Cargando…
Differences in S/G ratio in natural poplar variants do not predict catalytic depolymerization monomer yields
The ratio of syringyl (S) and guaiacyl (G) units in lignin has been regarded as a major factor in determining the maximum monomer yield from lignin depolymerization. This limit arises from the notion that G units are prone to C-C bond formation during lignin biosynthesis, resulting in less ether lin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6497657/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31048697 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09986-1 |
_version_ | 1783415503251832832 |
---|---|
author | Anderson, Eric M. Stone, Michael L. Katahira, Rui Reed, Michelle Muchero, Wellington Ramirez, Kelsey J. Beckham, Gregg T. Román-Leshkov, Yuriy |
author_facet | Anderson, Eric M. Stone, Michael L. Katahira, Rui Reed, Michelle Muchero, Wellington Ramirez, Kelsey J. Beckham, Gregg T. Román-Leshkov, Yuriy |
author_sort | Anderson, Eric M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The ratio of syringyl (S) and guaiacyl (G) units in lignin has been regarded as a major factor in determining the maximum monomer yield from lignin depolymerization. This limit arises from the notion that G units are prone to C-C bond formation during lignin biosynthesis, resulting in less ether linkages that generate monomers. This study uses reductive catalytic fractionation (RCF) in flow-through reactors as an analytical tool to depolymerize lignin in poplar with naturally varying S/G ratios, and directly challenges the common conception that the S/G ratio predicts monomer yields. Rather, this work suggests that the plant controls C-O and C-C bond content by regulating monomer transport during lignin biosynthesis. Overall, our results indicate that additional factors beyond the monomeric composition of native lignin are important in developing a fundamental understanding of lignin biosynthesis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6497657 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64976572019-05-06 Differences in S/G ratio in natural poplar variants do not predict catalytic depolymerization monomer yields Anderson, Eric M. Stone, Michael L. Katahira, Rui Reed, Michelle Muchero, Wellington Ramirez, Kelsey J. Beckham, Gregg T. Román-Leshkov, Yuriy Nat Commun Article The ratio of syringyl (S) and guaiacyl (G) units in lignin has been regarded as a major factor in determining the maximum monomer yield from lignin depolymerization. This limit arises from the notion that G units are prone to C-C bond formation during lignin biosynthesis, resulting in less ether linkages that generate monomers. This study uses reductive catalytic fractionation (RCF) in flow-through reactors as an analytical tool to depolymerize lignin in poplar with naturally varying S/G ratios, and directly challenges the common conception that the S/G ratio predicts monomer yields. Rather, this work suggests that the plant controls C-O and C-C bond content by regulating monomer transport during lignin biosynthesis. Overall, our results indicate that additional factors beyond the monomeric composition of native lignin are important in developing a fundamental understanding of lignin biosynthesis. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6497657/ /pubmed/31048697 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09986-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Anderson, Eric M. Stone, Michael L. Katahira, Rui Reed, Michelle Muchero, Wellington Ramirez, Kelsey J. Beckham, Gregg T. Román-Leshkov, Yuriy Differences in S/G ratio in natural poplar variants do not predict catalytic depolymerization monomer yields |
title | Differences in S/G ratio in natural poplar variants do not predict catalytic depolymerization monomer yields |
title_full | Differences in S/G ratio in natural poplar variants do not predict catalytic depolymerization monomer yields |
title_fullStr | Differences in S/G ratio in natural poplar variants do not predict catalytic depolymerization monomer yields |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences in S/G ratio in natural poplar variants do not predict catalytic depolymerization monomer yields |
title_short | Differences in S/G ratio in natural poplar variants do not predict catalytic depolymerization monomer yields |
title_sort | differences in s/g ratio in natural poplar variants do not predict catalytic depolymerization monomer yields |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6497657/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31048697 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09986-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT andersonericm differencesinsgratioinnaturalpoplarvariantsdonotpredictcatalyticdepolymerizationmonomeryields AT stonemichaell differencesinsgratioinnaturalpoplarvariantsdonotpredictcatalyticdepolymerizationmonomeryields AT katahirarui differencesinsgratioinnaturalpoplarvariantsdonotpredictcatalyticdepolymerizationmonomeryields AT reedmichelle differencesinsgratioinnaturalpoplarvariantsdonotpredictcatalyticdepolymerizationmonomeryields AT mucherowellington differencesinsgratioinnaturalpoplarvariantsdonotpredictcatalyticdepolymerizationmonomeryields AT ramirezkelseyj differencesinsgratioinnaturalpoplarvariantsdonotpredictcatalyticdepolymerizationmonomeryields AT beckhamgreggt differencesinsgratioinnaturalpoplarvariantsdonotpredictcatalyticdepolymerizationmonomeryields AT romanleshkovyuriy differencesinsgratioinnaturalpoplarvariantsdonotpredictcatalyticdepolymerizationmonomeryields |