Cargando…

Effectiveness of monthly and bimonthly follow-up of patients with well-controlled type 2 diabetes: a propensity score matched cohort study

BACKGROUND: On average, patients in Japan with type 2 diabetes mellitus have a clinical consultation every month, although evidence for a favorable follow-up interval is lacking. This study investigated whether the follow-up interval can be extended by comparing the clinical outcomes and cost for mo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ukai, Tomohiko, Ichikawa, Shuhei, Sekimoto, Miho, Shikata, Satoru, Takemura, Yousuke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6498692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31046742
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12902-019-0372-5
_version_ 1783415666798231552
author Ukai, Tomohiko
Ichikawa, Shuhei
Sekimoto, Miho
Shikata, Satoru
Takemura, Yousuke
author_facet Ukai, Tomohiko
Ichikawa, Shuhei
Sekimoto, Miho
Shikata, Satoru
Takemura, Yousuke
author_sort Ukai, Tomohiko
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: On average, patients in Japan with type 2 diabetes mellitus have a clinical consultation every month, although evidence for a favorable follow-up interval is lacking. This study investigated whether the follow-up interval can be extended by comparing the clinical outcomes and cost for monthly versus bimonthly follow-up of patients with well-controlled diabetes mellitus. METHODS: We combined administrative claims data from the National Health Insurance and the Health Checkups Program data of Tsu city, Japan between 2011 and 2014 to conduct a retrospective cohort study of patients with well-controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus. Propensity scores were used to assemble a matched-pairs cohort from patients who had monthly and bimonthly follow-up. Equivalence between two groups was assessed by designating the proportion of patients who maintained good control of their diabetes in the subsequent year as a primary outcome. The proportion achieving target blood pressure and lipid levels, favorable lifestyle, and annual cost were compared as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Of 12,145 participants, 693 with monthly follow-up and 693 with bimonthly follow-up were matched using propensity scores. In the monthly follow-up group 654 (94.4%) remained under good diabetic control, versus 658 (95.0%) in the bimonthly group (difference: 0.6%; 95% confidence interval: − 1.8 to 2.9%). All secondary outcomes were equivalent for the monthly and bimonthly follow-up groups except the proportion achieving target blood pressure, the proportion engaging in regular exercise, and annual cost. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with well-controlled diabetes mellitus, although frequent follow-up by a physician does not affect the control of blood glucose level in the subsequent year, the annual treatment cost becomes much higher. We suggest that patients with well-controlled diabetes can be followed up less often.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6498692
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64986922019-05-09 Effectiveness of monthly and bimonthly follow-up of patients with well-controlled type 2 diabetes: a propensity score matched cohort study Ukai, Tomohiko Ichikawa, Shuhei Sekimoto, Miho Shikata, Satoru Takemura, Yousuke BMC Endocr Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: On average, patients in Japan with type 2 diabetes mellitus have a clinical consultation every month, although evidence for a favorable follow-up interval is lacking. This study investigated whether the follow-up interval can be extended by comparing the clinical outcomes and cost for monthly versus bimonthly follow-up of patients with well-controlled diabetes mellitus. METHODS: We combined administrative claims data from the National Health Insurance and the Health Checkups Program data of Tsu city, Japan between 2011 and 2014 to conduct a retrospective cohort study of patients with well-controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus. Propensity scores were used to assemble a matched-pairs cohort from patients who had monthly and bimonthly follow-up. Equivalence between two groups was assessed by designating the proportion of patients who maintained good control of their diabetes in the subsequent year as a primary outcome. The proportion achieving target blood pressure and lipid levels, favorable lifestyle, and annual cost were compared as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Of 12,145 participants, 693 with monthly follow-up and 693 with bimonthly follow-up were matched using propensity scores. In the monthly follow-up group 654 (94.4%) remained under good diabetic control, versus 658 (95.0%) in the bimonthly group (difference: 0.6%; 95% confidence interval: − 1.8 to 2.9%). All secondary outcomes were equivalent for the monthly and bimonthly follow-up groups except the proportion achieving target blood pressure, the proportion engaging in regular exercise, and annual cost. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with well-controlled diabetes mellitus, although frequent follow-up by a physician does not affect the control of blood glucose level in the subsequent year, the annual treatment cost becomes much higher. We suggest that patients with well-controlled diabetes can be followed up less often. BioMed Central 2019-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6498692/ /pubmed/31046742 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12902-019-0372-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ukai, Tomohiko
Ichikawa, Shuhei
Sekimoto, Miho
Shikata, Satoru
Takemura, Yousuke
Effectiveness of monthly and bimonthly follow-up of patients with well-controlled type 2 diabetes: a propensity score matched cohort study
title Effectiveness of monthly and bimonthly follow-up of patients with well-controlled type 2 diabetes: a propensity score matched cohort study
title_full Effectiveness of monthly and bimonthly follow-up of patients with well-controlled type 2 diabetes: a propensity score matched cohort study
title_fullStr Effectiveness of monthly and bimonthly follow-up of patients with well-controlled type 2 diabetes: a propensity score matched cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of monthly and bimonthly follow-up of patients with well-controlled type 2 diabetes: a propensity score matched cohort study
title_short Effectiveness of monthly and bimonthly follow-up of patients with well-controlled type 2 diabetes: a propensity score matched cohort study
title_sort effectiveness of monthly and bimonthly follow-up of patients with well-controlled type 2 diabetes: a propensity score matched cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6498692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31046742
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12902-019-0372-5
work_keys_str_mv AT ukaitomohiko effectivenessofmonthlyandbimonthlyfollowupofpatientswithwellcontrolledtype2diabetesapropensityscorematchedcohortstudy
AT ichikawashuhei effectivenessofmonthlyandbimonthlyfollowupofpatientswithwellcontrolledtype2diabetesapropensityscorematchedcohortstudy
AT sekimotomiho effectivenessofmonthlyandbimonthlyfollowupofpatientswithwellcontrolledtype2diabetesapropensityscorematchedcohortstudy
AT shikatasatoru effectivenessofmonthlyandbimonthlyfollowupofpatientswithwellcontrolledtype2diabetesapropensityscorematchedcohortstudy
AT takemurayousuke effectivenessofmonthlyandbimonthlyfollowupofpatientswithwellcontrolledtype2diabetesapropensityscorematchedcohortstudy