Cargando…

Plasma RANKL levels are not associated with breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers

BACKGROUND: Aberrant progesterone/receptor activator of nuclear factor κβ (RANK) signaling has been implicated in BRCA1 breast cancer development. Furthermore, lower circulating RANKL has been reported among women with a BRCA mutation compared to non-carriers; however, there have been no reports of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zaman, Tasnim, Sun, Ping, Narod, Steven A., Salmena, Leonardo, Kotsopoulos, Joanne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6497430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31069010
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.26810
_version_ 1783415469918650368
author Zaman, Tasnim
Sun, Ping
Narod, Steven A.
Salmena, Leonardo
Kotsopoulos, Joanne
author_facet Zaman, Tasnim
Sun, Ping
Narod, Steven A.
Salmena, Leonardo
Kotsopoulos, Joanne
author_sort Zaman, Tasnim
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Aberrant progesterone/receptor activator of nuclear factor κβ (RANK) signaling has been implicated in BRCA1 breast cancer development. Furthermore, lower circulating RANKL has been reported among women with a BRCA mutation compared to non-carriers; however, there have been no reports of plasma RANKL levels and subsequent breast cancer risk. We prospectively evaluated the relationship between plasma RANKL and breast cancer risk among women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. METHODS: An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to quantify plasma RANKL levels in 184 BRCA mutation carriers. Women were stratified into high vs. low RANKL based on the median levels of the cohort (5.24 pg/ml). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to estimate the cumulative incidence of breast cancer by baseline plasma RANKL and cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between plasma RANKL and risk. RESULTS: Over a mean follow-up of 6.3 years (0.02-19.24), 15 incident breast cancers were identified. The eight-year cumulative incidence was 10% in the low RANKL group and 12% in the high RANKL group (P-log-rank = 0.85). There was no significant association between plasma RANKL levels and breast cancer risk (multivariate HR high vs. low = 1.06; 95%CI 0.34-3.28; P-trend = 0.86). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that circulating RANKL levels are not associated with breast cancer among BRCA mutation carriers. Pending validation in a larger sample, these findings suggest that RANKL is likely not a biomarker of breast cancer risk among BRCA mutation carriers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6497430
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64974302019-05-08 Plasma RANKL levels are not associated with breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers Zaman, Tasnim Sun, Ping Narod, Steven A. Salmena, Leonardo Kotsopoulos, Joanne Oncotarget Research Paper BACKGROUND: Aberrant progesterone/receptor activator of nuclear factor κβ (RANK) signaling has been implicated in BRCA1 breast cancer development. Furthermore, lower circulating RANKL has been reported among women with a BRCA mutation compared to non-carriers; however, there have been no reports of plasma RANKL levels and subsequent breast cancer risk. We prospectively evaluated the relationship between plasma RANKL and breast cancer risk among women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. METHODS: An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to quantify plasma RANKL levels in 184 BRCA mutation carriers. Women were stratified into high vs. low RANKL based on the median levels of the cohort (5.24 pg/ml). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to estimate the cumulative incidence of breast cancer by baseline plasma RANKL and cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between plasma RANKL and risk. RESULTS: Over a mean follow-up of 6.3 years (0.02-19.24), 15 incident breast cancers were identified. The eight-year cumulative incidence was 10% in the low RANKL group and 12% in the high RANKL group (P-log-rank = 0.85). There was no significant association between plasma RANKL levels and breast cancer risk (multivariate HR high vs. low = 1.06; 95%CI 0.34-3.28; P-trend = 0.86). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that circulating RANKL levels are not associated with breast cancer among BRCA mutation carriers. Pending validation in a larger sample, these findings suggest that RANKL is likely not a biomarker of breast cancer risk among BRCA mutation carriers. Impact Journals LLC 2019-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6497430/ /pubmed/31069010 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.26810 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Zaman et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) 3.0 (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Zaman, Tasnim
Sun, Ping
Narod, Steven A.
Salmena, Leonardo
Kotsopoulos, Joanne
Plasma RANKL levels are not associated with breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers
title Plasma RANKL levels are not associated with breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers
title_full Plasma RANKL levels are not associated with breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers
title_fullStr Plasma RANKL levels are not associated with breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers
title_full_unstemmed Plasma RANKL levels are not associated with breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers
title_short Plasma RANKL levels are not associated with breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers
title_sort plasma rankl levels are not associated with breast cancer risk in brca1 and brca2 mutation carriers
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6497430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31069010
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.26810
work_keys_str_mv AT zamantasnim plasmarankllevelsarenotassociatedwithbreastcancerriskinbrca1andbrca2mutationcarriers
AT sunping plasmarankllevelsarenotassociatedwithbreastcancerriskinbrca1andbrca2mutationcarriers
AT narodstevena plasmarankllevelsarenotassociatedwithbreastcancerriskinbrca1andbrca2mutationcarriers
AT salmenaleonardo plasmarankllevelsarenotassociatedwithbreastcancerriskinbrca1andbrca2mutationcarriers
AT kotsopoulosjoanne plasmarankllevelsarenotassociatedwithbreastcancerriskinbrca1andbrca2mutationcarriers