Cargando…

What are junior doctors for? The work of Foundation doctors in the UK: a mixed methods study

OBJECTIVES: To examine what activities constitute the work of Foundation doctors and understand the factors that determine how that work is constructed. DESIGN: Cross-sectional mixed methods study. Questionnaire survey of the frequency with which activities specified in curricular documents are perf...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vance, Gillian, Jandial, Sharmila, Scott, Jon, Burford, Bryan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30962239
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027522
_version_ 1783415898762117120
author Vance, Gillian
Jandial, Sharmila
Scott, Jon
Burford, Bryan
author_facet Vance, Gillian
Jandial, Sharmila
Scott, Jon
Burford, Bryan
author_sort Vance, Gillian
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To examine what activities constitute the work of Foundation doctors and understand the factors that determine how that work is constructed. DESIGN: Cross-sectional mixed methods study. Questionnaire survey of the frequency with which activities specified in curricular documents are performed. Semistructured interviews and focus groups. SETTING: Postgraduate medical training in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: Doctors in their first 2 years of postgraduate practice (Foundation Programme). Staff who work with Foundation doctors—supervisors, nurses and employers (clinical; non-clinical). RESULTS: Survey data from 3697 Foundation doctors identified curricular activities (41/103, 42%) that are carried out routinely (performed at least once or twice per week by >75% of respondents). However, another 30 activities (29%) were carried out rarely (at least once or twice per week by <25% respondents), largely because they are routinely part of nurses’, and not doctors’, work. Junior doctors indicated their work constituted three roles: ‘support’ of ward and team, ‘independent practitioner’ and ‘learner’. The support function dominated work, but conflicted with stereotyped expectations of what ‘being a doctor’ would be. It was, however, valued by the other staff groups. The learner role was felt to be incidental to practice, but was couched in a limited definition of learning that related to new skills, rather than consolidation and practice. Activities and perceived role were shaped by the organisational context, medical hierarchies and through relationships with nurses, which could change unpredictably and cause tension. Training progression did not affect what activities were done, but supported greater autonomy in how they were carried out. CONCLUSIONS: New doctors must be fit for multiple roles. Strategies for transition should manage graduates’ expectations of real-world work, and encourage teams and organisations to better accommodate graduates. These strategies may help ensure that new doctors can adapt to the variable demands of the evolving multiprofessional workforce.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6500191
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65001912019-05-21 What are junior doctors for? The work of Foundation doctors in the UK: a mixed methods study Vance, Gillian Jandial, Sharmila Scott, Jon Burford, Bryan BMJ Open Medical Education and Training OBJECTIVES: To examine what activities constitute the work of Foundation doctors and understand the factors that determine how that work is constructed. DESIGN: Cross-sectional mixed methods study. Questionnaire survey of the frequency with which activities specified in curricular documents are performed. Semistructured interviews and focus groups. SETTING: Postgraduate medical training in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: Doctors in their first 2 years of postgraduate practice (Foundation Programme). Staff who work with Foundation doctors—supervisors, nurses and employers (clinical; non-clinical). RESULTS: Survey data from 3697 Foundation doctors identified curricular activities (41/103, 42%) that are carried out routinely (performed at least once or twice per week by >75% of respondents). However, another 30 activities (29%) were carried out rarely (at least once or twice per week by <25% respondents), largely because they are routinely part of nurses’, and not doctors’, work. Junior doctors indicated their work constituted three roles: ‘support’ of ward and team, ‘independent practitioner’ and ‘learner’. The support function dominated work, but conflicted with stereotyped expectations of what ‘being a doctor’ would be. It was, however, valued by the other staff groups. The learner role was felt to be incidental to practice, but was couched in a limited definition of learning that related to new skills, rather than consolidation and practice. Activities and perceived role were shaped by the organisational context, medical hierarchies and through relationships with nurses, which could change unpredictably and cause tension. Training progression did not affect what activities were done, but supported greater autonomy in how they were carried out. CONCLUSIONS: New doctors must be fit for multiple roles. Strategies for transition should manage graduates’ expectations of real-world work, and encourage teams and organisations to better accommodate graduates. These strategies may help ensure that new doctors can adapt to the variable demands of the evolving multiprofessional workforce. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6500191/ /pubmed/30962239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027522 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Medical Education and Training
Vance, Gillian
Jandial, Sharmila
Scott, Jon
Burford, Bryan
What are junior doctors for? The work of Foundation doctors in the UK: a mixed methods study
title What are junior doctors for? The work of Foundation doctors in the UK: a mixed methods study
title_full What are junior doctors for? The work of Foundation doctors in the UK: a mixed methods study
title_fullStr What are junior doctors for? The work of Foundation doctors in the UK: a mixed methods study
title_full_unstemmed What are junior doctors for? The work of Foundation doctors in the UK: a mixed methods study
title_short What are junior doctors for? The work of Foundation doctors in the UK: a mixed methods study
title_sort what are junior doctors for? the work of foundation doctors in the uk: a mixed methods study
topic Medical Education and Training
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30962239
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027522
work_keys_str_mv AT vancegillian whatarejuniordoctorsfortheworkoffoundationdoctorsintheukamixedmethodsstudy
AT jandialsharmila whatarejuniordoctorsfortheworkoffoundationdoctorsintheukamixedmethodsstudy
AT scottjon whatarejuniordoctorsfortheworkoffoundationdoctorsintheukamixedmethodsstudy
AT burfordbryan whatarejuniordoctorsfortheworkoffoundationdoctorsintheukamixedmethodsstudy