Cargando…

Quality indicators in type 2 diabetes patient care: analysis per care-complexity level

BACKGROUND: This study was developed to evaluate quality indicators in type 2 diabetes patient care at the Unified Public Health System’s primary and tertiary health care centers within a local population. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort of 488 patients with type 2 diabetes (148 in each pri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schneiders, Josiane, Telo, Gabriela H., Bottino, Leonardo Grabinski, Pasinato, Bruna, Neyeloff, Jeruza Lavanholi, Schaan, Beatriz D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6498653/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31073334
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13098-019-0428-8
_version_ 1783415657733292032
author Schneiders, Josiane
Telo, Gabriela H.
Bottino, Leonardo Grabinski
Pasinato, Bruna
Neyeloff, Jeruza Lavanholi
Schaan, Beatriz D.
author_facet Schneiders, Josiane
Telo, Gabriela H.
Bottino, Leonardo Grabinski
Pasinato, Bruna
Neyeloff, Jeruza Lavanholi
Schaan, Beatriz D.
author_sort Schneiders, Josiane
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study was developed to evaluate quality indicators in type 2 diabetes patient care at the Unified Public Health System’s primary and tertiary health care centers within a local population. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort of 488 patients with type 2 diabetes (148 in each primary health care unit, ESF and UBS, and 192 at the tertiary health care unit) with a 1-year follow-up to evaluate the following care quality indicators: nephropathy, neuropathy and retinopathy tests, yearly lipid profile and nutritional assessments, and an inquiry about tobacco use. The presence of > 50% of the quality of care assessment measures was considered acceptable. Indicators were also evaluated in relation to patients without proper diabetes control (HbA1c > 8.5%). RESULTS: In the results, a high percentage of patients were excluded specifically for not presenting the two HbA1c tests within a year (n = 208, 58.1% at ESF; n = 225, 58.4% at UBS; and n = 39, 16.9% at the tertiary health care unit). From the included patients, only 7 (4.7%) at ESF, 7 (4.7%) at UBS, and 52 (27.0%) at the tertiary health care unit showed > 50% of the quality criteria covered. When only patients without proper diabetes control were evaluated, none of them at any of the health care units showed all the quality criteria covered. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show a low percentage of care assessment measures at each evaluated health care unit, pointing out the need to improve the protocols and care lines of diabetic patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6498653
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64986532019-05-09 Quality indicators in type 2 diabetes patient care: analysis per care-complexity level Schneiders, Josiane Telo, Gabriela H. Bottino, Leonardo Grabinski Pasinato, Bruna Neyeloff, Jeruza Lavanholi Schaan, Beatriz D. Diabetol Metab Syndr Research BACKGROUND: This study was developed to evaluate quality indicators in type 2 diabetes patient care at the Unified Public Health System’s primary and tertiary health care centers within a local population. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort of 488 patients with type 2 diabetes (148 in each primary health care unit, ESF and UBS, and 192 at the tertiary health care unit) with a 1-year follow-up to evaluate the following care quality indicators: nephropathy, neuropathy and retinopathy tests, yearly lipid profile and nutritional assessments, and an inquiry about tobacco use. The presence of > 50% of the quality of care assessment measures was considered acceptable. Indicators were also evaluated in relation to patients without proper diabetes control (HbA1c > 8.5%). RESULTS: In the results, a high percentage of patients were excluded specifically for not presenting the two HbA1c tests within a year (n = 208, 58.1% at ESF; n = 225, 58.4% at UBS; and n = 39, 16.9% at the tertiary health care unit). From the included patients, only 7 (4.7%) at ESF, 7 (4.7%) at UBS, and 52 (27.0%) at the tertiary health care unit showed > 50% of the quality criteria covered. When only patients without proper diabetes control were evaluated, none of them at any of the health care units showed all the quality criteria covered. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show a low percentage of care assessment measures at each evaluated health care unit, pointing out the need to improve the protocols and care lines of diabetic patients. BioMed Central 2019-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6498653/ /pubmed/31073334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13098-019-0428-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Schneiders, Josiane
Telo, Gabriela H.
Bottino, Leonardo Grabinski
Pasinato, Bruna
Neyeloff, Jeruza Lavanholi
Schaan, Beatriz D.
Quality indicators in type 2 diabetes patient care: analysis per care-complexity level
title Quality indicators in type 2 diabetes patient care: analysis per care-complexity level
title_full Quality indicators in type 2 diabetes patient care: analysis per care-complexity level
title_fullStr Quality indicators in type 2 diabetes patient care: analysis per care-complexity level
title_full_unstemmed Quality indicators in type 2 diabetes patient care: analysis per care-complexity level
title_short Quality indicators in type 2 diabetes patient care: analysis per care-complexity level
title_sort quality indicators in type 2 diabetes patient care: analysis per care-complexity level
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6498653/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31073334
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13098-019-0428-8
work_keys_str_mv AT schneidersjosiane qualityindicatorsintype2diabetespatientcareanalysispercarecomplexitylevel
AT telogabrielah qualityindicatorsintype2diabetespatientcareanalysispercarecomplexitylevel
AT bottinoleonardograbinski qualityindicatorsintype2diabetespatientcareanalysispercarecomplexitylevel
AT pasinatobruna qualityindicatorsintype2diabetespatientcareanalysispercarecomplexitylevel
AT neyeloffjeruzalavanholi qualityindicatorsintype2diabetespatientcareanalysispercarecomplexitylevel
AT schaanbeatrizd qualityindicatorsintype2diabetespatientcareanalysispercarecomplexitylevel