Cargando…

What are the positive drivers and potential barriers to implementation of hospital at home selected by low-risk DECAF score in the UK: a qualitative study embedded within a randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: Hospital at home (HAH) for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation selected by low-risk Dyspnoea, Eosinopenia, Consolidation, Acidaemia and atrial Fibrillation (DECAF) score is clinical and cost-effective; DECAF is a prognostic score indicating risk of mortality. Up to 50% of a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dismore, Lorelle Louise, Echevarria, Carlos, van Wersch, Anna, Gibson, John, Bourke, Stephen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30948606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026609
_version_ 1783415907749462016
author Dismore, Lorelle Louise
Echevarria, Carlos
van Wersch, Anna
Gibson, John
Bourke, Stephen
author_facet Dismore, Lorelle Louise
Echevarria, Carlos
van Wersch, Anna
Gibson, John
Bourke, Stephen
author_sort Dismore, Lorelle Louise
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Hospital at home (HAH) for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation selected by low-risk Dyspnoea, Eosinopenia, Consolidation, Acidaemia and atrial Fibrillation (DECAF) score is clinical and cost-effective; DECAF is a prognostic score indicating risk of mortality. Up to 50% of admitted patients are suitable, a much larger proportion than earlier services. Introduction of new models of care is challenging, but may be facilitated by informed engagement with stakeholders. This qualitative study sought to identify facilitators and barriers to implementation of HAH. DESIGN: Semistructured interviews, data were analysed using thematic-construct analysis. SETTING: Interviews were conducted within patients’ homes and hospitals in North East England. PARTICIPANTS: 89 participants were interviewees; 44 patients, 15 carers, 15 physicians, 11 specialist nurses and 4 managers. RESULTS: Facilitators include the following: (1) availability of home comforts and maintaining independence (with positive influences on perceived rate of recovery, sleep quality and convenience for friends, family and carers) and (2) confidence in the continuity of HAH care. Barriers include the following: (1) fear of being alone at home; (2) privacy issues and not wanting visitors and (3) resistance to change. Clinician concerns occasionally delayed return home, principally during the early phase of the trial. Nurses cited higher workload and greater responsibility, but with additional resource and training; overall, they viewed HAH positively. Operational concerns included keeping medical records in a patient’s home and inability to capture activity within current payment systems. CONCLUSION: HAH selected by DECAF was preferred to inpatient care by most patients and their families. Implementation in other hospitals will require education, training and service planning, tailored to overcome the identified barriers. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN29082260.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6500229
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65002292019-05-21 What are the positive drivers and potential barriers to implementation of hospital at home selected by low-risk DECAF score in the UK: a qualitative study embedded within a randomised controlled trial Dismore, Lorelle Louise Echevarria, Carlos van Wersch, Anna Gibson, John Bourke, Stephen BMJ Open Qualitative Research OBJECTIVE: Hospital at home (HAH) for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation selected by low-risk Dyspnoea, Eosinopenia, Consolidation, Acidaemia and atrial Fibrillation (DECAF) score is clinical and cost-effective; DECAF is a prognostic score indicating risk of mortality. Up to 50% of admitted patients are suitable, a much larger proportion than earlier services. Introduction of new models of care is challenging, but may be facilitated by informed engagement with stakeholders. This qualitative study sought to identify facilitators and barriers to implementation of HAH. DESIGN: Semistructured interviews, data were analysed using thematic-construct analysis. SETTING: Interviews were conducted within patients’ homes and hospitals in North East England. PARTICIPANTS: 89 participants were interviewees; 44 patients, 15 carers, 15 physicians, 11 specialist nurses and 4 managers. RESULTS: Facilitators include the following: (1) availability of home comforts and maintaining independence (with positive influences on perceived rate of recovery, sleep quality and convenience for friends, family and carers) and (2) confidence in the continuity of HAH care. Barriers include the following: (1) fear of being alone at home; (2) privacy issues and not wanting visitors and (3) resistance to change. Clinician concerns occasionally delayed return home, principally during the early phase of the trial. Nurses cited higher workload and greater responsibility, but with additional resource and training; overall, they viewed HAH positively. Operational concerns included keeping medical records in a patient’s home and inability to capture activity within current payment systems. CONCLUSION: HAH selected by DECAF was preferred to inpatient care by most patients and their families. Implementation in other hospitals will require education, training and service planning, tailored to overcome the identified barriers. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN29082260. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6500229/ /pubmed/30948606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026609 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Qualitative Research
Dismore, Lorelle Louise
Echevarria, Carlos
van Wersch, Anna
Gibson, John
Bourke, Stephen
What are the positive drivers and potential barriers to implementation of hospital at home selected by low-risk DECAF score in the UK: a qualitative study embedded within a randomised controlled trial
title What are the positive drivers and potential barriers to implementation of hospital at home selected by low-risk DECAF score in the UK: a qualitative study embedded within a randomised controlled trial
title_full What are the positive drivers and potential barriers to implementation of hospital at home selected by low-risk DECAF score in the UK: a qualitative study embedded within a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr What are the positive drivers and potential barriers to implementation of hospital at home selected by low-risk DECAF score in the UK: a qualitative study embedded within a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed What are the positive drivers and potential barriers to implementation of hospital at home selected by low-risk DECAF score in the UK: a qualitative study embedded within a randomised controlled trial
title_short What are the positive drivers and potential barriers to implementation of hospital at home selected by low-risk DECAF score in the UK: a qualitative study embedded within a randomised controlled trial
title_sort what are the positive drivers and potential barriers to implementation of hospital at home selected by low-risk decaf score in the uk: a qualitative study embedded within a randomised controlled trial
topic Qualitative Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30948606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026609
work_keys_str_mv AT dismorelorellelouise whatarethepositivedriversandpotentialbarrierstoimplementationofhospitalathomeselectedbylowriskdecafscoreintheukaqualitativestudyembeddedwithinarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT echevarriacarlos whatarethepositivedriversandpotentialbarrierstoimplementationofhospitalathomeselectedbylowriskdecafscoreintheukaqualitativestudyembeddedwithinarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vanwerschanna whatarethepositivedriversandpotentialbarrierstoimplementationofhospitalathomeselectedbylowriskdecafscoreintheukaqualitativestudyembeddedwithinarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT gibsonjohn whatarethepositivedriversandpotentialbarrierstoimplementationofhospitalathomeselectedbylowriskdecafscoreintheukaqualitativestudyembeddedwithinarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bourkestephen whatarethepositivedriversandpotentialbarrierstoimplementationofhospitalathomeselectedbylowriskdecafscoreintheukaqualitativestudyembeddedwithinarandomisedcontrolledtrial