Cargando…

Systematic review of systematic reviews for effectiveness of internal fixation for flail chest and rib fractures in adults

OBJECTIVES: Multiple systematic reviews have reported on the impact of rib fracture fixation in the presence of flail chest and multiple rib fractures, however this practice remains controversial. Our aim is to synthesise the effectiveness of surgical rib fracture fixation as evidenced by systematic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ingoe, Helen MA, Coleman, Elizabeth, Eardley, William, Rangan, Amar, Hewitt, Catherine, McDaid, Catriona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500198/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30940753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023444
_version_ 1783415900423061504
author Ingoe, Helen MA
Coleman, Elizabeth
Eardley, William
Rangan, Amar
Hewitt, Catherine
McDaid, Catriona
author_facet Ingoe, Helen MA
Coleman, Elizabeth
Eardley, William
Rangan, Amar
Hewitt, Catherine
McDaid, Catriona
author_sort Ingoe, Helen MA
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Multiple systematic reviews have reported on the impact of rib fracture fixation in the presence of flail chest and multiple rib fractures, however this practice remains controversial. Our aim is to synthesise the effectiveness of surgical rib fracture fixation as evidenced by systematic reviews. DESIGN: A systematic search identified systematic reviews comparing effectiveness of rib fracture fixation with non-operative management of adults with flail chest or unifocal non-flail rib fractures. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Science Citation Index were last searched 17 March 2017. Risk of bias was assessed using the Risk Of Bias In Systematic reviews (ROBIS) tool. The primary outcome was duration of mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: Twelve systematic reviews were included, consisting of 3 unique randomised controlled trials and 19 non-randomised studies. Length of mechanical ventilation was shorter in the fixation group compared with the non–operative group in flail chest; pooled estimates ranged from −4.52 days, 95% CI (−5.54 to –3.5) to −7.5 days, 95% CI (−9.9 to –5.5). Pneumonia, length of hospital and intensive care unit stay all showed a statistically significant improvement in favour of fixation for flail chest; however, all outcomes in favour of fixation had substantial heterogeneity. There was no statistically significant difference between groups in mortality. Two systematic reviews included one non-randomised studies of unifocal non-flail rib fracture population; due to limited evidence the benefits with surgery are uncertain. CONCLUSIONS: Synthesis of the reviews has shown some potential improvement in patient outcomes with flail chest after fixation. For future review updates, meta-analysis for effectiveness may need to take into account indications and timing of surgery as a subgroup analysis to address clinical heterogeneity between primary studies. Further robust evidence is required before conclusions can be drawn of the effectiveness of surgical fixation for flail chest and in particular, unifocal non-flail rib fractures. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42016053494.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6500198
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65001982019-05-21 Systematic review of systematic reviews for effectiveness of internal fixation for flail chest and rib fractures in adults Ingoe, Helen MA Coleman, Elizabeth Eardley, William Rangan, Amar Hewitt, Catherine McDaid, Catriona BMJ Open Surgery OBJECTIVES: Multiple systematic reviews have reported on the impact of rib fracture fixation in the presence of flail chest and multiple rib fractures, however this practice remains controversial. Our aim is to synthesise the effectiveness of surgical rib fracture fixation as evidenced by systematic reviews. DESIGN: A systematic search identified systematic reviews comparing effectiveness of rib fracture fixation with non-operative management of adults with flail chest or unifocal non-flail rib fractures. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Science Citation Index were last searched 17 March 2017. Risk of bias was assessed using the Risk Of Bias In Systematic reviews (ROBIS) tool. The primary outcome was duration of mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: Twelve systematic reviews were included, consisting of 3 unique randomised controlled trials and 19 non-randomised studies. Length of mechanical ventilation was shorter in the fixation group compared with the non–operative group in flail chest; pooled estimates ranged from −4.52 days, 95% CI (−5.54 to –3.5) to −7.5 days, 95% CI (−9.9 to –5.5). Pneumonia, length of hospital and intensive care unit stay all showed a statistically significant improvement in favour of fixation for flail chest; however, all outcomes in favour of fixation had substantial heterogeneity. There was no statistically significant difference between groups in mortality. Two systematic reviews included one non-randomised studies of unifocal non-flail rib fracture population; due to limited evidence the benefits with surgery are uncertain. CONCLUSIONS: Synthesis of the reviews has shown some potential improvement in patient outcomes with flail chest after fixation. For future review updates, meta-analysis for effectiveness may need to take into account indications and timing of surgery as a subgroup analysis to address clinical heterogeneity between primary studies. Further robust evidence is required before conclusions can be drawn of the effectiveness of surgical fixation for flail chest and in particular, unifocal non-flail rib fractures. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42016053494. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6500198/ /pubmed/30940753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023444 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Surgery
Ingoe, Helen MA
Coleman, Elizabeth
Eardley, William
Rangan, Amar
Hewitt, Catherine
McDaid, Catriona
Systematic review of systematic reviews for effectiveness of internal fixation for flail chest and rib fractures in adults
title Systematic review of systematic reviews for effectiveness of internal fixation for flail chest and rib fractures in adults
title_full Systematic review of systematic reviews for effectiveness of internal fixation for flail chest and rib fractures in adults
title_fullStr Systematic review of systematic reviews for effectiveness of internal fixation for flail chest and rib fractures in adults
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review of systematic reviews for effectiveness of internal fixation for flail chest and rib fractures in adults
title_short Systematic review of systematic reviews for effectiveness of internal fixation for flail chest and rib fractures in adults
title_sort systematic review of systematic reviews for effectiveness of internal fixation for flail chest and rib fractures in adults
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500198/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30940753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023444
work_keys_str_mv AT ingoehelenma systematicreviewofsystematicreviewsforeffectivenessofinternalfixationforflailchestandribfracturesinadults
AT colemanelizabeth systematicreviewofsystematicreviewsforeffectivenessofinternalfixationforflailchestandribfracturesinadults
AT eardleywilliam systematicreviewofsystematicreviewsforeffectivenessofinternalfixationforflailchestandribfracturesinadults
AT ranganamar systematicreviewofsystematicreviewsforeffectivenessofinternalfixationforflailchestandribfracturesinadults
AT hewittcatherine systematicreviewofsystematicreviewsforeffectivenessofinternalfixationforflailchestandribfracturesinadults
AT mcdaidcatriona systematicreviewofsystematicreviewsforeffectivenessofinternalfixationforflailchestandribfracturesinadults