Multifactor Assessment of Non-Antimicrobial Soap Performance

A non-antimicrobial soap was benchmarked against 2 reference soaps for microbial removal and skin compatibility, key factors in soap effectiveness and usage. The non-antimicrobial test soap removed more Staphylococcus aureus (P = .024) when applied to nonwetted hands and showed no difference in skin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bingham, James, Cartner, Todd J, Mays Suko, Patricia A, Leslie, Rachel A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Brief Report
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6499895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31065561
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz151
_version_ 1783415846554566656
author Bingham, James
Cartner, Todd J
Mays Suko, Patricia A
Leslie, Rachel A
author_facet Bingham, James
Cartner, Todd J
Mays Suko, Patricia A
Leslie, Rachel A
author_sort Bingham, James
collection PubMed
description A non-antimicrobial soap was benchmarked against 2 reference soaps for microbial removal and skin compatibility, key factors in soap effectiveness and usage. The non-antimicrobial test soap removed more Staphylococcus aureus (P = .024) when applied to nonwetted hands and showed no difference in skin barrier function compared with the reference soaps (P = .736).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6499895
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64998952019-05-07 Multifactor Assessment of Non-Antimicrobial Soap Performance Bingham, James Cartner, Todd J Mays Suko, Patricia A Leslie, Rachel A Open Forum Infect Dis Brief Report A non-antimicrobial soap was benchmarked against 2 reference soaps for microbial removal and skin compatibility, key factors in soap effectiveness and usage. The non-antimicrobial test soap removed more Staphylococcus aureus (P = .024) when applied to nonwetted hands and showed no difference in skin barrier function compared with the reference soaps (P = .736). Oxford University Press 2019-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6499895/ /pubmed/31065561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz151 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Brief Report
Bingham, James
Cartner, Todd J
Mays Suko, Patricia A
Leslie, Rachel A
Multifactor Assessment of Non-Antimicrobial Soap Performance
title Multifactor Assessment of Non-Antimicrobial Soap Performance
title_full Multifactor Assessment of Non-Antimicrobial Soap Performance
title_fullStr Multifactor Assessment of Non-Antimicrobial Soap Performance
title_full_unstemmed Multifactor Assessment of Non-Antimicrobial Soap Performance
title_short Multifactor Assessment of Non-Antimicrobial Soap Performance
title_sort multifactor assessment of non-antimicrobial soap performance
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6499895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31065561
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz151
work_keys_str_mv AT binghamjames multifactorassessmentofnonantimicrobialsoapperformance
AT cartnertoddj multifactorassessmentofnonantimicrobialsoapperformance
AT mayssukopatriciaa multifactorassessmentofnonantimicrobialsoapperformance
AT leslierachela multifactorassessmentofnonantimicrobialsoapperformance

Ejemplares similares