Cargando…

A systematic review of the long-term efficacy of low-intensity shockwave therapy for vasculogenic erectile dysfunction

PURPOSE: To look at the evidence base for LISWT as a treatment modality for vasculogenic erectile dysfunction, focusing on the long-term outcomes at over 6 months following treatment. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted utilising MEDLINE and Scopus databases from 2010 to September...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brunckhorst, Oliver, Wells, Lauren, Teeling, Fiona, Muir, Gordon, Muneer, Asif, Ahmed, Kamran
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6499893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30903393
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11255-019-02127-z
_version_ 1783415846081658880
author Brunckhorst, Oliver
Wells, Lauren
Teeling, Fiona
Muir, Gordon
Muneer, Asif
Ahmed, Kamran
author_facet Brunckhorst, Oliver
Wells, Lauren
Teeling, Fiona
Muir, Gordon
Muneer, Asif
Ahmed, Kamran
author_sort Brunckhorst, Oliver
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To look at the evidence base for LISWT as a treatment modality for vasculogenic erectile dysfunction, focusing on the long-term outcomes at over 6 months following treatment. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted utilising MEDLINE and Scopus databases from 2010 to September 2018 by two independent reviewers. Outcome measures extracted for long-term efficacy included International Index of Erectile Function scores and Erection Hardness Scores. Subgroup analysis for LISWT effectiveness included age, PDE5i responsiveness, presence of vascular co-morbidities and smoking status. RESULTS: The search identified eleven studies, representing a total of 799 patients. Nine studies found a significant improvement in erectile function after LISWT at 6-month follow-up (median IIEF-EF improvement in 5.3 at 6 months). However, of five studies assessing erectile function at 12 months; two identified a plateauing of results, with three a deterioration (IIEF-EF score changes of − 2 to 0.1 from 6 months). Erectile function did, however, remain above baseline results in all of these studies. Subgroup analysis revealed increasing age to reduce the response to LISWT treatment. Whilst ED severity, PDE5i responsiveness and co-morbidities potentially influence effectiveness, results are still inconsistent. CONCLUSIONS: LISWT may be a safe and acceptable potential ED treatment with demonstrated benefits at 6 months. There is some question regarding efficacy deterioration beyond this, but there is still a demonstrated benefit seen even at 12 months post treatment. However, quality of evidence remains low with larger multiinstitutional studies required, standardising confounders such as shockwave administration and oral medication use. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11255-019-02127-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6499893
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64998932019-05-20 A systematic review of the long-term efficacy of low-intensity shockwave therapy for vasculogenic erectile dysfunction Brunckhorst, Oliver Wells, Lauren Teeling, Fiona Muir, Gordon Muneer, Asif Ahmed, Kamran Int Urol Nephrol Urology - Review PURPOSE: To look at the evidence base for LISWT as a treatment modality for vasculogenic erectile dysfunction, focusing on the long-term outcomes at over 6 months following treatment. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted utilising MEDLINE and Scopus databases from 2010 to September 2018 by two independent reviewers. Outcome measures extracted for long-term efficacy included International Index of Erectile Function scores and Erection Hardness Scores. Subgroup analysis for LISWT effectiveness included age, PDE5i responsiveness, presence of vascular co-morbidities and smoking status. RESULTS: The search identified eleven studies, representing a total of 799 patients. Nine studies found a significant improvement in erectile function after LISWT at 6-month follow-up (median IIEF-EF improvement in 5.3 at 6 months). However, of five studies assessing erectile function at 12 months; two identified a plateauing of results, with three a deterioration (IIEF-EF score changes of − 2 to 0.1 from 6 months). Erectile function did, however, remain above baseline results in all of these studies. Subgroup analysis revealed increasing age to reduce the response to LISWT treatment. Whilst ED severity, PDE5i responsiveness and co-morbidities potentially influence effectiveness, results are still inconsistent. CONCLUSIONS: LISWT may be a safe and acceptable potential ED treatment with demonstrated benefits at 6 months. There is some question regarding efficacy deterioration beyond this, but there is still a demonstrated benefit seen even at 12 months post treatment. However, quality of evidence remains low with larger multiinstitutional studies required, standardising confounders such as shockwave administration and oral medication use. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11255-019-02127-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Netherlands 2019-03-22 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6499893/ /pubmed/30903393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11255-019-02127-z Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Urology - Review
Brunckhorst, Oliver
Wells, Lauren
Teeling, Fiona
Muir, Gordon
Muneer, Asif
Ahmed, Kamran
A systematic review of the long-term efficacy of low-intensity shockwave therapy for vasculogenic erectile dysfunction
title A systematic review of the long-term efficacy of low-intensity shockwave therapy for vasculogenic erectile dysfunction
title_full A systematic review of the long-term efficacy of low-intensity shockwave therapy for vasculogenic erectile dysfunction
title_fullStr A systematic review of the long-term efficacy of low-intensity shockwave therapy for vasculogenic erectile dysfunction
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review of the long-term efficacy of low-intensity shockwave therapy for vasculogenic erectile dysfunction
title_short A systematic review of the long-term efficacy of low-intensity shockwave therapy for vasculogenic erectile dysfunction
title_sort systematic review of the long-term efficacy of low-intensity shockwave therapy for vasculogenic erectile dysfunction
topic Urology - Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6499893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30903393
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11255-019-02127-z
work_keys_str_mv AT brunckhorstoliver asystematicreviewofthelongtermefficacyoflowintensityshockwavetherapyforvasculogenicerectiledysfunction
AT wellslauren asystematicreviewofthelongtermefficacyoflowintensityshockwavetherapyforvasculogenicerectiledysfunction
AT teelingfiona asystematicreviewofthelongtermefficacyoflowintensityshockwavetherapyforvasculogenicerectiledysfunction
AT muirgordon asystematicreviewofthelongtermefficacyoflowintensityshockwavetherapyforvasculogenicerectiledysfunction
AT muneerasif asystematicreviewofthelongtermefficacyoflowintensityshockwavetherapyforvasculogenicerectiledysfunction
AT ahmedkamran asystematicreviewofthelongtermefficacyoflowintensityshockwavetherapyforvasculogenicerectiledysfunction
AT brunckhorstoliver systematicreviewofthelongtermefficacyoflowintensityshockwavetherapyforvasculogenicerectiledysfunction
AT wellslauren systematicreviewofthelongtermefficacyoflowintensityshockwavetherapyforvasculogenicerectiledysfunction
AT teelingfiona systematicreviewofthelongtermefficacyoflowintensityshockwavetherapyforvasculogenicerectiledysfunction
AT muirgordon systematicreviewofthelongtermefficacyoflowintensityshockwavetherapyforvasculogenicerectiledysfunction
AT muneerasif systematicreviewofthelongtermefficacyoflowintensityshockwavetherapyforvasculogenicerectiledysfunction
AT ahmedkamran systematicreviewofthelongtermefficacyoflowintensityshockwavetherapyforvasculogenicerectiledysfunction