Cargando…
Suffering measurement instruments in palliative care: protocol for a systematic psychometric review
INTRODUCTION: The prevention and relief of suffering are regarded as a goal at the end of life; therefore, suffering assessment at the end of life is essential. In this regard, we need instruments that allow us to evaluate this construct for gathering more evidence, as the assessment of suffering is...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500222/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30948616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027524 |
_version_ | 1783415906105294848 |
---|---|
author | Gutiérrez Sánchez, Daniel Gómez García, Rafael López-Medina, Isabel María Cuesta-Vargas, Antonio I |
author_facet | Gutiérrez Sánchez, Daniel Gómez García, Rafael López-Medina, Isabel María Cuesta-Vargas, Antonio I |
author_sort | Gutiérrez Sánchez, Daniel |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The prevention and relief of suffering are regarded as a goal at the end of life; therefore, suffering assessment at the end of life is essential. In this regard, we need instruments that allow us to evaluate this construct for gathering more evidence, as the assessment of suffering is increasingly used in research and the clinical setting. Many measures have been designed to assess this construct, and the selection of the most appropriate instrument is crucial. The aims of this systematic review are to (1) identify the measures assessing suffering in patients with advanced disease and their psychometric properties and (2) evaluate the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The protocol of this systematic review was developed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols Guidelines. A systematic psychometric review of measures assessing suffering in patients with advanced disease and their psychometric properties will be carried out according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments (COSMIN). The search strategy will be performed following the Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies. Searches will be conducted in Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Medline, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, SciELO, Open Grey, Scopus, Web of Science and COSMIN database of systematic reviews, and it will be limited by time (1980–2018) and language (only literature in English and Spanish). Literature will be evaluated by two independent reviewers according to the COSMIN checklist, and measurement properties data of each study that meet the inclusion criteria will be scored independently by two researchers according to COSMIN quality ratings. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not necessary for systematic review protocols. The results will be disseminated by publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at a relevant conference. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018106488. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6500222 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65002222019-05-21 Suffering measurement instruments in palliative care: protocol for a systematic psychometric review Gutiérrez Sánchez, Daniel Gómez García, Rafael López-Medina, Isabel María Cuesta-Vargas, Antonio I BMJ Open Palliative Care INTRODUCTION: The prevention and relief of suffering are regarded as a goal at the end of life; therefore, suffering assessment at the end of life is essential. In this regard, we need instruments that allow us to evaluate this construct for gathering more evidence, as the assessment of suffering is increasingly used in research and the clinical setting. Many measures have been designed to assess this construct, and the selection of the most appropriate instrument is crucial. The aims of this systematic review are to (1) identify the measures assessing suffering in patients with advanced disease and their psychometric properties and (2) evaluate the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The protocol of this systematic review was developed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols Guidelines. A systematic psychometric review of measures assessing suffering in patients with advanced disease and their psychometric properties will be carried out according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments (COSMIN). The search strategy will be performed following the Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies. Searches will be conducted in Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Medline, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, SciELO, Open Grey, Scopus, Web of Science and COSMIN database of systematic reviews, and it will be limited by time (1980–2018) and language (only literature in English and Spanish). Literature will be evaluated by two independent reviewers according to the COSMIN checklist, and measurement properties data of each study that meet the inclusion criteria will be scored independently by two researchers according to COSMIN quality ratings. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not necessary for systematic review protocols. The results will be disseminated by publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at a relevant conference. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018106488. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6500222/ /pubmed/30948616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027524 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Palliative Care Gutiérrez Sánchez, Daniel Gómez García, Rafael López-Medina, Isabel María Cuesta-Vargas, Antonio I Suffering measurement instruments in palliative care: protocol for a systematic psychometric review |
title | Suffering measurement instruments in palliative care: protocol for a systematic psychometric review |
title_full | Suffering measurement instruments in palliative care: protocol for a systematic psychometric review |
title_fullStr | Suffering measurement instruments in palliative care: protocol for a systematic psychometric review |
title_full_unstemmed | Suffering measurement instruments in palliative care: protocol for a systematic psychometric review |
title_short | Suffering measurement instruments in palliative care: protocol for a systematic psychometric review |
title_sort | suffering measurement instruments in palliative care: protocol for a systematic psychometric review |
topic | Palliative Care |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500222/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30948616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027524 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gutierrezsanchezdaniel sufferingmeasurementinstrumentsinpalliativecareprotocolforasystematicpsychometricreview AT gomezgarciarafael sufferingmeasurementinstrumentsinpalliativecareprotocolforasystematicpsychometricreview AT lopezmedinaisabelmaria sufferingmeasurementinstrumentsinpalliativecareprotocolforasystematicpsychometricreview AT cuestavargasantonioi sufferingmeasurementinstrumentsinpalliativecareprotocolforasystematicpsychometricreview |