Cargando…
Educators’ behaviours during feedback in authentic clinical practice settings: an observational study and systematic analysis
BACKGROUND: Verbal feedback plays a critical role in health professions education but it is not clear which components of effective feedback have been successfully translated from the literature into supervisory practice in the workplace, and which have not. The purpose of this study was to observe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6498493/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31046776 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1524-z |
_version_ | 1783415620619993088 |
---|---|
author | Johnson, Christina E. Keating, Jennifer L. Farlie, Melanie K. Kent, Fiona Leech, Michelle Molloy, Elizabeth K. |
author_facet | Johnson, Christina E. Keating, Jennifer L. Farlie, Melanie K. Kent, Fiona Leech, Michelle Molloy, Elizabeth K. |
author_sort | Johnson, Christina E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Verbal feedback plays a critical role in health professions education but it is not clear which components of effective feedback have been successfully translated from the literature into supervisory practice in the workplace, and which have not. The purpose of this study was to observe and systematically analyse educators’ behaviours during authentic feedback episodes in contemporary clinical practice. METHODS: Educators and learners videoed themselves during formal feedback sessions in routine hospital training. Researchers compared educators’ practice to a published set of 25 educator behaviours recommended for quality feedback. Individual educator behaviours were rated 0 = not seen, 1 = done somewhat, 2 = consistently done. To characterise individual educator’s practice, their behaviour scores were summed. To describe how commonly each behaviour was observed across all the videos, mean scores were calculated. RESULTS: Researchers analysed 36 videos involving 34 educators (26 medical, 4 nursing, 4 physiotherapy professionals) and 35 learners across different health professions, specialties, levels of experience and gender. There was considerable variation in both educators’ feedback practices, indicated by total scores for individual educators ranging from 5.7 to 34.2 (maximum possible 48), and how frequently specific feedback behaviours were seen across all the videos, indicated by mean scores for each behaviour ranging from 0.1 to 1.75 (maximum possible 2). Educators commonly provided performance analysis, described how the task should be performed, and were respectful and supportive. However a number of recommended feedback behaviours were rarely seen, such as clarifying the session purpose and expectations, promoting learner involvement, creating an action plan or arranging a subsequent review. CONCLUSIONS: These findings clarify contemporary feedback practice and inform the design of educational initiatives to help health professional educators and learners to better realise the potential of feedback. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6498493 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64984932019-05-09 Educators’ behaviours during feedback in authentic clinical practice settings: an observational study and systematic analysis Johnson, Christina E. Keating, Jennifer L. Farlie, Melanie K. Kent, Fiona Leech, Michelle Molloy, Elizabeth K. BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Verbal feedback plays a critical role in health professions education but it is not clear which components of effective feedback have been successfully translated from the literature into supervisory practice in the workplace, and which have not. The purpose of this study was to observe and systematically analyse educators’ behaviours during authentic feedback episodes in contemporary clinical practice. METHODS: Educators and learners videoed themselves during formal feedback sessions in routine hospital training. Researchers compared educators’ practice to a published set of 25 educator behaviours recommended for quality feedback. Individual educator behaviours were rated 0 = not seen, 1 = done somewhat, 2 = consistently done. To characterise individual educator’s practice, their behaviour scores were summed. To describe how commonly each behaviour was observed across all the videos, mean scores were calculated. RESULTS: Researchers analysed 36 videos involving 34 educators (26 medical, 4 nursing, 4 physiotherapy professionals) and 35 learners across different health professions, specialties, levels of experience and gender. There was considerable variation in both educators’ feedback practices, indicated by total scores for individual educators ranging from 5.7 to 34.2 (maximum possible 48), and how frequently specific feedback behaviours were seen across all the videos, indicated by mean scores for each behaviour ranging from 0.1 to 1.75 (maximum possible 2). Educators commonly provided performance analysis, described how the task should be performed, and were respectful and supportive. However a number of recommended feedback behaviours were rarely seen, such as clarifying the session purpose and expectations, promoting learner involvement, creating an action plan or arranging a subsequent review. CONCLUSIONS: These findings clarify contemporary feedback practice and inform the design of educational initiatives to help health professional educators and learners to better realise the potential of feedback. BioMed Central 2019-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6498493/ /pubmed/31046776 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1524-z Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Johnson, Christina E. Keating, Jennifer L. Farlie, Melanie K. Kent, Fiona Leech, Michelle Molloy, Elizabeth K. Educators’ behaviours during feedback in authentic clinical practice settings: an observational study and systematic analysis |
title | Educators’ behaviours during feedback in authentic clinical practice settings: an observational study and systematic analysis |
title_full | Educators’ behaviours during feedback in authentic clinical practice settings: an observational study and systematic analysis |
title_fullStr | Educators’ behaviours during feedback in authentic clinical practice settings: an observational study and systematic analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Educators’ behaviours during feedback in authentic clinical practice settings: an observational study and systematic analysis |
title_short | Educators’ behaviours during feedback in authentic clinical practice settings: an observational study and systematic analysis |
title_sort | educators’ behaviours during feedback in authentic clinical practice settings: an observational study and systematic analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6498493/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31046776 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1524-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT johnsonchristinae educatorsbehavioursduringfeedbackinauthenticclinicalpracticesettingsanobservationalstudyandsystematicanalysis AT keatingjenniferl educatorsbehavioursduringfeedbackinauthenticclinicalpracticesettingsanobservationalstudyandsystematicanalysis AT farliemelaniek educatorsbehavioursduringfeedbackinauthenticclinicalpracticesettingsanobservationalstudyandsystematicanalysis AT kentfiona educatorsbehavioursduringfeedbackinauthenticclinicalpracticesettingsanobservationalstudyandsystematicanalysis AT leechmichelle educatorsbehavioursduringfeedbackinauthenticclinicalpracticesettingsanobservationalstudyandsystematicanalysis AT molloyelizabethk educatorsbehavioursduringfeedbackinauthenticclinicalpracticesettingsanobservationalstudyandsystematicanalysis |