Cargando…

Electroconvulsive therapy electrode placement for bipolar state-related targeted engagement

BACKGROUND: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective treatment for all bipolar states. However, ECT remains underutilized, likely stemming from stigma and the risk of neurocognitive impairment. Neuroimaging research has identified state-specific areas of aberrant brain activity that may serve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abbott, Christopher C., Miller, Jeremy, Lloyd, Megan, Tohen, Mauricio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6499851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31053985
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40345-019-0146-z
_version_ 1783415839724142592
author Abbott, Christopher C.
Miller, Jeremy
Lloyd, Megan
Tohen, Mauricio
author_facet Abbott, Christopher C.
Miller, Jeremy
Lloyd, Megan
Tohen, Mauricio
author_sort Abbott, Christopher C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective treatment for all bipolar states. However, ECT remains underutilized, likely stemming from stigma and the risk of neurocognitive impairment. Neuroimaging research has identified state-specific areas of aberrant brain activity that may serve as targets for therapeutic brain stimulation. Electrode placement determines the geometry of the electric field and can be either non-focal (bitemporal) or more focal (right unilateral or bifrontal). Previous research has shown that electrode placement can impact clinical and cognitive outcomes independent of seizure activity. This review critically examines the evidence that focal (unilateral or bifrontal) electrode placements target specific aberrant circuitry in specific bipolar states to optimize clinical outcomes. We hypothesize that optimal target engagement for a bipolar state will be associated with equivalent efficacy relative to bitemporal non-focal stimulation with less neurocognitive impairment. METHODS: We performed a literature search in the PubMed database. Inclusion criteria included prospective, longitudinal investigations during the ECT series with specific electrode placements within a bipolar state from 2000 to 2018. RESULTS: We identified investigations that met our inclusion criteria with bipolar mania (n = 6), depression (n = 6), mixed (n = 3) and catatonia (n = 1) states. These studies included clinical outcomes and several included cognitive outcomes, which were discussed separately. CONCLUSIONS: While the heterogeneity of the studies makes comparisons difficult, important patterns included the reduced cognitive side effects, faster rate of response, and equivalent efficacy rates of the focal electrode placements (right unilateral and bifrontal) when compared to non-focal (bitemporal) placement. Further avenues for research include more robust cognitive assessments to separate procedure-related and state-related impairment. In addition, future studies could investigate novel electrode configurations with more specific target engagement for different bipolar states.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6499851
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64998512019-05-21 Electroconvulsive therapy electrode placement for bipolar state-related targeted engagement Abbott, Christopher C. Miller, Jeremy Lloyd, Megan Tohen, Mauricio Int J Bipolar Disord Review BACKGROUND: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective treatment for all bipolar states. However, ECT remains underutilized, likely stemming from stigma and the risk of neurocognitive impairment. Neuroimaging research has identified state-specific areas of aberrant brain activity that may serve as targets for therapeutic brain stimulation. Electrode placement determines the geometry of the electric field and can be either non-focal (bitemporal) or more focal (right unilateral or bifrontal). Previous research has shown that electrode placement can impact clinical and cognitive outcomes independent of seizure activity. This review critically examines the evidence that focal (unilateral or bifrontal) electrode placements target specific aberrant circuitry in specific bipolar states to optimize clinical outcomes. We hypothesize that optimal target engagement for a bipolar state will be associated with equivalent efficacy relative to bitemporal non-focal stimulation with less neurocognitive impairment. METHODS: We performed a literature search in the PubMed database. Inclusion criteria included prospective, longitudinal investigations during the ECT series with specific electrode placements within a bipolar state from 2000 to 2018. RESULTS: We identified investigations that met our inclusion criteria with bipolar mania (n = 6), depression (n = 6), mixed (n = 3) and catatonia (n = 1) states. These studies included clinical outcomes and several included cognitive outcomes, which were discussed separately. CONCLUSIONS: While the heterogeneity of the studies makes comparisons difficult, important patterns included the reduced cognitive side effects, faster rate of response, and equivalent efficacy rates of the focal electrode placements (right unilateral and bifrontal) when compared to non-focal (bitemporal) placement. Further avenues for research include more robust cognitive assessments to separate procedure-related and state-related impairment. In addition, future studies could investigate novel electrode configurations with more specific target engagement for different bipolar states. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6499851/ /pubmed/31053985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40345-019-0146-z Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review
Abbott, Christopher C.
Miller, Jeremy
Lloyd, Megan
Tohen, Mauricio
Electroconvulsive therapy electrode placement for bipolar state-related targeted engagement
title Electroconvulsive therapy electrode placement for bipolar state-related targeted engagement
title_full Electroconvulsive therapy electrode placement for bipolar state-related targeted engagement
title_fullStr Electroconvulsive therapy electrode placement for bipolar state-related targeted engagement
title_full_unstemmed Electroconvulsive therapy electrode placement for bipolar state-related targeted engagement
title_short Electroconvulsive therapy electrode placement for bipolar state-related targeted engagement
title_sort electroconvulsive therapy electrode placement for bipolar state-related targeted engagement
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6499851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31053985
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40345-019-0146-z
work_keys_str_mv AT abbottchristopherc electroconvulsivetherapyelectrodeplacementforbipolarstaterelatedtargetedengagement
AT millerjeremy electroconvulsivetherapyelectrodeplacementforbipolarstaterelatedtargetedengagement
AT lloydmegan electroconvulsivetherapyelectrodeplacementforbipolarstaterelatedtargetedengagement
AT tohenmauricio electroconvulsivetherapyelectrodeplacementforbipolarstaterelatedtargetedengagement