator, or cardiac resynchronization therapy implant. Standardized variables were collected including patient demographic characteristics, primary and secondary diagnoses, procedures performed and discharge status. Diagnoses and procedures were coded as per the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD‐10) and the Australian Classification of Health Interventions. The primary end point was the incidence of major CIED‐related complications in‐hospital or within 90 days of discharge, with the effect of sex evaluated using multiple logistic regression. A total of 81 304 new CIED (61 658 permanent pacemakers, 12 097 implantable cardioverter defibrillators, 7574 cardiac resynchronization therapy) implants were included (38% women). Overall, 8.5% of women and 8.0% of men experienced a CIED complication (P=0.008). Differences between women and men remained significant after adjustment for age, procedural acuity, and comorbidities (odds ratio 1.10, 95% CI: 1.04–1.16, P<0.001). Differences in CIED complication rates were primarily driven by excess rate of in‐hospital pleural drainage (1.2% women versus 0.6% men, P<0.001; adjusted odds ratio 1.86, 95% CI: 1.59–2.17, P<0.001) and pericardial drainage (0.3% women versus 0.1% men, P<0.001; adjusted odds ratio 2.17, 95% CI: 1.48–3.18, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Women are at higher risk of acute CIED complications. Improvements in implant technique and technologies are required to minimize the risk of implant‐related complications in women. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6497358/ /pubmed/30648465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.010869 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Moore, Katherine Ganesan, Anand Labrosciano, Clementine Heddle, William McGavigan, Andrew Hossain, Sadia Horton, Dennis Hariharaputhiran, Saranya Ranasinghe, Isuru Sex Differences in Acute Complications of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: Implications for Patient Safety |
title | Sex Differences in Acute Complications of Cardiac
Implantable Electronic Devices: Implications for Patient Safety |
title_full | Sex Differences in Acute Complications of Cardiac
Implantable Electronic Devices: Implications for Patient Safety |
title_fullStr | Sex Differences in Acute Complications of Cardiac
Implantable Electronic Devices: Implications for Patient Safety |
title_full_unstemmed | Sex Differences in Acute Complications of Cardiac
Implantable Electronic Devices: Implications for Patient Safety |
title_short | Sex Differences in Acute Complications of Cardiac
Implantable Electronic Devices: Implications for Patient Safety |
title_sort | sex differences in acute complications of cardiac
implantable electronic devices: implications for patient safety |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6497358/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30648465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.010869 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moorekatherine sexdifferencesinacutecomplicationsofcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesimplicationsforpatientsafety AT ganesananand sexdifferencesinacutecomplicationsofcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesimplicationsforpatientsafety AT labroscianoclementine sexdifferencesinacutecomplicationsofcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesimplicationsforpatientsafety AT heddlewilliam sexdifferencesinacutecomplicationsofcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesimplicationsforpatientsafety AT mcgaviganandrew sexdifferencesinacutecomplicationsofcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesimplicationsforpatientsafety AT hossainsadia sexdifferencesinacutecomplicationsofcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesimplicationsforpatientsafety AT hortondennis sexdifferencesinacutecomplicationsofcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesimplicationsforpatientsafety AT hariharaputhiransaranya sexdifferencesinacutecomplicationsofcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesimplicationsforpatientsafety AT ranasingheisuru sexdifferencesinacutecomplicationsofcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesimplicationsforpatientsafety |