Cargando…
Electroconvulsive therapy electrode placement for bipolar state-related targeted engagement
BACKGROUND: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective treatment for all bipolar states. However, ECT remains underutilized, likely stemming from stigma and the risk of neurocognitive impairment. Neuroimaging research has identified state-specific areas of aberrant brain activity that may serve...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6499851/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31053985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40345-019-0146-z |
_version_ | 1783415839724142592 |
---|---|
author | Abbott, Christopher C. Miller, Jeremy Lloyd, Megan Tohen, Mauricio |
author_facet | Abbott, Christopher C. Miller, Jeremy Lloyd, Megan Tohen, Mauricio |
author_sort | Abbott, Christopher C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective treatment for all bipolar states. However, ECT remains underutilized, likely stemming from stigma and the risk of neurocognitive impairment. Neuroimaging research has identified state-specific areas of aberrant brain activity that may serve as targets for therapeutic brain stimulation. Electrode placement determines the geometry of the electric field and can be either non-focal (bitemporal) or more focal (right unilateral or bifrontal). Previous research has shown that electrode placement can impact clinical and cognitive outcomes independent of seizure activity. This review critically examines the evidence that focal (unilateral or bifrontal) electrode placements target specific aberrant circuitry in specific bipolar states to optimize clinical outcomes. We hypothesize that optimal target engagement for a bipolar state will be associated with equivalent efficacy relative to bitemporal non-focal stimulation with less neurocognitive impairment. METHODS: We performed a literature search in the PubMed database. Inclusion criteria included prospective, longitudinal investigations during the ECT series with specific electrode placements within a bipolar state from 2000 to 2018. RESULTS: We identified investigations that met our inclusion criteria with bipolar mania (n = 6), depression (n = 6), mixed (n = 3) and catatonia (n = 1) states. These studies included clinical outcomes and several included cognitive outcomes, which were discussed separately. CONCLUSIONS: While the heterogeneity of the studies makes comparisons difficult, important patterns included the reduced cognitive side effects, faster rate of response, and equivalent efficacy rates of the focal electrode placements (right unilateral and bifrontal) when compared to non-focal (bitemporal) placement. Further avenues for research include more robust cognitive assessments to separate procedure-related and state-related impairment. In addition, future studies could investigate novel electrode configurations with more specific target engagement for different bipolar states. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6499851 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64998512019-05-21 Electroconvulsive therapy electrode placement for bipolar state-related targeted engagement Abbott, Christopher C. Miller, Jeremy Lloyd, Megan Tohen, Mauricio Int J Bipolar Disord Review BACKGROUND: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective treatment for all bipolar states. However, ECT remains underutilized, likely stemming from stigma and the risk of neurocognitive impairment. Neuroimaging research has identified state-specific areas of aberrant brain activity that may serve as targets for therapeutic brain stimulation. Electrode placement determines the geometry of the electric field and can be either non-focal (bitemporal) or more focal (right unilateral or bifrontal). Previous research has shown that electrode placement can impact clinical and cognitive outcomes independent of seizure activity. This review critically examines the evidence that focal (unilateral or bifrontal) electrode placements target specific aberrant circuitry in specific bipolar states to optimize clinical outcomes. We hypothesize that optimal target engagement for a bipolar state will be associated with equivalent efficacy relative to bitemporal non-focal stimulation with less neurocognitive impairment. METHODS: We performed a literature search in the PubMed database. Inclusion criteria included prospective, longitudinal investigations during the ECT series with specific electrode placements within a bipolar state from 2000 to 2018. RESULTS: We identified investigations that met our inclusion criteria with bipolar mania (n = 6), depression (n = 6), mixed (n = 3) and catatonia (n = 1) states. These studies included clinical outcomes and several included cognitive outcomes, which were discussed separately. CONCLUSIONS: While the heterogeneity of the studies makes comparisons difficult, important patterns included the reduced cognitive side effects, faster rate of response, and equivalent efficacy rates of the focal electrode placements (right unilateral and bifrontal) when compared to non-focal (bitemporal) placement. Further avenues for research include more robust cognitive assessments to separate procedure-related and state-related impairment. In addition, future studies could investigate novel electrode configurations with more specific target engagement for different bipolar states. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6499851/ /pubmed/31053985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40345-019-0146-z Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Review Abbott, Christopher C. Miller, Jeremy Lloyd, Megan Tohen, Mauricio Electroconvulsive therapy electrode placement for bipolar state-related targeted engagement |
title | Electroconvulsive therapy electrode placement for bipolar state-related targeted engagement |
title_full | Electroconvulsive therapy electrode placement for bipolar state-related targeted engagement |
title_fullStr | Electroconvulsive therapy electrode placement for bipolar state-related targeted engagement |
title_full_unstemmed | Electroconvulsive therapy electrode placement for bipolar state-related targeted engagement |
title_short | Electroconvulsive therapy electrode placement for bipolar state-related targeted engagement |
title_sort | electroconvulsive therapy electrode placement for bipolar state-related targeted engagement |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6499851/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31053985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40345-019-0146-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abbottchristopherc electroconvulsivetherapyelectrodeplacementforbipolarstaterelatedtargetedengagement AT millerjeremy electroconvulsivetherapyelectrodeplacementforbipolarstaterelatedtargetedengagement AT lloydmegan electroconvulsivetherapyelectrodeplacementforbipolarstaterelatedtargetedengagement AT tohenmauricio electroconvulsivetherapyelectrodeplacementforbipolarstaterelatedtargetedengagement |