Cargando…

Comparison of the trabecular meshwork length between open and closed angle with evaluation of the scleral spur location

This study analysed the trabecular meshwork (TM) length in open and closed angle patients and presented a better method for locating the scleral spur using Schwalbe’s line method in anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT). Patients who underwent AS-OCT at Yonsei University Gangnam Sev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Wungrak, Lee, Min woo, Kang, Hyun Goo, Lee, Hye Sun, Bae, Hyoung Won, Kim, Chan Yun, Seong, Gong Je
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6497692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31048724
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43315-2
_version_ 1783415510133637120
author Choi, Wungrak
Lee, Min woo
Kang, Hyun Goo
Lee, Hye Sun
Bae, Hyoung Won
Kim, Chan Yun
Seong, Gong Je
author_facet Choi, Wungrak
Lee, Min woo
Kang, Hyun Goo
Lee, Hye Sun
Bae, Hyoung Won
Kim, Chan Yun
Seong, Gong Je
author_sort Choi, Wungrak
collection PubMed
description This study analysed the trabecular meshwork (TM) length in open and closed angle patients and presented a better method for locating the scleral spur using Schwalbe’s line method in anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT). Patients who underwent AS-OCT at Yonsei University Gangnam Severance Hospital we enrolled; 58 and 57 open and closed angle eyes, respectively. We measured the distance from the scleral spur to Schwalbe’s line as the TM length and compared it between open and closed angle patients, and to previous studies. TM length was applied to locate the scleral spur using Schwalbe’s line method. Mean TM lengths were 811 ± 83 μm and 575 ± 96 μm in the open and closed angle groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Comparing the actual TM heights using Schwalbe’s line method with an updated reference distance significantly increased accuracy to locate the scleral spur (open: 811 μm, closed: 575 μm) when compared with the 1000 μm reference distance (p < 0.001). TM length was significantly different between open and closed angle patients. Further, the reference distance for Schwalbe’s line method should be distinguished according to open and closed angle eyes in order that the scleral spur can be located properly.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6497692
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64976922019-05-17 Comparison of the trabecular meshwork length between open and closed angle with evaluation of the scleral spur location Choi, Wungrak Lee, Min woo Kang, Hyun Goo Lee, Hye Sun Bae, Hyoung Won Kim, Chan Yun Seong, Gong Je Sci Rep Article This study analysed the trabecular meshwork (TM) length in open and closed angle patients and presented a better method for locating the scleral spur using Schwalbe’s line method in anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT). Patients who underwent AS-OCT at Yonsei University Gangnam Severance Hospital we enrolled; 58 and 57 open and closed angle eyes, respectively. We measured the distance from the scleral spur to Schwalbe’s line as the TM length and compared it between open and closed angle patients, and to previous studies. TM length was applied to locate the scleral spur using Schwalbe’s line method. Mean TM lengths were 811 ± 83 μm and 575 ± 96 μm in the open and closed angle groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Comparing the actual TM heights using Schwalbe’s line method with an updated reference distance significantly increased accuracy to locate the scleral spur (open: 811 μm, closed: 575 μm) when compared with the 1000 μm reference distance (p < 0.001). TM length was significantly different between open and closed angle patients. Further, the reference distance for Schwalbe’s line method should be distinguished according to open and closed angle eyes in order that the scleral spur can be located properly. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6497692/ /pubmed/31048724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43315-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Choi, Wungrak
Lee, Min woo
Kang, Hyun Goo
Lee, Hye Sun
Bae, Hyoung Won
Kim, Chan Yun
Seong, Gong Je
Comparison of the trabecular meshwork length between open and closed angle with evaluation of the scleral spur location
title Comparison of the trabecular meshwork length between open and closed angle with evaluation of the scleral spur location
title_full Comparison of the trabecular meshwork length between open and closed angle with evaluation of the scleral spur location
title_fullStr Comparison of the trabecular meshwork length between open and closed angle with evaluation of the scleral spur location
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the trabecular meshwork length between open and closed angle with evaluation of the scleral spur location
title_short Comparison of the trabecular meshwork length between open and closed angle with evaluation of the scleral spur location
title_sort comparison of the trabecular meshwork length between open and closed angle with evaluation of the scleral spur location
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6497692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31048724
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43315-2
work_keys_str_mv AT choiwungrak comparisonofthetrabecularmeshworklengthbetweenopenandclosedanglewithevaluationofthescleralspurlocation
AT leeminwoo comparisonofthetrabecularmeshworklengthbetweenopenandclosedanglewithevaluationofthescleralspurlocation
AT kanghyungoo comparisonofthetrabecularmeshworklengthbetweenopenandclosedanglewithevaluationofthescleralspurlocation
AT leehyesun comparisonofthetrabecularmeshworklengthbetweenopenandclosedanglewithevaluationofthescleralspurlocation
AT baehyoungwon comparisonofthetrabecularmeshworklengthbetweenopenandclosedanglewithevaluationofthescleralspurlocation
AT kimchanyun comparisonofthetrabecularmeshworklengthbetweenopenandclosedanglewithevaluationofthescleralspurlocation
AT seonggongje comparisonofthetrabecularmeshworklengthbetweenopenandclosedanglewithevaluationofthescleralspurlocation