Cargando…

Comparing imaging, acoustics, and radar to monitor Leach’s storm-petrel colonies

Seabirds are integral components of marine ecosystems and, with many populations globally threatened, there is a critical need for effective and scalable seabird monitoring strategies. Many seabird species nest in burrows, which can make traditional monitoring methods costly, infeasible, or damaging...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Orben, Rachael A., Fleishman, Abram B., Borker, Abraham L., Bridgeland, William, Gladics, Amanda J., Porquez, Jessica, Sanzenbacher, Peter, Stephensen, Shawn W., Swift, Roberta, McKown, Matthew W., Suryan, Robert M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6499055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31106046
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6721
_version_ 1783415735466328064
author Orben, Rachael A.
Fleishman, Abram B.
Borker, Abraham L.
Bridgeland, William
Gladics, Amanda J.
Porquez, Jessica
Sanzenbacher, Peter
Stephensen, Shawn W.
Swift, Roberta
McKown, Matthew W.
Suryan, Robert M.
author_facet Orben, Rachael A.
Fleishman, Abram B.
Borker, Abraham L.
Bridgeland, William
Gladics, Amanda J.
Porquez, Jessica
Sanzenbacher, Peter
Stephensen, Shawn W.
Swift, Roberta
McKown, Matthew W.
Suryan, Robert M.
author_sort Orben, Rachael A.
collection PubMed
description Seabirds are integral components of marine ecosystems and, with many populations globally threatened, there is a critical need for effective and scalable seabird monitoring strategies. Many seabird species nest in burrows, which can make traditional monitoring methods costly, infeasible, or damaging to nesting habitats. Traditional burrow occupancy surveys, where possible, can occur infrequently and therefore lead to an incomplete understanding of population trends. For example, in Oregon, during the last three decades there have been large changes in the abundance of Leach’s storm-petrels (Hydrobates leucorhoa), which included drastic declines at some colonies. Unfortunately, traditional monitoring failed to capture the timing and magnitude of change, limiting managers’ ability to determine causes of the decline and curtailing management options. New, easily repeatable methods of quantifying relative abundance are needed. For this study, we tested three methods of remote monitoring: passive acoustic monitoring, time-lapse cameras, and radar. Abundance indices derived from acoustics and imagery: call rates, acoustic energy, and counts were significantly related to traditional estimates of burrow occupancy of Leach’s storm-petrels. Due to sampling limitations, we were unable to compare radar to burrow occupancy. Image counts were significantly correlated with all other indices, including radar, while indices derived from acoustics and radar were not correlated. Acoustic data likely reflect different aspects of the population and hold the potential for the further development of indices to disentangle phenology, attendance of breeding birds, and reproductive success. We found that image counts are comparable with standard methods (e.g., radar) in producing annual abundance indices. We recommend that managers consider a sampling scheme that incorporates both acoustics and imaging, but for sites inaccessible to humans, radar remains the sole option. Implementation of acoustic and camera based monitoring programs will provide much needed information for a vulnerable group of seabirds.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6499055
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64990552019-05-17 Comparing imaging, acoustics, and radar to monitor Leach’s storm-petrel colonies Orben, Rachael A. Fleishman, Abram B. Borker, Abraham L. Bridgeland, William Gladics, Amanda J. Porquez, Jessica Sanzenbacher, Peter Stephensen, Shawn W. Swift, Roberta McKown, Matthew W. Suryan, Robert M. PeerJ Animal Behavior Seabirds are integral components of marine ecosystems and, with many populations globally threatened, there is a critical need for effective and scalable seabird monitoring strategies. Many seabird species nest in burrows, which can make traditional monitoring methods costly, infeasible, or damaging to nesting habitats. Traditional burrow occupancy surveys, where possible, can occur infrequently and therefore lead to an incomplete understanding of population trends. For example, in Oregon, during the last three decades there have been large changes in the abundance of Leach’s storm-petrels (Hydrobates leucorhoa), which included drastic declines at some colonies. Unfortunately, traditional monitoring failed to capture the timing and magnitude of change, limiting managers’ ability to determine causes of the decline and curtailing management options. New, easily repeatable methods of quantifying relative abundance are needed. For this study, we tested three methods of remote monitoring: passive acoustic monitoring, time-lapse cameras, and radar. Abundance indices derived from acoustics and imagery: call rates, acoustic energy, and counts were significantly related to traditional estimates of burrow occupancy of Leach’s storm-petrels. Due to sampling limitations, we were unable to compare radar to burrow occupancy. Image counts were significantly correlated with all other indices, including radar, while indices derived from acoustics and radar were not correlated. Acoustic data likely reflect different aspects of the population and hold the potential for the further development of indices to disentangle phenology, attendance of breeding birds, and reproductive success. We found that image counts are comparable with standard methods (e.g., radar) in producing annual abundance indices. We recommend that managers consider a sampling scheme that incorporates both acoustics and imaging, but for sites inaccessible to humans, radar remains the sole option. Implementation of acoustic and camera based monitoring programs will provide much needed information for a vulnerable group of seabirds. PeerJ Inc. 2019-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6499055/ /pubmed/31106046 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6721 Text en ©2019 Orben et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Animal Behavior
Orben, Rachael A.
Fleishman, Abram B.
Borker, Abraham L.
Bridgeland, William
Gladics, Amanda J.
Porquez, Jessica
Sanzenbacher, Peter
Stephensen, Shawn W.
Swift, Roberta
McKown, Matthew W.
Suryan, Robert M.
Comparing imaging, acoustics, and radar to monitor Leach’s storm-petrel colonies
title Comparing imaging, acoustics, and radar to monitor Leach’s storm-petrel colonies
title_full Comparing imaging, acoustics, and radar to monitor Leach’s storm-petrel colonies
title_fullStr Comparing imaging, acoustics, and radar to monitor Leach’s storm-petrel colonies
title_full_unstemmed Comparing imaging, acoustics, and radar to monitor Leach’s storm-petrel colonies
title_short Comparing imaging, acoustics, and radar to monitor Leach’s storm-petrel colonies
title_sort comparing imaging, acoustics, and radar to monitor leach’s storm-petrel colonies
topic Animal Behavior
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6499055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31106046
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6721
work_keys_str_mv AT orbenrachaela comparingimagingacousticsandradartomonitorleachsstormpetrelcolonies
AT fleishmanabramb comparingimagingacousticsandradartomonitorleachsstormpetrelcolonies
AT borkerabrahaml comparingimagingacousticsandradartomonitorleachsstormpetrelcolonies
AT bridgelandwilliam comparingimagingacousticsandradartomonitorleachsstormpetrelcolonies
AT gladicsamandaj comparingimagingacousticsandradartomonitorleachsstormpetrelcolonies
AT porquezjessica comparingimagingacousticsandradartomonitorleachsstormpetrelcolonies
AT sanzenbacherpeter comparingimagingacousticsandradartomonitorleachsstormpetrelcolonies
AT stephensenshawnw comparingimagingacousticsandradartomonitorleachsstormpetrelcolonies
AT swiftroberta comparingimagingacousticsandradartomonitorleachsstormpetrelcolonies
AT mckownmattheww comparingimagingacousticsandradartomonitorleachsstormpetrelcolonies
AT suryanrobertm comparingimagingacousticsandradartomonitorleachsstormpetrelcolonies