Cargando…

Efficacy of pressure ulcer prevention interventions in adult intensive care units: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: Pressure ulcers (PUs) are associated with substantial health burden. Patients in intensive care units (ICUs) are at high risk for developing PU. In the absence of large randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compare commonly known interventions for preventing PU in ICUs, uncertainty...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Du, Yixiu, Wu, Fangqin, Lu, Sai, Zheng, Wei, Wang, Huiying, Chen, Ruming, Lu, Xiaoying, Zhang, Yu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30967408
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026727
_version_ 1783415898266140672
author Du, Yixiu
Wu, Fangqin
Lu, Sai
Zheng, Wei
Wang, Huiying
Chen, Ruming
Lu, Xiaoying
Zhang, Yu
author_facet Du, Yixiu
Wu, Fangqin
Lu, Sai
Zheng, Wei
Wang, Huiying
Chen, Ruming
Lu, Xiaoying
Zhang, Yu
author_sort Du, Yixiu
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Pressure ulcers (PUs) are associated with substantial health burden. Patients in intensive care units (ICUs) are at high risk for developing PU. In the absence of large randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compare commonly known interventions for preventing PU in ICUs, uncertainty remains around the best practice strategy for PU management in adult ICUs. This study, therefore, aims to identify the most effective interventions and combinations of interventions that prevent PU in adult ICU using systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search for all published and unpublished RCTs evaluating interventions to prevent PU compared with other PU prevention measures or with usual care in adult ICU. The primary outcomes are the incidence of PUs and PU severity in critically ill patients in ICU. The secondary outcomes include number of PUs per patient and intervention-related harms caused by the prevention intervention or intervention-related harms. All data extraction will be performed by at least two independent reviewers on the basis of a priori developed extraction form. We will evaluate the risk of bias of the included RCTs in accordance with the Cochrane Collaboration’s risk of bias tool, and assess the quality of evidence using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. A standard pairwise meta-analysis and a Bayesian NMA will be conducted to compare the efficacy of different PU prevention interventions. A surface under the cumulative ranking curve will be used to rank the probabilities of each prevention intervention for various outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study will not require the ethics approval as it is a review based on published studies. The findings of this study will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication. We anticipate that the results of the study will provide the evidence to inform clinicians and guideline developers on determining the best interventions for the prevention of PU in ICU patients. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018085562.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6500189
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65001892019-05-21 Efficacy of pressure ulcer prevention interventions in adult intensive care units: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis Du, Yixiu Wu, Fangqin Lu, Sai Zheng, Wei Wang, Huiying Chen, Ruming Lu, Xiaoying Zhang, Yu BMJ Open Intensive Care INTRODUCTION: Pressure ulcers (PUs) are associated with substantial health burden. Patients in intensive care units (ICUs) are at high risk for developing PU. In the absence of large randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compare commonly known interventions for preventing PU in ICUs, uncertainty remains around the best practice strategy for PU management in adult ICUs. This study, therefore, aims to identify the most effective interventions and combinations of interventions that prevent PU in adult ICU using systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search for all published and unpublished RCTs evaluating interventions to prevent PU compared with other PU prevention measures or with usual care in adult ICU. The primary outcomes are the incidence of PUs and PU severity in critically ill patients in ICU. The secondary outcomes include number of PUs per patient and intervention-related harms caused by the prevention intervention or intervention-related harms. All data extraction will be performed by at least two independent reviewers on the basis of a priori developed extraction form. We will evaluate the risk of bias of the included RCTs in accordance with the Cochrane Collaboration’s risk of bias tool, and assess the quality of evidence using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. A standard pairwise meta-analysis and a Bayesian NMA will be conducted to compare the efficacy of different PU prevention interventions. A surface under the cumulative ranking curve will be used to rank the probabilities of each prevention intervention for various outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study will not require the ethics approval as it is a review based on published studies. The findings of this study will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication. We anticipate that the results of the study will provide the evidence to inform clinicians and guideline developers on determining the best interventions for the prevention of PU in ICU patients. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018085562. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6500189/ /pubmed/30967408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026727 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Intensive Care
Du, Yixiu
Wu, Fangqin
Lu, Sai
Zheng, Wei
Wang, Huiying
Chen, Ruming
Lu, Xiaoying
Zhang, Yu
Efficacy of pressure ulcer prevention interventions in adult intensive care units: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title Efficacy of pressure ulcer prevention interventions in adult intensive care units: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_full Efficacy of pressure ulcer prevention interventions in adult intensive care units: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy of pressure ulcer prevention interventions in adult intensive care units: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of pressure ulcer prevention interventions in adult intensive care units: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_short Efficacy of pressure ulcer prevention interventions in adult intensive care units: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy of pressure ulcer prevention interventions in adult intensive care units: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
topic Intensive Care
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30967408
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026727
work_keys_str_mv AT duyixiu efficacyofpressureulcerpreventioninterventionsinadultintensivecareunitsaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT wufangqin efficacyofpressureulcerpreventioninterventionsinadultintensivecareunitsaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT lusai efficacyofpressureulcerpreventioninterventionsinadultintensivecareunitsaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT zhengwei efficacyofpressureulcerpreventioninterventionsinadultintensivecareunitsaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT wanghuiying efficacyofpressureulcerpreventioninterventionsinadultintensivecareunitsaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT chenruming efficacyofpressureulcerpreventioninterventionsinadultintensivecareunitsaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT luxiaoying efficacyofpressureulcerpreventioninterventionsinadultintensivecareunitsaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT zhangyu efficacyofpressureulcerpreventioninterventionsinadultintensivecareunitsaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis