Cargando…
How to decide adequately? Qualitative study of GPs’ view on decision-making in self-referred and physician-referred emergency department consultations in Berlin, Germany
OBJECTIVES: Patients with acute symptoms present not only to general practitioners (GPs), but also frequently to emergency departments (EDs). Patients’ decision processes leading up to an ED self-referral are complex and supposed to result from a multitude of determinants. While they are key provide...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500203/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30944138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026786 |
_version_ | 1783415901602709504 |
---|---|
author | Oslislo, Sarah Heintze, Christoph Schmiedhofer, Martina Möckel, Martin Schenk, Liane Holzinger, Felix |
author_facet | Oslislo, Sarah Heintze, Christoph Schmiedhofer, Martina Möckel, Martin Schenk, Liane Holzinger, Felix |
author_sort | Oslislo, Sarah |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Patients with acute symptoms present not only to general practitioners (GPs), but also frequently to emergency departments (EDs). Patients’ decision processes leading up to an ED self-referral are complex and supposed to result from a multitude of determinants. While they are key providers in primary care, little is known about GPs’ perception of such patients. This qualitative study explores the GPs’ view regarding motives and competences of patients self-referring to EDs, and also GPs’ rationale for or against physician-initiated ED referrals. DESIGN: Qualitative study with semi-structured, face-to-face interviews; qualitative content analysis. SETTING: GP practices in Berlin, Germany. PARTICIPANTS: 15 GPs (female/male: 9/6; mean age 53.6 years). RESULTS: The interviewed GPs related a wide spectrum of factors potentially influencing their patients’ decision to visit an ED, and also their own decision-making in potential referrals. Considerations go beyond medical urgency. Statements concerning patients’ surmised rationale corresponded to GPs’ reasoning in a variety of important areas. For one thing, the timely availability of an extended spectrum of diagnostic and therapeutic options may make ED services attractive to both. Access difficulties in the ambulatory setting were mentioned as additional triggers for an ED visit initiated by a patient or a GP. Key patient factors like severity of symptoms and anxiety also play a major role; a desire for reassurance may lead to both self-referred and physician-initiated ED visits. Patients’ health competence was prevailingly depicted as limited, with the internet as an important influencing factor. Counselling efforts by GP were described as crucial for improving health literacy. CONCLUSIONS: Health education could hold promise when aiming to reduce non-urgent ED consultations. Primary care providers are in a key position here. Amelioration of organisational shortages in ambulatory care, for example, limited consultation hours, might also make an important impact, as these trigger both self-referrals and GP-initiated ED referrals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00011930. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6500203 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65002032019-05-21 How to decide adequately? Qualitative study of GPs’ view on decision-making in self-referred and physician-referred emergency department consultations in Berlin, Germany Oslislo, Sarah Heintze, Christoph Schmiedhofer, Martina Möckel, Martin Schenk, Liane Holzinger, Felix BMJ Open Qualitative Research OBJECTIVES: Patients with acute symptoms present not only to general practitioners (GPs), but also frequently to emergency departments (EDs). Patients’ decision processes leading up to an ED self-referral are complex and supposed to result from a multitude of determinants. While they are key providers in primary care, little is known about GPs’ perception of such patients. This qualitative study explores the GPs’ view regarding motives and competences of patients self-referring to EDs, and also GPs’ rationale for or against physician-initiated ED referrals. DESIGN: Qualitative study with semi-structured, face-to-face interviews; qualitative content analysis. SETTING: GP practices in Berlin, Germany. PARTICIPANTS: 15 GPs (female/male: 9/6; mean age 53.6 years). RESULTS: The interviewed GPs related a wide spectrum of factors potentially influencing their patients’ decision to visit an ED, and also their own decision-making in potential referrals. Considerations go beyond medical urgency. Statements concerning patients’ surmised rationale corresponded to GPs’ reasoning in a variety of important areas. For one thing, the timely availability of an extended spectrum of diagnostic and therapeutic options may make ED services attractive to both. Access difficulties in the ambulatory setting were mentioned as additional triggers for an ED visit initiated by a patient or a GP. Key patient factors like severity of symptoms and anxiety also play a major role; a desire for reassurance may lead to both self-referred and physician-initiated ED visits. Patients’ health competence was prevailingly depicted as limited, with the internet as an important influencing factor. Counselling efforts by GP were described as crucial for improving health literacy. CONCLUSIONS: Health education could hold promise when aiming to reduce non-urgent ED consultations. Primary care providers are in a key position here. Amelioration of organisational shortages in ambulatory care, for example, limited consultation hours, might also make an important impact, as these trigger both self-referrals and GP-initiated ED referrals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00011930. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6500203/ /pubmed/30944138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026786 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Qualitative Research Oslislo, Sarah Heintze, Christoph Schmiedhofer, Martina Möckel, Martin Schenk, Liane Holzinger, Felix How to decide adequately? Qualitative study of GPs’ view on decision-making in self-referred and physician-referred emergency department consultations in Berlin, Germany |
title | How to decide adequately? Qualitative study of GPs’ view on decision-making in self-referred and physician-referred emergency department consultations in Berlin, Germany |
title_full | How to decide adequately? Qualitative study of GPs’ view on decision-making in self-referred and physician-referred emergency department consultations in Berlin, Germany |
title_fullStr | How to decide adequately? Qualitative study of GPs’ view on decision-making in self-referred and physician-referred emergency department consultations in Berlin, Germany |
title_full_unstemmed | How to decide adequately? Qualitative study of GPs’ view on decision-making in self-referred and physician-referred emergency department consultations in Berlin, Germany |
title_short | How to decide adequately? Qualitative study of GPs’ view on decision-making in self-referred and physician-referred emergency department consultations in Berlin, Germany |
title_sort | how to decide adequately? qualitative study of gps’ view on decision-making in self-referred and physician-referred emergency department consultations in berlin, germany |
topic | Qualitative Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500203/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30944138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026786 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oslislosarah howtodecideadequatelyqualitativestudyofgpsviewondecisionmakinginselfreferredandphysicianreferredemergencydepartmentconsultationsinberlingermany AT heintzechristoph howtodecideadequatelyqualitativestudyofgpsviewondecisionmakinginselfreferredandphysicianreferredemergencydepartmentconsultationsinberlingermany AT schmiedhofermartina howtodecideadequatelyqualitativestudyofgpsviewondecisionmakinginselfreferredandphysicianreferredemergencydepartmentconsultationsinberlingermany AT mockelmartin howtodecideadequatelyqualitativestudyofgpsviewondecisionmakinginselfreferredandphysicianreferredemergencydepartmentconsultationsinberlingermany AT schenkliane howtodecideadequatelyqualitativestudyofgpsviewondecisionmakinginselfreferredandphysicianreferredemergencydepartmentconsultationsinberlingermany AT holzingerfelix howtodecideadequatelyqualitativestudyofgpsviewondecisionmakinginselfreferredandphysicianreferredemergencydepartmentconsultationsinberlingermany |