Cargando…
Efficacy of pressure ulcer prevention interventions in adult intensive care units: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
INTRODUCTION: Pressure ulcers (PUs) are associated with substantial health burden. Patients in intensive care units (ICUs) are at high risk for developing PU. In the absence of large randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compare commonly known interventions for preventing PU in ICUs, uncertainty...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500189/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30967408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026727 |
_version_ | 1783415898266140672 |
---|---|
author | Du, Yixiu Wu, Fangqin Lu, Sai Zheng, Wei Wang, Huiying Chen, Ruming Lu, Xiaoying Zhang, Yu |
author_facet | Du, Yixiu Wu, Fangqin Lu, Sai Zheng, Wei Wang, Huiying Chen, Ruming Lu, Xiaoying Zhang, Yu |
author_sort | Du, Yixiu |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Pressure ulcers (PUs) are associated with substantial health burden. Patients in intensive care units (ICUs) are at high risk for developing PU. In the absence of large randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compare commonly known interventions for preventing PU in ICUs, uncertainty remains around the best practice strategy for PU management in adult ICUs. This study, therefore, aims to identify the most effective interventions and combinations of interventions that prevent PU in adult ICU using systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search for all published and unpublished RCTs evaluating interventions to prevent PU compared with other PU prevention measures or with usual care in adult ICU. The primary outcomes are the incidence of PUs and PU severity in critically ill patients in ICU. The secondary outcomes include number of PUs per patient and intervention-related harms caused by the prevention intervention or intervention-related harms. All data extraction will be performed by at least two independent reviewers on the basis of a priori developed extraction form. We will evaluate the risk of bias of the included RCTs in accordance with the Cochrane Collaboration’s risk of bias tool, and assess the quality of evidence using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. A standard pairwise meta-analysis and a Bayesian NMA will be conducted to compare the efficacy of different PU prevention interventions. A surface under the cumulative ranking curve will be used to rank the probabilities of each prevention intervention for various outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study will not require the ethics approval as it is a review based on published studies. The findings of this study will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication. We anticipate that the results of the study will provide the evidence to inform clinicians and guideline developers on determining the best interventions for the prevention of PU in ICU patients. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018085562. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6500189 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65001892019-05-21 Efficacy of pressure ulcer prevention interventions in adult intensive care units: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis Du, Yixiu Wu, Fangqin Lu, Sai Zheng, Wei Wang, Huiying Chen, Ruming Lu, Xiaoying Zhang, Yu BMJ Open Intensive Care INTRODUCTION: Pressure ulcers (PUs) are associated with substantial health burden. Patients in intensive care units (ICUs) are at high risk for developing PU. In the absence of large randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compare commonly known interventions for preventing PU in ICUs, uncertainty remains around the best practice strategy for PU management in adult ICUs. This study, therefore, aims to identify the most effective interventions and combinations of interventions that prevent PU in adult ICU using systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search for all published and unpublished RCTs evaluating interventions to prevent PU compared with other PU prevention measures or with usual care in adult ICU. The primary outcomes are the incidence of PUs and PU severity in critically ill patients in ICU. The secondary outcomes include number of PUs per patient and intervention-related harms caused by the prevention intervention or intervention-related harms. All data extraction will be performed by at least two independent reviewers on the basis of a priori developed extraction form. We will evaluate the risk of bias of the included RCTs in accordance with the Cochrane Collaboration’s risk of bias tool, and assess the quality of evidence using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. A standard pairwise meta-analysis and a Bayesian NMA will be conducted to compare the efficacy of different PU prevention interventions. A surface under the cumulative ranking curve will be used to rank the probabilities of each prevention intervention for various outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study will not require the ethics approval as it is a review based on published studies. The findings of this study will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication. We anticipate that the results of the study will provide the evidence to inform clinicians and guideline developers on determining the best interventions for the prevention of PU in ICU patients. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018085562. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6500189/ /pubmed/30967408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026727 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Intensive Care Du, Yixiu Wu, Fangqin Lu, Sai Zheng, Wei Wang, Huiying Chen, Ruming Lu, Xiaoying Zhang, Yu Efficacy of pressure ulcer prevention interventions in adult intensive care units: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title | Efficacy of pressure ulcer prevention interventions in adult intensive care units: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_full | Efficacy of pressure ulcer prevention interventions in adult intensive care units: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of pressure ulcer prevention interventions in adult intensive care units: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of pressure ulcer prevention interventions in adult intensive care units: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_short | Efficacy of pressure ulcer prevention interventions in adult intensive care units: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_sort | efficacy of pressure ulcer prevention interventions in adult intensive care units: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
topic | Intensive Care |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500189/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30967408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026727 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT duyixiu efficacyofpressureulcerpreventioninterventionsinadultintensivecareunitsaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT wufangqin efficacyofpressureulcerpreventioninterventionsinadultintensivecareunitsaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT lusai efficacyofpressureulcerpreventioninterventionsinadultintensivecareunitsaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT zhengwei efficacyofpressureulcerpreventioninterventionsinadultintensivecareunitsaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT wanghuiying efficacyofpressureulcerpreventioninterventionsinadultintensivecareunitsaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT chenruming efficacyofpressureulcerpreventioninterventionsinadultintensivecareunitsaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT luxiaoying efficacyofpressureulcerpreventioninterventionsinadultintensivecareunitsaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT zhangyu efficacyofpressureulcerpreventioninterventionsinadultintensivecareunitsaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis |