Cargando…

Slow release oral morphine versus methadone for the treatment of opioid use disorder

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of slow release oral morphine (SROM) as a treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD). DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). DATA SOURCES: Three electronic databases were searched through 1 May 2018: the Cochrane Central Reg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klimas, Jan, Gorfinkel, Lauren, Giacomuzzi, Salvatore M, Ruckes, Christian, Socías, M Eugenia, Fairbairn, Nadia, Wood, Evan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30944135
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025799
_version_ 1783415897769115648
author Klimas, Jan
Gorfinkel, Lauren
Giacomuzzi, Salvatore M
Ruckes, Christian
Socías, M Eugenia
Fairbairn, Nadia
Wood, Evan
author_facet Klimas, Jan
Gorfinkel, Lauren
Giacomuzzi, Salvatore M
Ruckes, Christian
Socías, M Eugenia
Fairbairn, Nadia
Wood, Evan
author_sort Klimas, Jan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of slow release oral morphine (SROM) as a treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD). DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). DATA SOURCES: Three electronic databases were searched through 1 May 2018: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE and EMBASE. We also searched the following electronic registers for ongoing trials: ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, Current Controlled Trials and the EU Clinical Trials Register. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: We included RCTs of all durations, assessing the effect of SROM on measures of treatment retention, heroin use and craving in adults who met the diagnostic criteria for OUD. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Data were pooled using the random-effects model and expressed as risk ratios (RRs) or mean differences with 95% CIs. Heterogeneity was assessed (χ(2) statistic) and quantified (I(2) statistic) and a sensitivity analysis was undertaken to assess the impact of particular high-risk trials. RESULTS: Among 1315 records screened and four studies reviewed, four unique randomised trials met the inclusion criteria (n=471), and compared SROM with methadone. In the meta-analysis, we observed no significant differences between SROM and methadone in improving treatment retention (RR=0.98; 95%CI: 0.94 to 1.02, p=0.34) and heroin use (RR=0.96; 95% CI: 0.61 to 1.52, p=0.86). Craving data was not amenable to meta-analysis. Available data implied no differences in adverse events, heroin, cocaine or benzodiazepine use. CONCLUSIONS: Meta-analysis of existing randomised trials suggests SROM may be generally equal to methadone in retaining patients in treatment and reducing heroin use while potentially resulting in less craving. The methodological quality of the included RCTs was low-to-moderate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6500187
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65001872019-05-21 Slow release oral morphine versus methadone for the treatment of opioid use disorder Klimas, Jan Gorfinkel, Lauren Giacomuzzi, Salvatore M Ruckes, Christian Socías, M Eugenia Fairbairn, Nadia Wood, Evan BMJ Open Addiction OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of slow release oral morphine (SROM) as a treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD). DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). DATA SOURCES: Three electronic databases were searched through 1 May 2018: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE and EMBASE. We also searched the following electronic registers for ongoing trials: ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, Current Controlled Trials and the EU Clinical Trials Register. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: We included RCTs of all durations, assessing the effect of SROM on measures of treatment retention, heroin use and craving in adults who met the diagnostic criteria for OUD. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Data were pooled using the random-effects model and expressed as risk ratios (RRs) or mean differences with 95% CIs. Heterogeneity was assessed (χ(2) statistic) and quantified (I(2) statistic) and a sensitivity analysis was undertaken to assess the impact of particular high-risk trials. RESULTS: Among 1315 records screened and four studies reviewed, four unique randomised trials met the inclusion criteria (n=471), and compared SROM with methadone. In the meta-analysis, we observed no significant differences between SROM and methadone in improving treatment retention (RR=0.98; 95%CI: 0.94 to 1.02, p=0.34) and heroin use (RR=0.96; 95% CI: 0.61 to 1.52, p=0.86). Craving data was not amenable to meta-analysis. Available data implied no differences in adverse events, heroin, cocaine or benzodiazepine use. CONCLUSIONS: Meta-analysis of existing randomised trials suggests SROM may be generally equal to methadone in retaining patients in treatment and reducing heroin use while potentially resulting in less craving. The methodological quality of the included RCTs was low-to-moderate. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6500187/ /pubmed/30944135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025799 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Addiction
Klimas, Jan
Gorfinkel, Lauren
Giacomuzzi, Salvatore M
Ruckes, Christian
Socías, M Eugenia
Fairbairn, Nadia
Wood, Evan
Slow release oral morphine versus methadone for the treatment of opioid use disorder
title Slow release oral morphine versus methadone for the treatment of opioid use disorder
title_full Slow release oral morphine versus methadone for the treatment of opioid use disorder
title_fullStr Slow release oral morphine versus methadone for the treatment of opioid use disorder
title_full_unstemmed Slow release oral morphine versus methadone for the treatment of opioid use disorder
title_short Slow release oral morphine versus methadone for the treatment of opioid use disorder
title_sort slow release oral morphine versus methadone for the treatment of opioid use disorder
topic Addiction
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30944135
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025799
work_keys_str_mv AT klimasjan slowreleaseoralmorphineversusmethadoneforthetreatmentofopioidusedisorder
AT gorfinkellauren slowreleaseoralmorphineversusmethadoneforthetreatmentofopioidusedisorder
AT giacomuzzisalvatorem slowreleaseoralmorphineversusmethadoneforthetreatmentofopioidusedisorder
AT ruckeschristian slowreleaseoralmorphineversusmethadoneforthetreatmentofopioidusedisorder
AT sociasmeugenia slowreleaseoralmorphineversusmethadoneforthetreatmentofopioidusedisorder
AT fairbairnnadia slowreleaseoralmorphineversusmethadoneforthetreatmentofopioidusedisorder
AT woodevan slowreleaseoralmorphineversusmethadoneforthetreatmentofopioidusedisorder