Cargando…

Identifying musculoskeletal conditions in electronic medical records: a prevalence and validation study using the Deliver Primary Healthcare Information (DELPHI) database

BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions are a common presentation in primary care. This study sought to determine the prevalence of MSK conditions in primary care in Ontario and to validate the extent to which health administrative date billing codes accurately represent MSK diagnoses. METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ryan, Bridget L., Maddocks, Heather L., McKay, Scott, Petrella, Robert, Terry, Amanda L., Stewart, Moira
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6499985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31053119
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2568-2
_version_ 1783415864961269760
author Ryan, Bridget L.
Maddocks, Heather L.
McKay, Scott
Petrella, Robert
Terry, Amanda L.
Stewart, Moira
author_facet Ryan, Bridget L.
Maddocks, Heather L.
McKay, Scott
Petrella, Robert
Terry, Amanda L.
Stewart, Moira
author_sort Ryan, Bridget L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions are a common presentation in primary care. This study sought to determine the prevalence of MSK conditions in primary care in Ontario and to validate the extent to which health administrative date billing codes accurately represent MSK diagnoses. METHODS: De-identified electronic medical records (EMR) from the DELPHI database in southwestern Ontario, which contains 2493 patients (55.6% female, mean age 50.3 years (SD = 22.2)) and 21,964 encounters (July 1, 2006-June 30, 2010) were used for the analyses. Outcomes included: validation measures of agreement between International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9) diagnostic codes (health administrative data) and International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC) diagnoses defined as the reference standard, time to first ICD-9 code, prevalence, and healthcare utilization. RESULTS: There were 2940 true positive MSK encounters with primary care practitioners for 998 patients. Performance of the ICD-9 diagnostic codes included sensitivity = 76.5%, specificity = 95.2%, PPV = 94.6%, and NPV = 78.7%, compared to the ICPC reference standard. The majority of 998 patients were coded with both an ICPC and ICD-9 MSK code at their first or second encounter (67.4%). However, 23.5% of patients with the ICPC reference standard MSK were never coded with ICD-9. Four-year prevalence of MSK was 52.3% and varied by age (4.5% 0-17 years, 20.1% 18–44, 42.7% 45–64, and 32.7% 65+). Patients at MSK encounters had a higher number of: investigations (17.9% compared to 9.1%, p < .0001); referrals (17.6% compared to 14.3%, p < .0001); and prescriptions for opioids (17.2% compared to 5.3%, p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: This study determined the prevalence of musculoskeletal conditions in primary care in Ontario using a reference standard definition. The study highlighted the value of using primary care ICPC codes to validate a definition for musculoskeletal conditions. Health administrative data can be used to ascertain the presence of musculoskeletal conditions; however, ICD-9 codes may underrepresent the prevalence of MSK conditions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12891-019-2568-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6499985
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64999852019-05-09 Identifying musculoskeletal conditions in electronic medical records: a prevalence and validation study using the Deliver Primary Healthcare Information (DELPHI) database Ryan, Bridget L. Maddocks, Heather L. McKay, Scott Petrella, Robert Terry, Amanda L. Stewart, Moira BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions are a common presentation in primary care. This study sought to determine the prevalence of MSK conditions in primary care in Ontario and to validate the extent to which health administrative date billing codes accurately represent MSK diagnoses. METHODS: De-identified electronic medical records (EMR) from the DELPHI database in southwestern Ontario, which contains 2493 patients (55.6% female, mean age 50.3 years (SD = 22.2)) and 21,964 encounters (July 1, 2006-June 30, 2010) were used for the analyses. Outcomes included: validation measures of agreement between International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9) diagnostic codes (health administrative data) and International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC) diagnoses defined as the reference standard, time to first ICD-9 code, prevalence, and healthcare utilization. RESULTS: There were 2940 true positive MSK encounters with primary care practitioners for 998 patients. Performance of the ICD-9 diagnostic codes included sensitivity = 76.5%, specificity = 95.2%, PPV = 94.6%, and NPV = 78.7%, compared to the ICPC reference standard. The majority of 998 patients were coded with both an ICPC and ICD-9 MSK code at their first or second encounter (67.4%). However, 23.5% of patients with the ICPC reference standard MSK were never coded with ICD-9. Four-year prevalence of MSK was 52.3% and varied by age (4.5% 0-17 years, 20.1% 18–44, 42.7% 45–64, and 32.7% 65+). Patients at MSK encounters had a higher number of: investigations (17.9% compared to 9.1%, p < .0001); referrals (17.6% compared to 14.3%, p < .0001); and prescriptions for opioids (17.2% compared to 5.3%, p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: This study determined the prevalence of musculoskeletal conditions in primary care in Ontario using a reference standard definition. The study highlighted the value of using primary care ICPC codes to validate a definition for musculoskeletal conditions. Health administrative data can be used to ascertain the presence of musculoskeletal conditions; however, ICD-9 codes may underrepresent the prevalence of MSK conditions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12891-019-2568-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6499985/ /pubmed/31053119 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2568-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ryan, Bridget L.
Maddocks, Heather L.
McKay, Scott
Petrella, Robert
Terry, Amanda L.
Stewart, Moira
Identifying musculoskeletal conditions in electronic medical records: a prevalence and validation study using the Deliver Primary Healthcare Information (DELPHI) database
title Identifying musculoskeletal conditions in electronic medical records: a prevalence and validation study using the Deliver Primary Healthcare Information (DELPHI) database
title_full Identifying musculoskeletal conditions in electronic medical records: a prevalence and validation study using the Deliver Primary Healthcare Information (DELPHI) database
title_fullStr Identifying musculoskeletal conditions in electronic medical records: a prevalence and validation study using the Deliver Primary Healthcare Information (DELPHI) database
title_full_unstemmed Identifying musculoskeletal conditions in electronic medical records: a prevalence and validation study using the Deliver Primary Healthcare Information (DELPHI) database
title_short Identifying musculoskeletal conditions in electronic medical records: a prevalence and validation study using the Deliver Primary Healthcare Information (DELPHI) database
title_sort identifying musculoskeletal conditions in electronic medical records: a prevalence and validation study using the deliver primary healthcare information (delphi) database
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6499985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31053119
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2568-2
work_keys_str_mv AT ryanbridgetl identifyingmusculoskeletalconditionsinelectronicmedicalrecordsaprevalenceandvalidationstudyusingthedeliverprimaryhealthcareinformationdelphidatabase
AT maddocksheatherl identifyingmusculoskeletalconditionsinelectronicmedicalrecordsaprevalenceandvalidationstudyusingthedeliverprimaryhealthcareinformationdelphidatabase
AT mckayscott identifyingmusculoskeletalconditionsinelectronicmedicalrecordsaprevalenceandvalidationstudyusingthedeliverprimaryhealthcareinformationdelphidatabase
AT petrellarobert identifyingmusculoskeletalconditionsinelectronicmedicalrecordsaprevalenceandvalidationstudyusingthedeliverprimaryhealthcareinformationdelphidatabase
AT terryamandal identifyingmusculoskeletalconditionsinelectronicmedicalrecordsaprevalenceandvalidationstudyusingthedeliverprimaryhealthcareinformationdelphidatabase
AT stewartmoira identifyingmusculoskeletalconditionsinelectronicmedicalrecordsaprevalenceandvalidationstudyusingthedeliverprimaryhealthcareinformationdelphidatabase