Cargando…

Intravenous Thrombolysis in Posterior Circulation Stroke

Background: Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is a standard treatment for both anterior circulation ischemic stroke (ACIS) and posterior circulation ischemic stroke (PCIS). PCIS is a clinical syndrome associated with ischemia-related changes in the territory of the posterior circulation arteries. Embol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dorňák, Tomáš, Král, Michal, Šaňák, Daniel, Kaňovský, Petr
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6497784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31080436
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00417
_version_ 1783415531056922624
author Dorňák, Tomáš
Král, Michal
Šaňák, Daniel
Kaňovský, Petr
author_facet Dorňák, Tomáš
Král, Michal
Šaňák, Daniel
Kaňovský, Petr
author_sort Dorňák, Tomáš
collection PubMed
description Background: Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is a standard treatment for both anterior circulation ischemic stroke (ACIS) and posterior circulation ischemic stroke (PCIS). PCIS is a clinical syndrome associated with ischemia-related changes in the territory of the posterior circulation arteries. Embolism is the most common stroke mechanism in posterior circulation. PCIS represents 12–19% of all IVT-treated strokes. Methods and Results: We searched the PubMed database for assessments of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and clinical outcome in PCIS patients treated with IVT. ICH occurs in 0–6.9% of posterior ischemic stroke depending on the definition of symptomatic ICH, and any ICH in 17–23.4% of posterior ischemic stroke. For patients with PCIS, 38–49% have a favorable outcome (mRS 0–1) after IVT. Better clinical outcomes occur more often in patients with PCIS than in those with ACIS. The mortality rate among PCIS patients treated with IVT ranges from 9 to 19%; it does not differ significantly between PCIS and ACIS. Conclusions: Up to date, no data about PCIS and IVT are available from RTCs. Based on limited results from retrospective clinical studies and case series, IVT is safer for use in PCIS than in ACIS. Patients with brainstem ischemia, vertebral artery occlusion, and absence of basilar or posterior cerebral artery occlusion could be considered for treatment with IVT even in borderline cases. Time to IVT in PCIS seems to be a less crucial factor than in ACIS. IVT for PCIS may be beneficial even after 4.5 h from symptom onset.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6497784
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64977842019-05-10 Intravenous Thrombolysis in Posterior Circulation Stroke Dorňák, Tomáš Král, Michal Šaňák, Daniel Kaňovský, Petr Front Neurol Neurology Background: Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is a standard treatment for both anterior circulation ischemic stroke (ACIS) and posterior circulation ischemic stroke (PCIS). PCIS is a clinical syndrome associated with ischemia-related changes in the territory of the posterior circulation arteries. Embolism is the most common stroke mechanism in posterior circulation. PCIS represents 12–19% of all IVT-treated strokes. Methods and Results: We searched the PubMed database for assessments of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and clinical outcome in PCIS patients treated with IVT. ICH occurs in 0–6.9% of posterior ischemic stroke depending on the definition of symptomatic ICH, and any ICH in 17–23.4% of posterior ischemic stroke. For patients with PCIS, 38–49% have a favorable outcome (mRS 0–1) after IVT. Better clinical outcomes occur more often in patients with PCIS than in those with ACIS. The mortality rate among PCIS patients treated with IVT ranges from 9 to 19%; it does not differ significantly between PCIS and ACIS. Conclusions: Up to date, no data about PCIS and IVT are available from RTCs. Based on limited results from retrospective clinical studies and case series, IVT is safer for use in PCIS than in ACIS. Patients with brainstem ischemia, vertebral artery occlusion, and absence of basilar or posterior cerebral artery occlusion could be considered for treatment with IVT even in borderline cases. Time to IVT in PCIS seems to be a less crucial factor than in ACIS. IVT for PCIS may be beneficial even after 4.5 h from symptom onset. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6497784/ /pubmed/31080436 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00417 Text en Copyright © 2019 Dorňák, Král, Šaňák and Kaňovský. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Dorňák, Tomáš
Král, Michal
Šaňák, Daniel
Kaňovský, Petr
Intravenous Thrombolysis in Posterior Circulation Stroke
title Intravenous Thrombolysis in Posterior Circulation Stroke
title_full Intravenous Thrombolysis in Posterior Circulation Stroke
title_fullStr Intravenous Thrombolysis in Posterior Circulation Stroke
title_full_unstemmed Intravenous Thrombolysis in Posterior Circulation Stroke
title_short Intravenous Thrombolysis in Posterior Circulation Stroke
title_sort intravenous thrombolysis in posterior circulation stroke
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6497784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31080436
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00417
work_keys_str_mv AT dornaktomas intravenousthrombolysisinposteriorcirculationstroke
AT kralmichal intravenousthrombolysisinposteriorcirculationstroke
AT sanakdaniel intravenousthrombolysisinposteriorcirculationstroke
AT kanovskypetr intravenousthrombolysisinposteriorcirculationstroke