Cargando…

Comparing access to orphan medicinal products in Europe

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to compare the availability and access of orphan medicinal products (OMPs) in the devolved nations in the United Kingdom (UK), France, Germany, Italy and Spain. Availability is defined as the possibility to prescribe OMPs. Access refers to their fu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zamora, Bernarda, Maignen, Francois, O’Neill, Phill, Mestre-Ferrandiz, Jorge, Garau, Martina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6499954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31053154
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-019-1078-5
_version_ 1783415857744969728
author Zamora, Bernarda
Maignen, Francois
O’Neill, Phill
Mestre-Ferrandiz, Jorge
Garau, Martina
author_facet Zamora, Bernarda
Maignen, Francois
O’Neill, Phill
Mestre-Ferrandiz, Jorge
Garau, Martina
author_sort Zamora, Bernarda
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to compare the availability and access of orphan medicinal products (OMPs) in the devolved nations in the United Kingdom (UK), France, Germany, Italy and Spain. Availability is defined as the possibility to prescribe OMPs. Access refers to their full or partial reimbursement by the public health service. METHODS: Data were collated on: marketing authorisations, Health Technology Assessment (HTA) decisions, commissioning, and reimbursement decisions, and respective dates of these events for all the OMPs centrally authorised. Indicators of availability of and access to OMPs were calculated in each country and compared. RESULTS: We found that since the implementation of the OMPs Regulation in 2000 to end of May 2016, 143 OMPs obtained a marketing authorisation in the European Union. These OMPs are most widely accessible in Germany and France. In the other countries between 30 and 60% of OMPs are reimbursed. In particular in England, less than 50% of centrally authorised OMPs are routinely funded by the NHS, with one-third of these recommended by NICE. In Germany reimbursement is automatically granted to all medicines which receive a marketing authorisation, immediately after authorisation – but since 2011, there is an evaluation and potentially a pricing negotiation between companies and sickness funds (third party payers). In the other countries, the shortest time from authorisation to a reimbursement decision is observed in Italy and France where it takes 18.6 and 19.5 months respectively on average. CONCLUSIONS: Marketing authorisation granted to OMPs is only the first step, as medicines reach patients when reimbursement decisions are implemented by national health systems (this applies to non-OMPs too). We found that more than a half of centrally authorised OMPs were available in the five selected countries, but that access to patients was further restricted by different national reimbursement policies, especially in the UK, Italy and Spain. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13023-019-1078-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6499954
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64999542019-05-09 Comparing access to orphan medicinal products in Europe Zamora, Bernarda Maignen, Francois O’Neill, Phill Mestre-Ferrandiz, Jorge Garau, Martina Orphanet J Rare Dis Research OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to compare the availability and access of orphan medicinal products (OMPs) in the devolved nations in the United Kingdom (UK), France, Germany, Italy and Spain. Availability is defined as the possibility to prescribe OMPs. Access refers to their full or partial reimbursement by the public health service. METHODS: Data were collated on: marketing authorisations, Health Technology Assessment (HTA) decisions, commissioning, and reimbursement decisions, and respective dates of these events for all the OMPs centrally authorised. Indicators of availability of and access to OMPs were calculated in each country and compared. RESULTS: We found that since the implementation of the OMPs Regulation in 2000 to end of May 2016, 143 OMPs obtained a marketing authorisation in the European Union. These OMPs are most widely accessible in Germany and France. In the other countries between 30 and 60% of OMPs are reimbursed. In particular in England, less than 50% of centrally authorised OMPs are routinely funded by the NHS, with one-third of these recommended by NICE. In Germany reimbursement is automatically granted to all medicines which receive a marketing authorisation, immediately after authorisation – but since 2011, there is an evaluation and potentially a pricing negotiation between companies and sickness funds (third party payers). In the other countries, the shortest time from authorisation to a reimbursement decision is observed in Italy and France where it takes 18.6 and 19.5 months respectively on average. CONCLUSIONS: Marketing authorisation granted to OMPs is only the first step, as medicines reach patients when reimbursement decisions are implemented by national health systems (this applies to non-OMPs too). We found that more than a half of centrally authorised OMPs were available in the five selected countries, but that access to patients was further restricted by different national reimbursement policies, especially in the UK, Italy and Spain. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13023-019-1078-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6499954/ /pubmed/31053154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-019-1078-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Zamora, Bernarda
Maignen, Francois
O’Neill, Phill
Mestre-Ferrandiz, Jorge
Garau, Martina
Comparing access to orphan medicinal products in Europe
title Comparing access to orphan medicinal products in Europe
title_full Comparing access to orphan medicinal products in Europe
title_fullStr Comparing access to orphan medicinal products in Europe
title_full_unstemmed Comparing access to orphan medicinal products in Europe
title_short Comparing access to orphan medicinal products in Europe
title_sort comparing access to orphan medicinal products in europe
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6499954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31053154
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-019-1078-5
work_keys_str_mv AT zamorabernarda comparingaccesstoorphanmedicinalproductsineurope
AT maignenfrancois comparingaccesstoorphanmedicinalproductsineurope
AT oneillphill comparingaccesstoorphanmedicinalproductsineurope
AT mestreferrandizjorge comparingaccesstoorphanmedicinalproductsineurope
AT garaumartina comparingaccesstoorphanmedicinalproductsineurope