Cargando…

How to strengthen clinical research in Shenzhen, China: qualitative study

OBJECTIVES: To better understand the strengths and weaknesses, and to propose policy recommendations, regarding conducting high-quality clinical research in Shenzhen, China. DESIGN: A qualitative study conducted from August to November 2016 using a semistructured interview format involving both focu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ji, Ping, Chu, Hongling, Zhang, Chao, Xiao, Ping, Liu, Min, Zhou, Liping, Wang, Haibo, Wang, Yanfang, Wu, Yangfeng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30948572
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024534
_version_ 1783415896836931584
author Ji, Ping
Chu, Hongling
Zhang, Chao
Xiao, Ping
Liu, Min
Zhou, Liping
Wang, Haibo
Wang, Yanfang
Wu, Yangfeng
author_facet Ji, Ping
Chu, Hongling
Zhang, Chao
Xiao, Ping
Liu, Min
Zhou, Liping
Wang, Haibo
Wang, Yanfang
Wu, Yangfeng
author_sort Ji, Ping
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To better understand the strengths and weaknesses, and to propose policy recommendations, regarding conducting high-quality clinical research in Shenzhen, China. DESIGN: A qualitative study conducted from August to November 2016 using a semistructured interview format involving both focus group interviews and individual interviews. SETTING: Shenzhen, China. PARTICIPANTS: Stratified purposive and convenience sampling were used. Thirty individuals experienced in conducting and managing clinical research were selected from key stakeholder groups, comprising 11 from local hospitals, 14 from pharmaceutical/medical device companies and 5 from government agencies. METHODS: A semistructured interview guide was developed by the study group and used by experienced interviewers in focus group discussions and individual interviews. The interviewees were encouraged to share their opinions freely and discuss their own topics of interest during the interviews. Thematic analysis was used for analysis and all data were coded and extracted using NVivo V.11.0 software. RESULTS: Favourable driving factors for clinical research in Shenzhen identified by all stakeholders included the recent trend of increased governmental funding for clinical research, supportive governmental policies, wide recognition of the value of clinical research and high demands from local industry. The major challenges include a lack of technical infrastructure, weak human research subject protection and a lack of capable research resources. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the established strengths, Shenzhen still needs to develop suitable technical platforms, human resources training programmes and strong human research subject protection programmes pertaining to clinical research. This would facilitate the establishment of a functional system that can be expected to lead to increased medical research innovation in Shenzhen.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6500183
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65001832019-05-21 How to strengthen clinical research in Shenzhen, China: qualitative study Ji, Ping Chu, Hongling Zhang, Chao Xiao, Ping Liu, Min Zhou, Liping Wang, Haibo Wang, Yanfang Wu, Yangfeng BMJ Open Qualitative Research OBJECTIVES: To better understand the strengths and weaknesses, and to propose policy recommendations, regarding conducting high-quality clinical research in Shenzhen, China. DESIGN: A qualitative study conducted from August to November 2016 using a semistructured interview format involving both focus group interviews and individual interviews. SETTING: Shenzhen, China. PARTICIPANTS: Stratified purposive and convenience sampling were used. Thirty individuals experienced in conducting and managing clinical research were selected from key stakeholder groups, comprising 11 from local hospitals, 14 from pharmaceutical/medical device companies and 5 from government agencies. METHODS: A semistructured interview guide was developed by the study group and used by experienced interviewers in focus group discussions and individual interviews. The interviewees were encouraged to share their opinions freely and discuss their own topics of interest during the interviews. Thematic analysis was used for analysis and all data were coded and extracted using NVivo V.11.0 software. RESULTS: Favourable driving factors for clinical research in Shenzhen identified by all stakeholders included the recent trend of increased governmental funding for clinical research, supportive governmental policies, wide recognition of the value of clinical research and high demands from local industry. The major challenges include a lack of technical infrastructure, weak human research subject protection and a lack of capable research resources. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the established strengths, Shenzhen still needs to develop suitable technical platforms, human resources training programmes and strong human research subject protection programmes pertaining to clinical research. This would facilitate the establishment of a functional system that can be expected to lead to increased medical research innovation in Shenzhen. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6500183/ /pubmed/30948572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024534 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Qualitative Research
Ji, Ping
Chu, Hongling
Zhang, Chao
Xiao, Ping
Liu, Min
Zhou, Liping
Wang, Haibo
Wang, Yanfang
Wu, Yangfeng
How to strengthen clinical research in Shenzhen, China: qualitative study
title How to strengthen clinical research in Shenzhen, China: qualitative study
title_full How to strengthen clinical research in Shenzhen, China: qualitative study
title_fullStr How to strengthen clinical research in Shenzhen, China: qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed How to strengthen clinical research in Shenzhen, China: qualitative study
title_short How to strengthen clinical research in Shenzhen, China: qualitative study
title_sort how to strengthen clinical research in shenzhen, china: qualitative study
topic Qualitative Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30948572
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024534
work_keys_str_mv AT jiping howtostrengthenclinicalresearchinshenzhenchinaqualitativestudy
AT chuhongling howtostrengthenclinicalresearchinshenzhenchinaqualitativestudy
AT zhangchao howtostrengthenclinicalresearchinshenzhenchinaqualitativestudy
AT xiaoping howtostrengthenclinicalresearchinshenzhenchinaqualitativestudy
AT liumin howtostrengthenclinicalresearchinshenzhenchinaqualitativestudy
AT zhouliping howtostrengthenclinicalresearchinshenzhenchinaqualitativestudy
AT wanghaibo howtostrengthenclinicalresearchinshenzhenchinaqualitativestudy
AT wangyanfang howtostrengthenclinicalresearchinshenzhenchinaqualitativestudy
AT wuyangfeng howtostrengthenclinicalresearchinshenzhenchinaqualitativestudy