Cargando…

A Multiple Definitions Model of Classification Into Fuzzy Categories

This paper describes a new hypothesis, referred to as the multiple definitions model, concerning the mental representation of fuzzy concepts. The basic claim of the model is that such concepts are represented as a set of multiple definitions, where each definition is exact. Fuzziness results from th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Gruenenfelder, Thomas M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6498969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31105628
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00944
_version_ 1783415719952646144
author Gruenenfelder, Thomas M.
author_facet Gruenenfelder, Thomas M.
author_sort Gruenenfelder, Thomas M.
collection PubMed
description This paper describes a new hypothesis, referred to as the multiple definitions model, concerning the mental representation of fuzzy concepts. The basic claim of the model is that such concepts are represented as a set of multiple definitions, where each definition is exact. Fuzziness results from the fact that using such concepts requires sampling multiple such exact definitions of the concept. The model was applied to concepts that can be defined as a range of values over a single dimension (such as middle-age), and tested using conjunctions and disjunctions of middle-age (e.g., “A person is middle-aged at both 50 and 63.”). The model predicts that, controlling for the truths of individual ages, the truths of conjunctions involving ages that are close together will be judged higher than the truths of conjunctions involving ages farther apart, and that the opposite effect will occur for disjunctions (the distance effect). The results of two experiments confirmed this prediction. However, both experiments also found that conjunctions were judged truer than the less true of their component ages, and that disjunctions were judged less true than the truer of their component ages. The model does not predict this “minimax” effect. One possible explanation of the minimax effect was tested; another modeled. The overall conclusion is that the multiple definitions model is a viable contender to explain the distance effect. The minimax effect, however, is still in need of a satisfactory explanation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6498969
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64989692019-05-17 A Multiple Definitions Model of Classification Into Fuzzy Categories Gruenenfelder, Thomas M. Front Psychol Psychology This paper describes a new hypothesis, referred to as the multiple definitions model, concerning the mental representation of fuzzy concepts. The basic claim of the model is that such concepts are represented as a set of multiple definitions, where each definition is exact. Fuzziness results from the fact that using such concepts requires sampling multiple such exact definitions of the concept. The model was applied to concepts that can be defined as a range of values over a single dimension (such as middle-age), and tested using conjunctions and disjunctions of middle-age (e.g., “A person is middle-aged at both 50 and 63.”). The model predicts that, controlling for the truths of individual ages, the truths of conjunctions involving ages that are close together will be judged higher than the truths of conjunctions involving ages farther apart, and that the opposite effect will occur for disjunctions (the distance effect). The results of two experiments confirmed this prediction. However, both experiments also found that conjunctions were judged truer than the less true of their component ages, and that disjunctions were judged less true than the truer of their component ages. The model does not predict this “minimax” effect. One possible explanation of the minimax effect was tested; another modeled. The overall conclusion is that the multiple definitions model is a viable contender to explain the distance effect. The minimax effect, however, is still in need of a satisfactory explanation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6498969/ /pubmed/31105628 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00944 Text en Copyright © 2019 Gruenenfelder. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Gruenenfelder, Thomas M.
A Multiple Definitions Model of Classification Into Fuzzy Categories
title A Multiple Definitions Model of Classification Into Fuzzy Categories
title_full A Multiple Definitions Model of Classification Into Fuzzy Categories
title_fullStr A Multiple Definitions Model of Classification Into Fuzzy Categories
title_full_unstemmed A Multiple Definitions Model of Classification Into Fuzzy Categories
title_short A Multiple Definitions Model of Classification Into Fuzzy Categories
title_sort multiple definitions model of classification into fuzzy categories
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6498969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31105628
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00944
work_keys_str_mv AT gruenenfelderthomasm amultipledefinitionsmodelofclassificationintofuzzycategories
AT gruenenfelderthomasm multipledefinitionsmodelofclassificationintofuzzycategories