Cargando…

Evaluation of postoperative analgesia in pediatric patients after hip surgery: lumbar plexus versus caudal epidural analgesia

Background:There continues to be focus on the value of regional and neuraxial anesthetic techniques when combined with general anesthesia to improve postoperative analgesia. The reported advantages include decreased postoperative opioid requirements, decreased medication-related adverse effects, dec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Villalobos, Mauricio Arce, Veneziano, Giorgio, Miller, Rebecca, Beltran, Ralph J, Krishna, Senthil, Tumin, Dmitry, Klingele, Kevin, Tobias, Joseph D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6498965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31118744
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S191945
_version_ 1783415718948110336
author Villalobos, Mauricio Arce
Veneziano, Giorgio
Miller, Rebecca
Beltran, Ralph J
Krishna, Senthil
Tumin, Dmitry
Klingele, Kevin
Tobias, Joseph D
author_facet Villalobos, Mauricio Arce
Veneziano, Giorgio
Miller, Rebecca
Beltran, Ralph J
Krishna, Senthil
Tumin, Dmitry
Klingele, Kevin
Tobias, Joseph D
author_sort Villalobos, Mauricio Arce
collection PubMed
description Background:There continues to be focus on the value of regional and neuraxial anesthetic techniques when combined with general anesthesia to improve postoperative analgesia. The reported advantages include decreased postoperative opioid requirements, decreased medication-related adverse effects, decreased hospital length of stay, and increased patient satisfaction. Orthopedic procedures of the hip may be amenable to such techniques as there is significant postoperative pain with the requirement for hospital admission and the administration of parenteral opioids. Given the surgical site, various regional anesthetic techniques may be used to provide analgesia including caudal epidural anesthesia (CEA) or lumbar plexus blockade (LPB). Purpose: The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of LPB versus CEA as an analgesic thechnique for patients undergoing elective hip surgery from the opioid consumption and pain scores perspective. Patients and methods: The current study retrospectively reviews our experience with CEA and LPB for postoperative analgesia after hip surgery in the pediatric population. Regional anesthesia technique was reviewed as well as opioid requirements and pain scores. Results: The study cohort included 61 patients, 29 who received an LPB and 32 who received CEA. No difference was noted in the demographics between the two groups. Intraoperative opioid use was 0.7 (IQR: 0.5, 1.1) mg/kg of oral morphine equivalents (MEs) in the LPB group compared to 0.6 (IQR: 0.5, 0.9) in the CEA group (p=0.479). Postoperative opioid use over the first 48 hrs was 4 (IQR: 1, 6) mg/kg of oral ME in the LPB group, compared to 2 (interquartile range [IQR]: 1, 3) in the CEA group (p=0.103). Over the first 24 hrs after surgery, the median pain score in the LPB group was 5 (IQR: 1–6), compared to 3 (IQR: 0, 5) in the CEA group (p=0.014).Conclusion: These retrospective data suggest a modest postoperative benefit of CEA when compared to LPB following hip surgery in the pediatric population. Postoperative pain scores were lower in patients receiving CEA; however, no difference in the intraoperative or postoperative opioid requirements was noted between the two groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6498965
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64989652019-05-22 Evaluation of postoperative analgesia in pediatric patients after hip surgery: lumbar plexus versus caudal epidural analgesia Villalobos, Mauricio Arce Veneziano, Giorgio Miller, Rebecca Beltran, Ralph J Krishna, Senthil Tumin, Dmitry Klingele, Kevin Tobias, Joseph D J Pain Res Original Research Background:There continues to be focus on the value of regional and neuraxial anesthetic techniques when combined with general anesthesia to improve postoperative analgesia. The reported advantages include decreased postoperative opioid requirements, decreased medication-related adverse effects, decreased hospital length of stay, and increased patient satisfaction. Orthopedic procedures of the hip may be amenable to such techniques as there is significant postoperative pain with the requirement for hospital admission and the administration of parenteral opioids. Given the surgical site, various regional anesthetic techniques may be used to provide analgesia including caudal epidural anesthesia (CEA) or lumbar plexus blockade (LPB). Purpose: The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of LPB versus CEA as an analgesic thechnique for patients undergoing elective hip surgery from the opioid consumption and pain scores perspective. Patients and methods: The current study retrospectively reviews our experience with CEA and LPB for postoperative analgesia after hip surgery in the pediatric population. Regional anesthesia technique was reviewed as well as opioid requirements and pain scores. Results: The study cohort included 61 patients, 29 who received an LPB and 32 who received CEA. No difference was noted in the demographics between the two groups. Intraoperative opioid use was 0.7 (IQR: 0.5, 1.1) mg/kg of oral morphine equivalents (MEs) in the LPB group compared to 0.6 (IQR: 0.5, 0.9) in the CEA group (p=0.479). Postoperative opioid use over the first 48 hrs was 4 (IQR: 1, 6) mg/kg of oral ME in the LPB group, compared to 2 (interquartile range [IQR]: 1, 3) in the CEA group (p=0.103). Over the first 24 hrs after surgery, the median pain score in the LPB group was 5 (IQR: 1–6), compared to 3 (IQR: 0, 5) in the CEA group (p=0.014).Conclusion: These retrospective data suggest a modest postoperative benefit of CEA when compared to LPB following hip surgery in the pediatric population. Postoperative pain scores were lower in patients receiving CEA; however, no difference in the intraoperative or postoperative opioid requirements was noted between the two groups. Dove 2019-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6498965/ /pubmed/31118744 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S191945 Text en © 2019 Arce Villalobos et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Villalobos, Mauricio Arce
Veneziano, Giorgio
Miller, Rebecca
Beltran, Ralph J
Krishna, Senthil
Tumin, Dmitry
Klingele, Kevin
Tobias, Joseph D
Evaluation of postoperative analgesia in pediatric patients after hip surgery: lumbar plexus versus caudal epidural analgesia
title Evaluation of postoperative analgesia in pediatric patients after hip surgery: lumbar plexus versus caudal epidural analgesia
title_full Evaluation of postoperative analgesia in pediatric patients after hip surgery: lumbar plexus versus caudal epidural analgesia
title_fullStr Evaluation of postoperative analgesia in pediatric patients after hip surgery: lumbar plexus versus caudal epidural analgesia
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of postoperative analgesia in pediatric patients after hip surgery: lumbar plexus versus caudal epidural analgesia
title_short Evaluation of postoperative analgesia in pediatric patients after hip surgery: lumbar plexus versus caudal epidural analgesia
title_sort evaluation of postoperative analgesia in pediatric patients after hip surgery: lumbar plexus versus caudal epidural analgesia
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6498965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31118744
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S191945
work_keys_str_mv AT villalobosmauricioarce evaluationofpostoperativeanalgesiainpediatricpatientsafterhipsurgerylumbarplexusversuscaudalepiduralanalgesia
AT venezianogiorgio evaluationofpostoperativeanalgesiainpediatricpatientsafterhipsurgerylumbarplexusversuscaudalepiduralanalgesia
AT millerrebecca evaluationofpostoperativeanalgesiainpediatricpatientsafterhipsurgerylumbarplexusversuscaudalepiduralanalgesia
AT beltranralphj evaluationofpostoperativeanalgesiainpediatricpatientsafterhipsurgerylumbarplexusversuscaudalepiduralanalgesia
AT krishnasenthil evaluationofpostoperativeanalgesiainpediatricpatientsafterhipsurgerylumbarplexusversuscaudalepiduralanalgesia
AT tumindmitry evaluationofpostoperativeanalgesiainpediatricpatientsafterhipsurgerylumbarplexusversuscaudalepiduralanalgesia
AT klingelekevin evaluationofpostoperativeanalgesiainpediatricpatientsafterhipsurgerylumbarplexusversuscaudalepiduralanalgesia
AT tobiasjosephd evaluationofpostoperativeanalgesiainpediatricpatientsafterhipsurgerylumbarplexusversuscaudalepiduralanalgesia