Cargando…
Slow release oral morphine versus methadone for the treatment of opioid use disorder
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of slow release oral morphine (SROM) as a treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD). DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). DATA SOURCES: Three electronic databases were searched through 1 May 2018: the Cochrane Central Reg...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500187/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30944135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025799 |
_version_ | 1783415897769115648 |
---|---|
author | Klimas, Jan Gorfinkel, Lauren Giacomuzzi, Salvatore M Ruckes, Christian Socías, M Eugenia Fairbairn, Nadia Wood, Evan |
author_facet | Klimas, Jan Gorfinkel, Lauren Giacomuzzi, Salvatore M Ruckes, Christian Socías, M Eugenia Fairbairn, Nadia Wood, Evan |
author_sort | Klimas, Jan |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of slow release oral morphine (SROM) as a treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD). DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). DATA SOURCES: Three electronic databases were searched through 1 May 2018: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE and EMBASE. We also searched the following electronic registers for ongoing trials: ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, Current Controlled Trials and the EU Clinical Trials Register. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: We included RCTs of all durations, assessing the effect of SROM on measures of treatment retention, heroin use and craving in adults who met the diagnostic criteria for OUD. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Data were pooled using the random-effects model and expressed as risk ratios (RRs) or mean differences with 95% CIs. Heterogeneity was assessed (χ(2) statistic) and quantified (I(2) statistic) and a sensitivity analysis was undertaken to assess the impact of particular high-risk trials. RESULTS: Among 1315 records screened and four studies reviewed, four unique randomised trials met the inclusion criteria (n=471), and compared SROM with methadone. In the meta-analysis, we observed no significant differences between SROM and methadone in improving treatment retention (RR=0.98; 95%CI: 0.94 to 1.02, p=0.34) and heroin use (RR=0.96; 95% CI: 0.61 to 1.52, p=0.86). Craving data was not amenable to meta-analysis. Available data implied no differences in adverse events, heroin, cocaine or benzodiazepine use. CONCLUSIONS: Meta-analysis of existing randomised trials suggests SROM may be generally equal to methadone in retaining patients in treatment and reducing heroin use while potentially resulting in less craving. The methodological quality of the included RCTs was low-to-moderate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6500187 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65001872019-05-21 Slow release oral morphine versus methadone for the treatment of opioid use disorder Klimas, Jan Gorfinkel, Lauren Giacomuzzi, Salvatore M Ruckes, Christian Socías, M Eugenia Fairbairn, Nadia Wood, Evan BMJ Open Addiction OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of slow release oral morphine (SROM) as a treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD). DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). DATA SOURCES: Three electronic databases were searched through 1 May 2018: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE and EMBASE. We also searched the following electronic registers for ongoing trials: ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, Current Controlled Trials and the EU Clinical Trials Register. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: We included RCTs of all durations, assessing the effect of SROM on measures of treatment retention, heroin use and craving in adults who met the diagnostic criteria for OUD. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Data were pooled using the random-effects model and expressed as risk ratios (RRs) or mean differences with 95% CIs. Heterogeneity was assessed (χ(2) statistic) and quantified (I(2) statistic) and a sensitivity analysis was undertaken to assess the impact of particular high-risk trials. RESULTS: Among 1315 records screened and four studies reviewed, four unique randomised trials met the inclusion criteria (n=471), and compared SROM with methadone. In the meta-analysis, we observed no significant differences between SROM and methadone in improving treatment retention (RR=0.98; 95%CI: 0.94 to 1.02, p=0.34) and heroin use (RR=0.96; 95% CI: 0.61 to 1.52, p=0.86). Craving data was not amenable to meta-analysis. Available data implied no differences in adverse events, heroin, cocaine or benzodiazepine use. CONCLUSIONS: Meta-analysis of existing randomised trials suggests SROM may be generally equal to methadone in retaining patients in treatment and reducing heroin use while potentially resulting in less craving. The methodological quality of the included RCTs was low-to-moderate. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6500187/ /pubmed/30944135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025799 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Addiction Klimas, Jan Gorfinkel, Lauren Giacomuzzi, Salvatore M Ruckes, Christian Socías, M Eugenia Fairbairn, Nadia Wood, Evan Slow release oral morphine versus methadone for the treatment of opioid use disorder |
title | Slow release oral morphine versus methadone for the treatment of opioid use disorder |
title_full | Slow release oral morphine versus methadone for the treatment of opioid use disorder |
title_fullStr | Slow release oral morphine versus methadone for the treatment of opioid use disorder |
title_full_unstemmed | Slow release oral morphine versus methadone for the treatment of opioid use disorder |
title_short | Slow release oral morphine versus methadone for the treatment of opioid use disorder |
title_sort | slow release oral morphine versus methadone for the treatment of opioid use disorder |
topic | Addiction |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500187/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30944135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025799 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT klimasjan slowreleaseoralmorphineversusmethadoneforthetreatmentofopioidusedisorder AT gorfinkellauren slowreleaseoralmorphineversusmethadoneforthetreatmentofopioidusedisorder AT giacomuzzisalvatorem slowreleaseoralmorphineversusmethadoneforthetreatmentofopioidusedisorder AT ruckeschristian slowreleaseoralmorphineversusmethadoneforthetreatmentofopioidusedisorder AT sociasmeugenia slowreleaseoralmorphineversusmethadoneforthetreatmentofopioidusedisorder AT fairbairnnadia slowreleaseoralmorphineversusmethadoneforthetreatmentofopioidusedisorder AT woodevan slowreleaseoralmorphineversusmethadoneforthetreatmentofopioidusedisorder |