Cargando…

Low-dose computed tomography of urolithiasis in obese patients: a feasibility study to evaluate image reconstruction algorithms

Purpose: Retrospective evaluation and comparison of image quality generated by low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) from obese patients with urolithiasis using alternative reconstruction algorithms. Materials and methods: Twenty-five obese patients (body mass index [BMI]>25 kg/m(2)) underwent LDCT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chang, De-Hua, Slebocki, Karin, Khristenko, Ekaterina, Herden, Jan, Salem, Johannes, Große Hokamp, Nils, Mammadov, Kamal, Hellmich, Martin, Kabbasch, Christoph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6497819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31114274
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S198641
_version_ 1783415538722013184
author Chang, De-Hua
Slebocki, Karin
Khristenko, Ekaterina
Herden, Jan
Salem, Johannes
Große Hokamp, Nils
Mammadov, Kamal
Hellmich, Martin
Kabbasch, Christoph
author_facet Chang, De-Hua
Slebocki, Karin
Khristenko, Ekaterina
Herden, Jan
Salem, Johannes
Große Hokamp, Nils
Mammadov, Kamal
Hellmich, Martin
Kabbasch, Christoph
author_sort Chang, De-Hua
collection PubMed
description Purpose: Retrospective evaluation and comparison of image quality generated by low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) from obese patients with urolithiasis using alternative reconstruction algorithms. Materials and methods: Twenty-five obese patients (body mass index [BMI]>25 kg/m(2)) underwent LDCT scans for suspected urolithiasis. The scans were recompiled using filtered-back projection (FBP), statistical iterative reconstruction (iDose) and iterative model-based reconstruction (IMR). Dose-length product (DLP) and patient details were obtained from the CT dose report and clinical charts, respectively. Objective image noise was assessed by measuring the SD of Hounsfield units (HUs) in defined locations. Additionally, subjective image evaluation was independently performed by two radiologists using a 3-point Likert scale. The inter-reviewer agreement of image quality was calculated. Results: Ureteral concretions were observed in all CT scans, two of which revealed bilateral stones. The assessed patients’ mean BMI was 29.29±3.74 kg/m(2), and the DLP of the CT scans was 100.04±10.00 mGy*cm. All scans were rated diagnostic with the iDose and iterative model-based reconstructions, whereas 41% of the scans performed with FBP reconstruction were nondiagnostic. With respect to image quality, IMR was superior to iDose and FBP, both in the objective (P<0.001) and overall subjective (P≤0.008) evaluation of the respective data sets. The inter-reviewer agreement for overall image quality was “almost perfect” for IMR, “substantial” for iDose and “moderate” for FBP (κ values of 1.0, 0.6 and 0.46, respectively). Conclusion: Using iterative image reconstruction algorithms, LDCT of urolithiasis is feasible in overweight patients with a BMI between 25 and 35 kg/m(2). Due to higher image quality, IMR is the preferred algorithm for scan reconstruction as it may help to avoid repeated examinations due to initial nondiagnostic scans.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6497819
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64978192019-05-21 Low-dose computed tomography of urolithiasis in obese patients: a feasibility study to evaluate image reconstruction algorithms Chang, De-Hua Slebocki, Karin Khristenko, Ekaterina Herden, Jan Salem, Johannes Große Hokamp, Nils Mammadov, Kamal Hellmich, Martin Kabbasch, Christoph Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes Original Research Purpose: Retrospective evaluation and comparison of image quality generated by low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) from obese patients with urolithiasis using alternative reconstruction algorithms. Materials and methods: Twenty-five obese patients (body mass index [BMI]>25 kg/m(2)) underwent LDCT scans for suspected urolithiasis. The scans were recompiled using filtered-back projection (FBP), statistical iterative reconstruction (iDose) and iterative model-based reconstruction (IMR). Dose-length product (DLP) and patient details were obtained from the CT dose report and clinical charts, respectively. Objective image noise was assessed by measuring the SD of Hounsfield units (HUs) in defined locations. Additionally, subjective image evaluation was independently performed by two radiologists using a 3-point Likert scale. The inter-reviewer agreement of image quality was calculated. Results: Ureteral concretions were observed in all CT scans, two of which revealed bilateral stones. The assessed patients’ mean BMI was 29.29±3.74 kg/m(2), and the DLP of the CT scans was 100.04±10.00 mGy*cm. All scans were rated diagnostic with the iDose and iterative model-based reconstructions, whereas 41% of the scans performed with FBP reconstruction were nondiagnostic. With respect to image quality, IMR was superior to iDose and FBP, both in the objective (P<0.001) and overall subjective (P≤0.008) evaluation of the respective data sets. The inter-reviewer agreement for overall image quality was “almost perfect” for IMR, “substantial” for iDose and “moderate” for FBP (κ values of 1.0, 0.6 and 0.46, respectively). Conclusion: Using iterative image reconstruction algorithms, LDCT of urolithiasis is feasible in overweight patients with a BMI between 25 and 35 kg/m(2). Due to higher image quality, IMR is the preferred algorithm for scan reconstruction as it may help to avoid repeated examinations due to initial nondiagnostic scans. Dove 2019-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6497819/ /pubmed/31114274 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S198641 Text en © 2019 Chang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Chang, De-Hua
Slebocki, Karin
Khristenko, Ekaterina
Herden, Jan
Salem, Johannes
Große Hokamp, Nils
Mammadov, Kamal
Hellmich, Martin
Kabbasch, Christoph
Low-dose computed tomography of urolithiasis in obese patients: a feasibility study to evaluate image reconstruction algorithms
title Low-dose computed tomography of urolithiasis in obese patients: a feasibility study to evaluate image reconstruction algorithms
title_full Low-dose computed tomography of urolithiasis in obese patients: a feasibility study to evaluate image reconstruction algorithms
title_fullStr Low-dose computed tomography of urolithiasis in obese patients: a feasibility study to evaluate image reconstruction algorithms
title_full_unstemmed Low-dose computed tomography of urolithiasis in obese patients: a feasibility study to evaluate image reconstruction algorithms
title_short Low-dose computed tomography of urolithiasis in obese patients: a feasibility study to evaluate image reconstruction algorithms
title_sort low-dose computed tomography of urolithiasis in obese patients: a feasibility study to evaluate image reconstruction algorithms
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6497819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31114274
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S198641
work_keys_str_mv AT changdehua lowdosecomputedtomographyofurolithiasisinobesepatientsafeasibilitystudytoevaluateimagereconstructionalgorithms
AT slebockikarin lowdosecomputedtomographyofurolithiasisinobesepatientsafeasibilitystudytoevaluateimagereconstructionalgorithms
AT khristenkoekaterina lowdosecomputedtomographyofurolithiasisinobesepatientsafeasibilitystudytoevaluateimagereconstructionalgorithms
AT herdenjan lowdosecomputedtomographyofurolithiasisinobesepatientsafeasibilitystudytoevaluateimagereconstructionalgorithms
AT salemjohannes lowdosecomputedtomographyofurolithiasisinobesepatientsafeasibilitystudytoevaluateimagereconstructionalgorithms
AT großehokampnils lowdosecomputedtomographyofurolithiasisinobesepatientsafeasibilitystudytoevaluateimagereconstructionalgorithms
AT mammadovkamal lowdosecomputedtomographyofurolithiasisinobesepatientsafeasibilitystudytoevaluateimagereconstructionalgorithms
AT hellmichmartin lowdosecomputedtomographyofurolithiasisinobesepatientsafeasibilitystudytoevaluateimagereconstructionalgorithms
AT kabbaschchristoph lowdosecomputedtomographyofurolithiasisinobesepatientsafeasibilitystudytoevaluateimagereconstructionalgorithms