Cargando…

Young adult perceptions of JUUL and other pod electronic cigarette devices in California: a qualitative study

OBJECTIVE: Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) which utilise prefilled ‘pods’ (pod devices) entered the US market in 2015. One brand, JUUL, captured more than half the e-cigarette market in early 2018, and the US Food and Drug Administration recently warned its manufacturer about adolescent uptake....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Keamy-Minor, Emily, McQuoid, Julia, Ling, Pamela M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500190/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30948599
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026306
_version_ 1783415898531430400
author Keamy-Minor, Emily
McQuoid, Julia
Ling, Pamela M
author_facet Keamy-Minor, Emily
McQuoid, Julia
Ling, Pamela M
author_sort Keamy-Minor, Emily
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) which utilise prefilled ‘pods’ (pod devices) entered the US market in 2015. One brand, JUUL, captured more than half the e-cigarette market in early 2018, and the US Food and Drug Administration recently warned its manufacturer about adolescent uptake. This is the first qualitative study to describe distinct features of pod devices that appear to contribute to their popularity among young people. DESIGN: Qualitative interview study of young adults who had used pod devices. Participants were recruited from Facebook, other social media, street recruitment and via snowball sampling. SETTING: Participants were from California, with most from the San Francisco Bay Area. PARTICIPANTS: Young adults (aged 18–29 years) using multiple tobacco products (cigarettes, e-cigarettes and/or smokeless tobacco) were recruited. Of the sample of 60 participants, 24 were included in this analysis: 10 who reported experience with pod devices and 14 who used other non-pod e-cigarette devices. RESULTS: Ten participants had used a pod device in the past year. Of the pod device users, seven still used a pod device at the time of the interview and five did so daily. Nearly all (n=9) pod device users smoked cigarettes in the past month; none were daily smokers. The 14 participants who used non-pod devices provided a point of comparison. Participants highlighted some distinct aspects of pod devices that facilitated use, including their aesthetic similarity to personal electronics, high levels of nicotine delivery with distinct psychoactive effects, more discreet and shorter duration use sessions, and greater social acceptability than more ostentatious non-pod e-cigarettes. CONCLUSIONS: Pod devices’ unique characteristics likely encourage pod device uptake among young people. Limitations on advertising in youth channels, flavours and distribution, and education about nicotine addiction may decrease initiation among young people and non-smokers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6500190
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65001902019-05-21 Young adult perceptions of JUUL and other pod electronic cigarette devices in California: a qualitative study Keamy-Minor, Emily McQuoid, Julia Ling, Pamela M BMJ Open Smoking and Tobacco OBJECTIVE: Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) which utilise prefilled ‘pods’ (pod devices) entered the US market in 2015. One brand, JUUL, captured more than half the e-cigarette market in early 2018, and the US Food and Drug Administration recently warned its manufacturer about adolescent uptake. This is the first qualitative study to describe distinct features of pod devices that appear to contribute to their popularity among young people. DESIGN: Qualitative interview study of young adults who had used pod devices. Participants were recruited from Facebook, other social media, street recruitment and via snowball sampling. SETTING: Participants were from California, with most from the San Francisco Bay Area. PARTICIPANTS: Young adults (aged 18–29 years) using multiple tobacco products (cigarettes, e-cigarettes and/or smokeless tobacco) were recruited. Of the sample of 60 participants, 24 were included in this analysis: 10 who reported experience with pod devices and 14 who used other non-pod e-cigarette devices. RESULTS: Ten participants had used a pod device in the past year. Of the pod device users, seven still used a pod device at the time of the interview and five did so daily. Nearly all (n=9) pod device users smoked cigarettes in the past month; none were daily smokers. The 14 participants who used non-pod devices provided a point of comparison. Participants highlighted some distinct aspects of pod devices that facilitated use, including their aesthetic similarity to personal electronics, high levels of nicotine delivery with distinct psychoactive effects, more discreet and shorter duration use sessions, and greater social acceptability than more ostentatious non-pod e-cigarettes. CONCLUSIONS: Pod devices’ unique characteristics likely encourage pod device uptake among young people. Limitations on advertising in youth channels, flavours and distribution, and education about nicotine addiction may decrease initiation among young people and non-smokers. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6500190/ /pubmed/30948599 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026306 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Smoking and Tobacco
Keamy-Minor, Emily
McQuoid, Julia
Ling, Pamela M
Young adult perceptions of JUUL and other pod electronic cigarette devices in California: a qualitative study
title Young adult perceptions of JUUL and other pod electronic cigarette devices in California: a qualitative study
title_full Young adult perceptions of JUUL and other pod electronic cigarette devices in California: a qualitative study
title_fullStr Young adult perceptions of JUUL and other pod electronic cigarette devices in California: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Young adult perceptions of JUUL and other pod electronic cigarette devices in California: a qualitative study
title_short Young adult perceptions of JUUL and other pod electronic cigarette devices in California: a qualitative study
title_sort young adult perceptions of juul and other pod electronic cigarette devices in california: a qualitative study
topic Smoking and Tobacco
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500190/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30948599
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026306
work_keys_str_mv AT keamyminoremily youngadultperceptionsofjuulandotherpodelectroniccigarettedevicesincaliforniaaqualitativestudy
AT mcquoidjulia youngadultperceptionsofjuulandotherpodelectroniccigarettedevicesincaliforniaaqualitativestudy
AT lingpamelam youngadultperceptionsofjuulandotherpodelectroniccigarettedevicesincaliforniaaqualitativestudy