Cargando…

Blind working time in visual display terminal users

OBJECTIVES: Blind working (BW) time (time during which vision is not required), the interblink interval (IBI), and subjective symptoms were investigated in workers using visual display terminals (VDTs). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: To investigate BW time, 10 VDT users were instructed to close their eyes wh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fujita, Hiroki, Sano, Kenji, Baba, Tomio, Tanaka, Tadashi, Ohno‐Matsui, Kyoko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6499340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30866126
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1348-9585.12027
_version_ 1783415777041317888
author Fujita, Hiroki
Sano, Kenji
Baba, Tomio
Tanaka, Tadashi
Ohno‐Matsui, Kyoko
author_facet Fujita, Hiroki
Sano, Kenji
Baba, Tomio
Tanaka, Tadashi
Ohno‐Matsui, Kyoko
author_sort Fujita, Hiroki
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Blind working (BW) time (time during which vision is not required), the interblink interval (IBI), and subjective symptoms were investigated in workers using visual display terminals (VDTs). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: To investigate BW time, 10 VDT users were instructed to close their eyes when this did not interfere with their work. They were video recorded for 60 minutes using a webcam attached to the display on which they were engaged in regular data input tasks, and BW time was measured. The values of the IBI during the final 20 minutes of the BW experiment and during the final 20 minutes of normal working without BW were compared. A questionnaire was administered to investigate subjective symptoms using a visual analogue scale. RESULTS: The total BW time during the final 20‐minute period was 20.6‐121.0 seconds (1.7%‐10.1%). The mean IBI of 5.5 ± 4.5 seconds during the BW experiment was not significantly different from that of 6.2 ± 5.6 seconds during normal working, and the mean of three IBIs immediately after BW during the BW experiment was 2.7 ± 1.0 seconds, significantly shorter than the 6.2 ± 5.6 seconds during normal working. Dry eye, ocular fatigue, and blurred vision during normal working improved when subjects were engaged in BW. CONCLUSIONS: VDT users could engage in BW during VDT work, the IBI was shorter immediately after BW, and subjective symptoms improved. These results suggest that BW may provide a more effective measure for the management of VDT working time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6499340
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64993402019-05-07 Blind working time in visual display terminal users Fujita, Hiroki Sano, Kenji Baba, Tomio Tanaka, Tadashi Ohno‐Matsui, Kyoko J Occup Health Originals OBJECTIVES: Blind working (BW) time (time during which vision is not required), the interblink interval (IBI), and subjective symptoms were investigated in workers using visual display terminals (VDTs). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: To investigate BW time, 10 VDT users were instructed to close their eyes when this did not interfere with their work. They were video recorded for 60 minutes using a webcam attached to the display on which they were engaged in regular data input tasks, and BW time was measured. The values of the IBI during the final 20 minutes of the BW experiment and during the final 20 minutes of normal working without BW were compared. A questionnaire was administered to investigate subjective symptoms using a visual analogue scale. RESULTS: The total BW time during the final 20‐minute period was 20.6‐121.0 seconds (1.7%‐10.1%). The mean IBI of 5.5 ± 4.5 seconds during the BW experiment was not significantly different from that of 6.2 ± 5.6 seconds during normal working, and the mean of three IBIs immediately after BW during the BW experiment was 2.7 ± 1.0 seconds, significantly shorter than the 6.2 ± 5.6 seconds during normal working. Dry eye, ocular fatigue, and blurred vision during normal working improved when subjects were engaged in BW. CONCLUSIONS: VDT users could engage in BW during VDT work, the IBI was shorter immediately after BW, and subjective symptoms improved. These results suggest that BW may provide a more effective measure for the management of VDT working time. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6499340/ /pubmed/30866126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1348-9585.12027 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Occupational Health published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japan Society for Occupational Health This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Originals
Fujita, Hiroki
Sano, Kenji
Baba, Tomio
Tanaka, Tadashi
Ohno‐Matsui, Kyoko
Blind working time in visual display terminal users
title Blind working time in visual display terminal users
title_full Blind working time in visual display terminal users
title_fullStr Blind working time in visual display terminal users
title_full_unstemmed Blind working time in visual display terminal users
title_short Blind working time in visual display terminal users
title_sort blind working time in visual display terminal users
topic Originals
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6499340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30866126
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1348-9585.12027
work_keys_str_mv AT fujitahiroki blindworkingtimeinvisualdisplayterminalusers
AT sanokenji blindworkingtimeinvisualdisplayterminalusers
AT babatomio blindworkingtimeinvisualdisplayterminalusers
AT tanakatadashi blindworkingtimeinvisualdisplayterminalusers
AT ohnomatsuikyoko blindworkingtimeinvisualdisplayterminalusers