Cargando…
Quality indicators in type 2 diabetes patient care: analysis per care-complexity level
BACKGROUND: This study was developed to evaluate quality indicators in type 2 diabetes patient care at the Unified Public Health System’s primary and tertiary health care centers within a local population. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort of 488 patients with type 2 diabetes (148 in each pri...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6498653/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31073334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13098-019-0428-8 |
_version_ | 1783415657733292032 |
---|---|
author | Schneiders, Josiane Telo, Gabriela H. Bottino, Leonardo Grabinski Pasinato, Bruna Neyeloff, Jeruza Lavanholi Schaan, Beatriz D. |
author_facet | Schneiders, Josiane Telo, Gabriela H. Bottino, Leonardo Grabinski Pasinato, Bruna Neyeloff, Jeruza Lavanholi Schaan, Beatriz D. |
author_sort | Schneiders, Josiane |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study was developed to evaluate quality indicators in type 2 diabetes patient care at the Unified Public Health System’s primary and tertiary health care centers within a local population. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort of 488 patients with type 2 diabetes (148 in each primary health care unit, ESF and UBS, and 192 at the tertiary health care unit) with a 1-year follow-up to evaluate the following care quality indicators: nephropathy, neuropathy and retinopathy tests, yearly lipid profile and nutritional assessments, and an inquiry about tobacco use. The presence of > 50% of the quality of care assessment measures was considered acceptable. Indicators were also evaluated in relation to patients without proper diabetes control (HbA1c > 8.5%). RESULTS: In the results, a high percentage of patients were excluded specifically for not presenting the two HbA1c tests within a year (n = 208, 58.1% at ESF; n = 225, 58.4% at UBS; and n = 39, 16.9% at the tertiary health care unit). From the included patients, only 7 (4.7%) at ESF, 7 (4.7%) at UBS, and 52 (27.0%) at the tertiary health care unit showed > 50% of the quality criteria covered. When only patients without proper diabetes control were evaluated, none of them at any of the health care units showed all the quality criteria covered. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show a low percentage of care assessment measures at each evaluated health care unit, pointing out the need to improve the protocols and care lines of diabetic patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6498653 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64986532019-05-09 Quality indicators in type 2 diabetes patient care: analysis per care-complexity level Schneiders, Josiane Telo, Gabriela H. Bottino, Leonardo Grabinski Pasinato, Bruna Neyeloff, Jeruza Lavanholi Schaan, Beatriz D. Diabetol Metab Syndr Research BACKGROUND: This study was developed to evaluate quality indicators in type 2 diabetes patient care at the Unified Public Health System’s primary and tertiary health care centers within a local population. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort of 488 patients with type 2 diabetes (148 in each primary health care unit, ESF and UBS, and 192 at the tertiary health care unit) with a 1-year follow-up to evaluate the following care quality indicators: nephropathy, neuropathy and retinopathy tests, yearly lipid profile and nutritional assessments, and an inquiry about tobacco use. The presence of > 50% of the quality of care assessment measures was considered acceptable. Indicators were also evaluated in relation to patients without proper diabetes control (HbA1c > 8.5%). RESULTS: In the results, a high percentage of patients were excluded specifically for not presenting the two HbA1c tests within a year (n = 208, 58.1% at ESF; n = 225, 58.4% at UBS; and n = 39, 16.9% at the tertiary health care unit). From the included patients, only 7 (4.7%) at ESF, 7 (4.7%) at UBS, and 52 (27.0%) at the tertiary health care unit showed > 50% of the quality criteria covered. When only patients without proper diabetes control were evaluated, none of them at any of the health care units showed all the quality criteria covered. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show a low percentage of care assessment measures at each evaluated health care unit, pointing out the need to improve the protocols and care lines of diabetic patients. BioMed Central 2019-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6498653/ /pubmed/31073334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13098-019-0428-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Schneiders, Josiane Telo, Gabriela H. Bottino, Leonardo Grabinski Pasinato, Bruna Neyeloff, Jeruza Lavanholi Schaan, Beatriz D. Quality indicators in type 2 diabetes patient care: analysis per care-complexity level |
title | Quality indicators in type 2 diabetes patient care: analysis per care-complexity level |
title_full | Quality indicators in type 2 diabetes patient care: analysis per care-complexity level |
title_fullStr | Quality indicators in type 2 diabetes patient care: analysis per care-complexity level |
title_full_unstemmed | Quality indicators in type 2 diabetes patient care: analysis per care-complexity level |
title_short | Quality indicators in type 2 diabetes patient care: analysis per care-complexity level |
title_sort | quality indicators in type 2 diabetes patient care: analysis per care-complexity level |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6498653/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31073334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13098-019-0428-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schneidersjosiane qualityindicatorsintype2diabetespatientcareanalysispercarecomplexitylevel AT telogabrielah qualityindicatorsintype2diabetespatientcareanalysispercarecomplexitylevel AT bottinoleonardograbinski qualityindicatorsintype2diabetespatientcareanalysispercarecomplexitylevel AT pasinatobruna qualityindicatorsintype2diabetespatientcareanalysispercarecomplexitylevel AT neyeloffjeruzalavanholi qualityindicatorsintype2diabetespatientcareanalysispercarecomplexitylevel AT schaanbeatrizd qualityindicatorsintype2diabetespatientcareanalysispercarecomplexitylevel |