Cargando…

A new approach to OSCE preparation - PrOSCEs

BACKGROUND: Objectively structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) are a stressful experience for many health care students and professionals in training. Mock OSCEs have been shown to be beneficial for student OSCE preparation. However, due to their expense and administrative burden students may only...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bevan, James, Russell, Benjamin, Marshall, Ben
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6498564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31046773
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1571-5
_version_ 1783415637030207488
author Bevan, James
Russell, Benjamin
Marshall, Ben
author_facet Bevan, James
Russell, Benjamin
Marshall, Ben
author_sort Bevan, James
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Objectively structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) are a stressful experience for many health care students and professionals in training. Mock OSCEs have been shown to be beneficial for student OSCE preparation. However, due to their expense and administrative burden students may only get a few opportunities to partake in these. To address this gap in student preparation a series of regularly run totally peer led multi-role practice OSCEs (PrOSCEs) was developed. METHODS: Fifteen PrOSCEs were run over five-months. A total of 32 second year medical students took part, all of whom were enrolled on the graduate-entry programme at the University of Southampton. In each PrOSCE, 18 participants rotated through the roles of ‘student’, ‘examiner’ and ‘patient’ in six simulated stations designed by their peers. Peer feedback was provided after each station. At the end of the series of PrOSCEs students were asked to fill in an anonymous online feedback survey to assess the usefulness of the PrOSCEs in exam preparation. RESULTS: Twenty-two students responded to the survey. 100% of respondents deemed routine participation either ‘very useful’ or ‘useful’ in preparing for their exam. PrOSCEs were found to improve confidence (mean = 7.9/10, 95% CI 7.4–8.3), expected performance (mean = 7.5/10, 95% CI 6.8–8.2) and help guide revision (mean = 8.3/10, 95% CI 7.6–9.0). Self-perceived teaching performance and confidence in providing feedback was also positively associated with participation. The most beneficial roles were ‘student’ and ‘station creator’. Free-text feedback suggests that the informal setting and regular practice were particularly beneficial. CONCLUSION: The peer-led nature of the PrOSCEs allows for a low cost, low administrative burden and easy to replicate adjunct or alternative to large scale mock OSCEs. In addition the multi-role aspect of this approach could enhance exam preparation and may also improve aptitude as a clinical teacher. Further studies are required to understand if repeated practice has beneficial implications on OSCE performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6498564
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64985642019-05-09 A new approach to OSCE preparation - PrOSCEs Bevan, James Russell, Benjamin Marshall, Ben BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Objectively structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) are a stressful experience for many health care students and professionals in training. Mock OSCEs have been shown to be beneficial for student OSCE preparation. However, due to their expense and administrative burden students may only get a few opportunities to partake in these. To address this gap in student preparation a series of regularly run totally peer led multi-role practice OSCEs (PrOSCEs) was developed. METHODS: Fifteen PrOSCEs were run over five-months. A total of 32 second year medical students took part, all of whom were enrolled on the graduate-entry programme at the University of Southampton. In each PrOSCE, 18 participants rotated through the roles of ‘student’, ‘examiner’ and ‘patient’ in six simulated stations designed by their peers. Peer feedback was provided after each station. At the end of the series of PrOSCEs students were asked to fill in an anonymous online feedback survey to assess the usefulness of the PrOSCEs in exam preparation. RESULTS: Twenty-two students responded to the survey. 100% of respondents deemed routine participation either ‘very useful’ or ‘useful’ in preparing for their exam. PrOSCEs were found to improve confidence (mean = 7.9/10, 95% CI 7.4–8.3), expected performance (mean = 7.5/10, 95% CI 6.8–8.2) and help guide revision (mean = 8.3/10, 95% CI 7.6–9.0). Self-perceived teaching performance and confidence in providing feedback was also positively associated with participation. The most beneficial roles were ‘student’ and ‘station creator’. Free-text feedback suggests that the informal setting and regular practice were particularly beneficial. CONCLUSION: The peer-led nature of the PrOSCEs allows for a low cost, low administrative burden and easy to replicate adjunct or alternative to large scale mock OSCEs. In addition the multi-role aspect of this approach could enhance exam preparation and may also improve aptitude as a clinical teacher. Further studies are required to understand if repeated practice has beneficial implications on OSCE performance. BioMed Central 2019-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6498564/ /pubmed/31046773 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1571-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bevan, James
Russell, Benjamin
Marshall, Ben
A new approach to OSCE preparation - PrOSCEs
title A new approach to OSCE preparation - PrOSCEs
title_full A new approach to OSCE preparation - PrOSCEs
title_fullStr A new approach to OSCE preparation - PrOSCEs
title_full_unstemmed A new approach to OSCE preparation - PrOSCEs
title_short A new approach to OSCE preparation - PrOSCEs
title_sort new approach to osce preparation - prosces
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6498564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31046773
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1571-5
work_keys_str_mv AT bevanjames anewapproachtooscepreparationprosces
AT russellbenjamin anewapproachtooscepreparationprosces
AT marshallben anewapproachtooscepreparationprosces
AT bevanjames newapproachtooscepreparationprosces
AT russellbenjamin newapproachtooscepreparationprosces
AT marshallben newapproachtooscepreparationprosces