Cargando…
Comparison of the trabecular meshwork length between open and closed angle with evaluation of the scleral spur location
This study analysed the trabecular meshwork (TM) length in open and closed angle patients and presented a better method for locating the scleral spur using Schwalbe’s line method in anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT). Patients who underwent AS-OCT at Yonsei University Gangnam Sev...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6497692/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31048724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43315-2 |
_version_ | 1783415510133637120 |
---|---|
author | Choi, Wungrak Lee, Min woo Kang, Hyun Goo Lee, Hye Sun Bae, Hyoung Won Kim, Chan Yun Seong, Gong Je |
author_facet | Choi, Wungrak Lee, Min woo Kang, Hyun Goo Lee, Hye Sun Bae, Hyoung Won Kim, Chan Yun Seong, Gong Je |
author_sort | Choi, Wungrak |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study analysed the trabecular meshwork (TM) length in open and closed angle patients and presented a better method for locating the scleral spur using Schwalbe’s line method in anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT). Patients who underwent AS-OCT at Yonsei University Gangnam Severance Hospital we enrolled; 58 and 57 open and closed angle eyes, respectively. We measured the distance from the scleral spur to Schwalbe’s line as the TM length and compared it between open and closed angle patients, and to previous studies. TM length was applied to locate the scleral spur using Schwalbe’s line method. Mean TM lengths were 811 ± 83 μm and 575 ± 96 μm in the open and closed angle groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Comparing the actual TM heights using Schwalbe’s line method with an updated reference distance significantly increased accuracy to locate the scleral spur (open: 811 μm, closed: 575 μm) when compared with the 1000 μm reference distance (p < 0.001). TM length was significantly different between open and closed angle patients. Further, the reference distance for Schwalbe’s line method should be distinguished according to open and closed angle eyes in order that the scleral spur can be located properly. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6497692 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64976922019-05-17 Comparison of the trabecular meshwork length between open and closed angle with evaluation of the scleral spur location Choi, Wungrak Lee, Min woo Kang, Hyun Goo Lee, Hye Sun Bae, Hyoung Won Kim, Chan Yun Seong, Gong Je Sci Rep Article This study analysed the trabecular meshwork (TM) length in open and closed angle patients and presented a better method for locating the scleral spur using Schwalbe’s line method in anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT). Patients who underwent AS-OCT at Yonsei University Gangnam Severance Hospital we enrolled; 58 and 57 open and closed angle eyes, respectively. We measured the distance from the scleral spur to Schwalbe’s line as the TM length and compared it between open and closed angle patients, and to previous studies. TM length was applied to locate the scleral spur using Schwalbe’s line method. Mean TM lengths were 811 ± 83 μm and 575 ± 96 μm in the open and closed angle groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Comparing the actual TM heights using Schwalbe’s line method with an updated reference distance significantly increased accuracy to locate the scleral spur (open: 811 μm, closed: 575 μm) when compared with the 1000 μm reference distance (p < 0.001). TM length was significantly different between open and closed angle patients. Further, the reference distance for Schwalbe’s line method should be distinguished according to open and closed angle eyes in order that the scleral spur can be located properly. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6497692/ /pubmed/31048724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43315-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Choi, Wungrak Lee, Min woo Kang, Hyun Goo Lee, Hye Sun Bae, Hyoung Won Kim, Chan Yun Seong, Gong Je Comparison of the trabecular meshwork length between open and closed angle with evaluation of the scleral spur location |
title | Comparison of the trabecular meshwork length between open and closed angle with evaluation of the scleral spur location |
title_full | Comparison of the trabecular meshwork length between open and closed angle with evaluation of the scleral spur location |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the trabecular meshwork length between open and closed angle with evaluation of the scleral spur location |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the trabecular meshwork length between open and closed angle with evaluation of the scleral spur location |
title_short | Comparison of the trabecular meshwork length between open and closed angle with evaluation of the scleral spur location |
title_sort | comparison of the trabecular meshwork length between open and closed angle with evaluation of the scleral spur location |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6497692/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31048724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43315-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT choiwungrak comparisonofthetrabecularmeshworklengthbetweenopenandclosedanglewithevaluationofthescleralspurlocation AT leeminwoo comparisonofthetrabecularmeshworklengthbetweenopenandclosedanglewithevaluationofthescleralspurlocation AT kanghyungoo comparisonofthetrabecularmeshworklengthbetweenopenandclosedanglewithevaluationofthescleralspurlocation AT leehyesun comparisonofthetrabecularmeshworklengthbetweenopenandclosedanglewithevaluationofthescleralspurlocation AT baehyoungwon comparisonofthetrabecularmeshworklengthbetweenopenandclosedanglewithevaluationofthescleralspurlocation AT kimchanyun comparisonofthetrabecularmeshworklengthbetweenopenandclosedanglewithevaluationofthescleralspurlocation AT seonggongje comparisonofthetrabecularmeshworklengthbetweenopenandclosedanglewithevaluationofthescleralspurlocation |