Cargando…
Primary care physicians’ decision-making processes in the context of multimorbidity: protocol of a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research
INTRODUCTION: Good patient outcomes correlate with the physicians’ capacity for good clinical judgement. Multimorbidity is common and it increases uncertainty and complexity in the clinical encounter. However, healthcare systems and medical education are centred on individual diseases. In consequenc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500233/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30948566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023832 |
_version_ | 1783415908673257472 |
---|---|
author | Silvério Rodrigues, David Sousa, Paulo Faria Basílio, Nuno Antunes, Ana Antunes, Maria da Luz Santos, Maria Isabel Heleno, Bruno |
author_facet | Silvério Rodrigues, David Sousa, Paulo Faria Basílio, Nuno Antunes, Ana Antunes, Maria da Luz Santos, Maria Isabel Heleno, Bruno |
author_sort | Silvério Rodrigues, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Good patient outcomes correlate with the physicians’ capacity for good clinical judgement. Multimorbidity is common and it increases uncertainty and complexity in the clinical encounter. However, healthcare systems and medical education are centred on individual diseases. In consequence, recognition of the patient as the centre of the decision-making process becomes even more difficult. Research in clinical reasoning and medical decision in a real-world context is needed. The aim of the present review is to identify and synthesise available qualitative evidence on primary care physicians’ perspectives, views or experiences on decision-making with patients with multimorbidity. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This will be a systematic review of qualitative research where PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase and Web of Science will be searched, supplemented with manual searches of reference lists of included studies. Qualitative studies published in Portuguese, Spanish and English language will be included, with no date limit. Studies will be eligible when they evaluate family physicians’ perspectives, opinions or perceptions on decision-making for patients with multimorbidity in primary care. The methodological quality of studies selected for retrieval will be assessed by two independent reviewers before inclusion in the review using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool. Thematic synthesis will be used to identify key categories and themes from the qualitative data. The Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research approach will be used to assess how much confidence to place in findings from the qualitative evidence synthesis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This review will use published data. No ethical issues are foreseen. The findings will be disseminated to the medical community via journal publication and conference presentation(s). PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: ID 91978. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6500233 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65002332019-05-21 Primary care physicians’ decision-making processes in the context of multimorbidity: protocol of a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research Silvério Rodrigues, David Sousa, Paulo Faria Basílio, Nuno Antunes, Ana Antunes, Maria da Luz Santos, Maria Isabel Heleno, Bruno BMJ Open Qualitative Research INTRODUCTION: Good patient outcomes correlate with the physicians’ capacity for good clinical judgement. Multimorbidity is common and it increases uncertainty and complexity in the clinical encounter. However, healthcare systems and medical education are centred on individual diseases. In consequence, recognition of the patient as the centre of the decision-making process becomes even more difficult. Research in clinical reasoning and medical decision in a real-world context is needed. The aim of the present review is to identify and synthesise available qualitative evidence on primary care physicians’ perspectives, views or experiences on decision-making with patients with multimorbidity. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This will be a systematic review of qualitative research where PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase and Web of Science will be searched, supplemented with manual searches of reference lists of included studies. Qualitative studies published in Portuguese, Spanish and English language will be included, with no date limit. Studies will be eligible when they evaluate family physicians’ perspectives, opinions or perceptions on decision-making for patients with multimorbidity in primary care. The methodological quality of studies selected for retrieval will be assessed by two independent reviewers before inclusion in the review using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool. Thematic synthesis will be used to identify key categories and themes from the qualitative data. The Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research approach will be used to assess how much confidence to place in findings from the qualitative evidence synthesis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This review will use published data. No ethical issues are foreseen. The findings will be disseminated to the medical community via journal publication and conference presentation(s). PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: ID 91978. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6500233/ /pubmed/30948566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023832 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Qualitative Research Silvério Rodrigues, David Sousa, Paulo Faria Basílio, Nuno Antunes, Ana Antunes, Maria da Luz Santos, Maria Isabel Heleno, Bruno Primary care physicians’ decision-making processes in the context of multimorbidity: protocol of a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research |
title | Primary care physicians’ decision-making processes in the context of multimorbidity: protocol of a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research |
title_full | Primary care physicians’ decision-making processes in the context of multimorbidity: protocol of a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research |
title_fullStr | Primary care physicians’ decision-making processes in the context of multimorbidity: protocol of a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research |
title_full_unstemmed | Primary care physicians’ decision-making processes in the context of multimorbidity: protocol of a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research |
title_short | Primary care physicians’ decision-making processes in the context of multimorbidity: protocol of a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research |
title_sort | primary care physicians’ decision-making processes in the context of multimorbidity: protocol of a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research |
topic | Qualitative Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500233/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30948566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023832 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT silveriorodriguesdavid primarycarephysiciansdecisionmakingprocessesinthecontextofmultimorbidityprotocolofasystematicreviewandthematicsynthesisofqualitativeresearch AT sousapaulofaria primarycarephysiciansdecisionmakingprocessesinthecontextofmultimorbidityprotocolofasystematicreviewandthematicsynthesisofqualitativeresearch AT basilionuno primarycarephysiciansdecisionmakingprocessesinthecontextofmultimorbidityprotocolofasystematicreviewandthematicsynthesisofqualitativeresearch AT antunesana primarycarephysiciansdecisionmakingprocessesinthecontextofmultimorbidityprotocolofasystematicreviewandthematicsynthesisofqualitativeresearch AT antunesmariadaluz primarycarephysiciansdecisionmakingprocessesinthecontextofmultimorbidityprotocolofasystematicreviewandthematicsynthesisofqualitativeresearch AT santosmariaisabel primarycarephysiciansdecisionmakingprocessesinthecontextofmultimorbidityprotocolofasystematicreviewandthematicsynthesisofqualitativeresearch AT helenobruno primarycarephysiciansdecisionmakingprocessesinthecontextofmultimorbidityprotocolofasystematicreviewandthematicsynthesisofqualitativeresearch |