Cargando…

Sex Differences in Acute Complications of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: Implications for Patient Safety

BACKGROUND: To date, limited population‐level studies have examined the impact of sex on the acute complications of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED), including permanent pacemakers, implantable cardioverter defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices. METHODS AND RESUL...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moore, Katherine, Ganesan, Anand, Labrosciano, Clementine, Heddle, William, McGavigan, Andrew, Hossain, Sadia, Horton, Dennis, Hariharaputhiran, Saranya, Ranasinghe, Isuru
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6497358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30648465
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.010869
_version_ 1783415460787650560
author Moore, Katherine
Ganesan, Anand
Labrosciano, Clementine
Heddle, William
McGavigan, Andrew
Hossain, Sadia
Horton, Dennis
Hariharaputhiran, Saranya
Ranasinghe, Isuru
author_facet Moore, Katherine
Ganesan, Anand
Labrosciano, Clementine
Heddle, William
McGavigan, Andrew
Hossain, Sadia
Horton, Dennis
Hariharaputhiran, Saranya
Ranasinghe, Isuru
author_sort Moore, Katherine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To date, limited population‐level studies have examined the impact of sex on the acute complications of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED), including permanent pacemakers, implantable cardioverter defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied all patients aged >18 years from 2010 to 2015 who were a resident of Australia or New Zealand, undergoing a new permanent pacemaker, implantable cardioverter defibrillator, or cardiac resynchronization therapy implant. Standardized variables were collected including patient demographic characteristics, primary and secondary diagnoses, procedures performed and discharge status. Diagnoses and procedures were coded as per the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD‐10) and the Australian Classification of Health Interventions. The primary end point was the incidence of major CIED‐related complications in‐hospital or within 90 days of discharge, with the effect of sex evaluated using multiple logistic regression. A total of 81 304 new CIED (61 658 permanent pacemakers, 12 097 implantable cardioverter defibrillators, 7574 cardiac resynchronization therapy) implants were included (38% women). Overall, 8.5% of women and 8.0% of men experienced a CIED complication (P=0.008). Differences between women and men remained significant after adjustment for age, procedural acuity, and comorbidities (odds ratio 1.10, 95% CI: 1.04–1.16, P<0.001). Differences in CIED complication rates were primarily driven by excess rate of in‐hospital pleural drainage (1.2% women versus 0.6% men, P<0.001; adjusted odds ratio 1.86, 95% CI: 1.59–2.17, P<0.001) and pericardial drainage (0.3% women versus 0.1% men, P<0.001; adjusted odds ratio 2.17, 95% CI: 1.48–3.18, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Women are at higher risk of acute CIED complications. Improvements in implant technique and technologies are required to minimize the risk of implant‐related complications in women.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6497358
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64973582019-05-07 Sex Differences in Acute Complications of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: Implications for Patient Safety Moore, Katherine Ganesan, Anand Labrosciano, Clementine Heddle, William McGavigan, Andrew Hossain, Sadia Horton, Dennis Hariharaputhiran, Saranya Ranasinghe, Isuru J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: To date, limited population‐level studies have examined the impact of sex on the acute complications of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED), including permanent pacemakers, implantable cardioverter defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied all patients aged >18 years from 2010 to 2015 who were a resident of Australia or New Zealand, undergoing a new permanent pacemaker, implantable cardioverter defibrillator, or cardiac resynchronization therapy implant. Standardized variables were collected including patient demographic characteristics, primary and secondary diagnoses, procedures performed and discharge status. Diagnoses and procedures were coded as per the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD‐10) and the Australian Classification of Health Interventions. The primary end point was the incidence of major CIED‐related complications in‐hospital or within 90 days of discharge, with the effect of sex evaluated using multiple logistic regression. A total of 81 304 new CIED (61 658 permanent pacemakers, 12 097 implantable cardioverter defibrillators, 7574 cardiac resynchronization therapy) implants were included (38% women). Overall, 8.5% of women and 8.0% of men experienced a CIED complication (P=0.008). Differences between women and men remained significant after adjustment for age, procedural acuity, and comorbidities (odds ratio 1.10, 95% CI: 1.04–1.16, P<0.001). Differences in CIED complication rates were primarily driven by excess rate of in‐hospital pleural drainage (1.2% women versus 0.6% men, P<0.001; adjusted odds ratio 1.86, 95% CI: 1.59–2.17, P<0.001) and pericardial drainage (0.3% women versus 0.1% men, P<0.001; adjusted odds ratio 2.17, 95% CI: 1.48–3.18, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Women are at higher risk of acute CIED complications. Improvements in implant technique and technologies are required to minimize the risk of implant‐related complications in women. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6497358/ /pubmed/30648465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.010869 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Moore, Katherine
Ganesan, Anand
Labrosciano, Clementine
Heddle, William
McGavigan, Andrew
Hossain, Sadia
Horton, Dennis
Hariharaputhiran, Saranya
Ranasinghe, Isuru
Sex Differences in Acute Complications of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: Implications for Patient Safety
title Sex Differences in Acute Complications of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: Implications for Patient Safety
title_full Sex Differences in Acute Complications of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: Implications for Patient Safety
title_fullStr Sex Differences in Acute Complications of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: Implications for Patient Safety
title_full_unstemmed Sex Differences in Acute Complications of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: Implications for Patient Safety
title_short Sex Differences in Acute Complications of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: Implications for Patient Safety
title_sort sex differences in acute complications of cardiac implantable electronic devices: implications for patient safety
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6497358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30648465
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.010869
work_keys_str_mv AT moorekatherine sexdifferencesinacutecomplicationsofcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesimplicationsforpatientsafety
AT ganesananand sexdifferencesinacutecomplicationsofcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesimplicationsforpatientsafety
AT labroscianoclementine sexdifferencesinacutecomplicationsofcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesimplicationsforpatientsafety
AT heddlewilliam sexdifferencesinacutecomplicationsofcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesimplicationsforpatientsafety
AT mcgaviganandrew sexdifferencesinacutecomplicationsofcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesimplicationsforpatientsafety
AT hossainsadia sexdifferencesinacutecomplicationsofcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesimplicationsforpatientsafety
AT hortondennis sexdifferencesinacutecomplicationsofcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesimplicationsforpatientsafety
AT hariharaputhiransaranya sexdifferencesinacutecomplicationsofcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesimplicationsforpatientsafety
AT ranasingheisuru sexdifferencesinacutecomplicationsofcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesimplicationsforpatientsafety