Cargando…
Prevalence and practice for rare diseases in primary care: a national cross-sectional study in the USA
OBJECTIVES: There are more than 7000 rare diseases in the USA, and they are prevalent in 8% of the population. Due to life-threatening risk and limited therapies, early detection and treatment are critical. The purpose of this study was to explore characteristics of visits for patients with rare dis...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500220/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30940763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027248 |
_version_ | 1783415905647067136 |
---|---|
author | Jo, Ara Larson, Samantha Carek, Peter Peabody, Michael R Peterson, Lars E Mainous, Arch G |
author_facet | Jo, Ara Larson, Samantha Carek, Peter Peabody, Michael R Peterson, Lars E Mainous, Arch G |
author_sort | Jo, Ara |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: There are more than 7000 rare diseases in the USA, and they are prevalent in 8% of the population. Due to life-threatening risk and limited therapies, early detection and treatment are critical. The purpose of this study was to explore characteristics of visits for patients with rare diseases seen by primary care physicians (PCPs). DESIGN: The study used a cross sectional study using a national representative dataset, the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey for the years 2012–2014. SETTING: Primary care setting. PARTICIPANTS: Visits to PCPs (n=22 306 representing 354 507 772 office visits to PCPs). PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of rare diseases in visits of PCPs was the primary outcome. Bivariate analyses and logistic regression analyses were used to compare patients with rare diseases and those without rare diseases and examined characteristics of PCP visits for rare diseases and practice pattern. RESULTS: Among outpatient visits to PCPs, rare diseases account for 1.6% of the visits. The majority of patients with rare diseases were established patients (93.0%) and almost half (49.0%) were enrolled in public insurance programmes. The time spent in visits for rare diseases (22.4 min) and visits for more common diseases (21.3 min) was not significantly different (p=0.09). In an adjusted model controlling for patient characteristics (age, sex, types of insurance, reason for this visit, total number of chronic disease, having a rare disease and established or new patient), patients with rare diseases were 52% more likely to be referred to another provider (OR 1.52, 95% CI, 1.01 to 2.28). CONCLUSIONS: Visits for rare diseases are uncommon in primary care practice. Future research may help to explain whether this low level of management of rare diseases in primary care practice is consistent with a goal of a broad scope of care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6500220 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65002202019-05-21 Prevalence and practice for rare diseases in primary care: a national cross-sectional study in the USA Jo, Ara Larson, Samantha Carek, Peter Peabody, Michael R Peterson, Lars E Mainous, Arch G BMJ Open General practice / Family practice OBJECTIVES: There are more than 7000 rare diseases in the USA, and they are prevalent in 8% of the population. Due to life-threatening risk and limited therapies, early detection and treatment are critical. The purpose of this study was to explore characteristics of visits for patients with rare diseases seen by primary care physicians (PCPs). DESIGN: The study used a cross sectional study using a national representative dataset, the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey for the years 2012–2014. SETTING: Primary care setting. PARTICIPANTS: Visits to PCPs (n=22 306 representing 354 507 772 office visits to PCPs). PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of rare diseases in visits of PCPs was the primary outcome. Bivariate analyses and logistic regression analyses were used to compare patients with rare diseases and those without rare diseases and examined characteristics of PCP visits for rare diseases and practice pattern. RESULTS: Among outpatient visits to PCPs, rare diseases account for 1.6% of the visits. The majority of patients with rare diseases were established patients (93.0%) and almost half (49.0%) were enrolled in public insurance programmes. The time spent in visits for rare diseases (22.4 min) and visits for more common diseases (21.3 min) was not significantly different (p=0.09). In an adjusted model controlling for patient characteristics (age, sex, types of insurance, reason for this visit, total number of chronic disease, having a rare disease and established or new patient), patients with rare diseases were 52% more likely to be referred to another provider (OR 1.52, 95% CI, 1.01 to 2.28). CONCLUSIONS: Visits for rare diseases are uncommon in primary care practice. Future research may help to explain whether this low level of management of rare diseases in primary care practice is consistent with a goal of a broad scope of care. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6500220/ /pubmed/30940763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027248 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | General practice / Family practice Jo, Ara Larson, Samantha Carek, Peter Peabody, Michael R Peterson, Lars E Mainous, Arch G Prevalence and practice for rare diseases in primary care: a national cross-sectional study in the USA |
title | Prevalence and practice for rare diseases in primary care: a national cross-sectional study in the USA |
title_full | Prevalence and practice for rare diseases in primary care: a national cross-sectional study in the USA |
title_fullStr | Prevalence and practice for rare diseases in primary care: a national cross-sectional study in the USA |
title_full_unstemmed | Prevalence and practice for rare diseases in primary care: a national cross-sectional study in the USA |
title_short | Prevalence and practice for rare diseases in primary care: a national cross-sectional study in the USA |
title_sort | prevalence and practice for rare diseases in primary care: a national cross-sectional study in the usa |
topic | General practice / Family practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500220/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30940763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027248 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT joara prevalenceandpracticeforrarediseasesinprimarycareanationalcrosssectionalstudyintheusa AT larsonsamantha prevalenceandpracticeforrarediseasesinprimarycareanationalcrosssectionalstudyintheusa AT carekpeter prevalenceandpracticeforrarediseasesinprimarycareanationalcrosssectionalstudyintheusa AT peabodymichaelr prevalenceandpracticeforrarediseasesinprimarycareanationalcrosssectionalstudyintheusa AT petersonlarse prevalenceandpracticeforrarediseasesinprimarycareanationalcrosssectionalstudyintheusa AT mainousarchg prevalenceandpracticeforrarediseasesinprimarycareanationalcrosssectionalstudyintheusa |