Cargando…

How to decide adequately? Qualitative study of GPs’ view on decision-making in self-referred and physician-referred emergency department consultations in Berlin, Germany

OBJECTIVES: Patients with acute symptoms present not only to general practitioners (GPs), but also frequently to emergency departments (EDs). Patients’ decision processes leading up to an ED self-referral are complex and supposed to result from a multitude of determinants. While they are key provide...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oslislo, Sarah, Heintze, Christoph, Schmiedhofer, Martina, Möckel, Martin, Schenk, Liane, Holzinger, Felix
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30944138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026786
_version_ 1783415901602709504
author Oslislo, Sarah
Heintze, Christoph
Schmiedhofer, Martina
Möckel, Martin
Schenk, Liane
Holzinger, Felix
author_facet Oslislo, Sarah
Heintze, Christoph
Schmiedhofer, Martina
Möckel, Martin
Schenk, Liane
Holzinger, Felix
author_sort Oslislo, Sarah
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Patients with acute symptoms present not only to general practitioners (GPs), but also frequently to emergency departments (EDs). Patients’ decision processes leading up to an ED self-referral are complex and supposed to result from a multitude of determinants. While they are key providers in primary care, little is known about GPs’ perception of such patients. This qualitative study explores the GPs’ view regarding motives and competences of patients self-referring to EDs, and also GPs’ rationale for or against physician-initiated ED referrals. DESIGN: Qualitative study with semi-structured, face-to-face interviews; qualitative content analysis. SETTING: GP practices in Berlin, Germany. PARTICIPANTS: 15 GPs (female/male: 9/6; mean age 53.6 years). RESULTS: The interviewed GPs related a wide spectrum of factors potentially influencing their patients’ decision to visit an ED, and also their own decision-making in potential referrals. Considerations go beyond medical urgency. Statements concerning patients’ surmised rationale corresponded to GPs’ reasoning in a variety of important areas. For one thing, the timely availability of an extended spectrum of diagnostic and therapeutic options may make ED services attractive to both. Access difficulties in the ambulatory setting were mentioned as additional triggers for an ED visit initiated by a patient or a GP. Key patient factors like severity of symptoms and anxiety also play a major role; a desire for reassurance may lead to both self-referred and physician-initiated ED visits. Patients’ health competence was prevailingly depicted as limited, with the internet as an important influencing factor. Counselling efforts by GP were described as crucial for improving health literacy. CONCLUSIONS: Health education could hold promise when aiming to reduce non-urgent ED consultations. Primary care providers are in a key position here. Amelioration of organisational shortages in ambulatory care, for example, limited consultation hours, might also make an important impact, as these trigger both self-referrals and GP-initiated ED referrals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00011930.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6500203
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65002032019-05-21 How to decide adequately? Qualitative study of GPs’ view on decision-making in self-referred and physician-referred emergency department consultations in Berlin, Germany Oslislo, Sarah Heintze, Christoph Schmiedhofer, Martina Möckel, Martin Schenk, Liane Holzinger, Felix BMJ Open Qualitative Research OBJECTIVES: Patients with acute symptoms present not only to general practitioners (GPs), but also frequently to emergency departments (EDs). Patients’ decision processes leading up to an ED self-referral are complex and supposed to result from a multitude of determinants. While they are key providers in primary care, little is known about GPs’ perception of such patients. This qualitative study explores the GPs’ view regarding motives and competences of patients self-referring to EDs, and also GPs’ rationale for or against physician-initiated ED referrals. DESIGN: Qualitative study with semi-structured, face-to-face interviews; qualitative content analysis. SETTING: GP practices in Berlin, Germany. PARTICIPANTS: 15 GPs (female/male: 9/6; mean age 53.6 years). RESULTS: The interviewed GPs related a wide spectrum of factors potentially influencing their patients’ decision to visit an ED, and also their own decision-making in potential referrals. Considerations go beyond medical urgency. Statements concerning patients’ surmised rationale corresponded to GPs’ reasoning in a variety of important areas. For one thing, the timely availability of an extended spectrum of diagnostic and therapeutic options may make ED services attractive to both. Access difficulties in the ambulatory setting were mentioned as additional triggers for an ED visit initiated by a patient or a GP. Key patient factors like severity of symptoms and anxiety also play a major role; a desire for reassurance may lead to both self-referred and physician-initiated ED visits. Patients’ health competence was prevailingly depicted as limited, with the internet as an important influencing factor. Counselling efforts by GP were described as crucial for improving health literacy. CONCLUSIONS: Health education could hold promise when aiming to reduce non-urgent ED consultations. Primary care providers are in a key position here. Amelioration of organisational shortages in ambulatory care, for example, limited consultation hours, might also make an important impact, as these trigger both self-referrals and GP-initiated ED referrals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00011930. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6500203/ /pubmed/30944138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026786 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Qualitative Research
Oslislo, Sarah
Heintze, Christoph
Schmiedhofer, Martina
Möckel, Martin
Schenk, Liane
Holzinger, Felix
How to decide adequately? Qualitative study of GPs’ view on decision-making in self-referred and physician-referred emergency department consultations in Berlin, Germany
title How to decide adequately? Qualitative study of GPs’ view on decision-making in self-referred and physician-referred emergency department consultations in Berlin, Germany
title_full How to decide adequately? Qualitative study of GPs’ view on decision-making in self-referred and physician-referred emergency department consultations in Berlin, Germany
title_fullStr How to decide adequately? Qualitative study of GPs’ view on decision-making in self-referred and physician-referred emergency department consultations in Berlin, Germany
title_full_unstemmed How to decide adequately? Qualitative study of GPs’ view on decision-making in self-referred and physician-referred emergency department consultations in Berlin, Germany
title_short How to decide adequately? Qualitative study of GPs’ view on decision-making in self-referred and physician-referred emergency department consultations in Berlin, Germany
title_sort how to decide adequately? qualitative study of gps’ view on decision-making in self-referred and physician-referred emergency department consultations in berlin, germany
topic Qualitative Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30944138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026786
work_keys_str_mv AT oslislosarah howtodecideadequatelyqualitativestudyofgpsviewondecisionmakinginselfreferredandphysicianreferredemergencydepartmentconsultationsinberlingermany
AT heintzechristoph howtodecideadequatelyqualitativestudyofgpsviewondecisionmakinginselfreferredandphysicianreferredemergencydepartmentconsultationsinberlingermany
AT schmiedhofermartina howtodecideadequatelyqualitativestudyofgpsviewondecisionmakinginselfreferredandphysicianreferredemergencydepartmentconsultationsinberlingermany
AT mockelmartin howtodecideadequatelyqualitativestudyofgpsviewondecisionmakinginselfreferredandphysicianreferredemergencydepartmentconsultationsinberlingermany
AT schenkliane howtodecideadequatelyqualitativestudyofgpsviewondecisionmakinginselfreferredandphysicianreferredemergencydepartmentconsultationsinberlingermany
AT holzingerfelix howtodecideadequatelyqualitativestudyofgpsviewondecisionmakinginselfreferredandphysicianreferredemergencydepartmentconsultationsinberlingermany