Cargando…

Centering female agency while investigating contraceptive use: a case study in Agincourt, South Africa

BACKGROUND: Rural areas of South Africa face persistently high teenage and premarital childbearing rates, reflecting a lack of or inconsistent use of modern contraception. In attempting to understand this behavior, much of the literature has denied agency to young women, portraying them solely as vi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Margherio, Cara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6498472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31046765
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-019-0965-7
_version_ 1783415615642402816
author Margherio, Cara
author_facet Margherio, Cara
author_sort Margherio, Cara
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Rural areas of South Africa face persistently high teenage and premarital childbearing rates, reflecting a lack of or inconsistent use of modern contraception. In attempting to understand this behavior, much of the literature has denied agency to young women, portraying them solely as victims of their environments. This study moved beyond these approaches to understanding adolescent contraceptive use, to reframe the investigation to focus on the tension around exercising agency within specific structural constraints. METHODS: Findings are based on a qualitative study in Agincourt, South Africa. Data were collected through six focus group discussions with 63 women aged 18–44. A grounded theory approach utilizing emergent coding was performed focusing on the decision-making processes around family planning. The focus group participants discussed attitudes and norms around: early first births, contraceptive use, unplanned pregnancy, abortion, and HIV testing. When possible, differences that emerged around these topics according to the age groups (18–24, 25–34, and 35–44) and/or nationality of village (South African or Mozambican) are highlighted. RESULTS: Participants of all focus groups agreed that early first birth were common and undesirable. Younger participants described pregnancy prevention as a key rationale for contraceptive usage, while older participants were more inclined to cite HIV prevention. Women of all focus groups discussed the importance of women taking the initiative with family planning. Participants expressed a range of opinions about the acceptability of abortion, and all focus groups discussed concerns about the safety of abortion. Finally, all of the focus group participants stressed the importance of HIV testing, both to protect themselves and to protect their families. CONCLUSION: This study found many locations of agency for young women in rural South Africa. The decision-making surrounding contraceptive use consists of a series of decision junctures at which women must assign values to certain factors and then select their behavior on the basis of those values. Young women weigh the costs and benefits of contraception and of pregnancy, while also taking into account the chances of actually becoming pregnant along with the costs and benefits of abortion. Furthermore, the women explicitly viewed contraception as within their own realm of decision-making and action (as opposed to within the realm of their male partners).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6498472
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64984722019-05-09 Centering female agency while investigating contraceptive use: a case study in Agincourt, South Africa Margherio, Cara Int J Equity Health Research BACKGROUND: Rural areas of South Africa face persistently high teenage and premarital childbearing rates, reflecting a lack of or inconsistent use of modern contraception. In attempting to understand this behavior, much of the literature has denied agency to young women, portraying them solely as victims of their environments. This study moved beyond these approaches to understanding adolescent contraceptive use, to reframe the investigation to focus on the tension around exercising agency within specific structural constraints. METHODS: Findings are based on a qualitative study in Agincourt, South Africa. Data were collected through six focus group discussions with 63 women aged 18–44. A grounded theory approach utilizing emergent coding was performed focusing on the decision-making processes around family planning. The focus group participants discussed attitudes and norms around: early first births, contraceptive use, unplanned pregnancy, abortion, and HIV testing. When possible, differences that emerged around these topics according to the age groups (18–24, 25–34, and 35–44) and/or nationality of village (South African or Mozambican) are highlighted. RESULTS: Participants of all focus groups agreed that early first birth were common and undesirable. Younger participants described pregnancy prevention as a key rationale for contraceptive usage, while older participants were more inclined to cite HIV prevention. Women of all focus groups discussed the importance of women taking the initiative with family planning. Participants expressed a range of opinions about the acceptability of abortion, and all focus groups discussed concerns about the safety of abortion. Finally, all of the focus group participants stressed the importance of HIV testing, both to protect themselves and to protect their families. CONCLUSION: This study found many locations of agency for young women in rural South Africa. The decision-making surrounding contraceptive use consists of a series of decision junctures at which women must assign values to certain factors and then select their behavior on the basis of those values. Young women weigh the costs and benefits of contraception and of pregnancy, while also taking into account the chances of actually becoming pregnant along with the costs and benefits of abortion. Furthermore, the women explicitly viewed contraception as within their own realm of decision-making and action (as opposed to within the realm of their male partners). BioMed Central 2019-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6498472/ /pubmed/31046765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-019-0965-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Margherio, Cara
Centering female agency while investigating contraceptive use: a case study in Agincourt, South Africa
title Centering female agency while investigating contraceptive use: a case study in Agincourt, South Africa
title_full Centering female agency while investigating contraceptive use: a case study in Agincourt, South Africa
title_fullStr Centering female agency while investigating contraceptive use: a case study in Agincourt, South Africa
title_full_unstemmed Centering female agency while investigating contraceptive use: a case study in Agincourt, South Africa
title_short Centering female agency while investigating contraceptive use: a case study in Agincourt, South Africa
title_sort centering female agency while investigating contraceptive use: a case study in agincourt, south africa
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6498472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31046765
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-019-0965-7
work_keys_str_mv AT margheriocara centeringfemaleagencywhileinvestigatingcontraceptiveuseacasestudyinagincourtsouthafrica