Cargando…

Primary care physicians’ decision-making processes in the context of multimorbidity: protocol of a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research

INTRODUCTION: Good patient outcomes correlate with the physicians’ capacity for good clinical judgement. Multimorbidity is common and it increases uncertainty and complexity in the clinical encounter. However, healthcare systems and medical education are centred on individual diseases. In consequenc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Silvério Rodrigues, David, Sousa, Paulo Faria, Basílio, Nuno, Antunes, Ana, Antunes, Maria da Luz, Santos, Maria Isabel, Heleno, Bruno
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30948566
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023832
_version_ 1783415908673257472
author Silvério Rodrigues, David
Sousa, Paulo Faria
Basílio, Nuno
Antunes, Ana
Antunes, Maria da Luz
Santos, Maria Isabel
Heleno, Bruno
author_facet Silvério Rodrigues, David
Sousa, Paulo Faria
Basílio, Nuno
Antunes, Ana
Antunes, Maria da Luz
Santos, Maria Isabel
Heleno, Bruno
author_sort Silvério Rodrigues, David
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Good patient outcomes correlate with the physicians’ capacity for good clinical judgement. Multimorbidity is common and it increases uncertainty and complexity in the clinical encounter. However, healthcare systems and medical education are centred on individual diseases. In consequence, recognition of the patient as the centre of the decision-making process becomes even more difficult. Research in clinical reasoning and medical decision in a real-world context is needed. The aim of the present review is to identify and synthesise available qualitative evidence on primary care physicians’ perspectives, views or experiences on decision-making with patients with multimorbidity. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This will be a systematic review of qualitative research where PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase and Web of Science will be searched, supplemented with manual searches of reference lists of included studies. Qualitative studies published in Portuguese, Spanish and English language will be included, with no date limit. Studies will be eligible when they evaluate family physicians’ perspectives, opinions or perceptions on decision-making for patients with multimorbidity in primary care. The methodological quality of studies selected for retrieval will be assessed by two independent reviewers before inclusion in the review using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool. Thematic synthesis will be used to identify key categories and themes from the qualitative data. The Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research approach will be used to assess how much confidence to place in findings from the qualitative evidence synthesis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This review will use published data. No ethical issues are foreseen. The findings will be disseminated to the medical community via journal publication and conference presentation(s). PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: ID 91978.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6500233
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65002332019-05-21 Primary care physicians’ decision-making processes in the context of multimorbidity: protocol of a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research Silvério Rodrigues, David Sousa, Paulo Faria Basílio, Nuno Antunes, Ana Antunes, Maria da Luz Santos, Maria Isabel Heleno, Bruno BMJ Open Qualitative Research INTRODUCTION: Good patient outcomes correlate with the physicians’ capacity for good clinical judgement. Multimorbidity is common and it increases uncertainty and complexity in the clinical encounter. However, healthcare systems and medical education are centred on individual diseases. In consequence, recognition of the patient as the centre of the decision-making process becomes even more difficult. Research in clinical reasoning and medical decision in a real-world context is needed. The aim of the present review is to identify and synthesise available qualitative evidence on primary care physicians’ perspectives, views or experiences on decision-making with patients with multimorbidity. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This will be a systematic review of qualitative research where PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase and Web of Science will be searched, supplemented with manual searches of reference lists of included studies. Qualitative studies published in Portuguese, Spanish and English language will be included, with no date limit. Studies will be eligible when they evaluate family physicians’ perspectives, opinions or perceptions on decision-making for patients with multimorbidity in primary care. The methodological quality of studies selected for retrieval will be assessed by two independent reviewers before inclusion in the review using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool. Thematic synthesis will be used to identify key categories and themes from the qualitative data. The Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research approach will be used to assess how much confidence to place in findings from the qualitative evidence synthesis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This review will use published data. No ethical issues are foreseen. The findings will be disseminated to the medical community via journal publication and conference presentation(s). PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: ID 91978. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6500233/ /pubmed/30948566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023832 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Qualitative Research
Silvério Rodrigues, David
Sousa, Paulo Faria
Basílio, Nuno
Antunes, Ana
Antunes, Maria da Luz
Santos, Maria Isabel
Heleno, Bruno
Primary care physicians’ decision-making processes in the context of multimorbidity: protocol of a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research
title Primary care physicians’ decision-making processes in the context of multimorbidity: protocol of a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research
title_full Primary care physicians’ decision-making processes in the context of multimorbidity: protocol of a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research
title_fullStr Primary care physicians’ decision-making processes in the context of multimorbidity: protocol of a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research
title_full_unstemmed Primary care physicians’ decision-making processes in the context of multimorbidity: protocol of a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research
title_short Primary care physicians’ decision-making processes in the context of multimorbidity: protocol of a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research
title_sort primary care physicians’ decision-making processes in the context of multimorbidity: protocol of a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research
topic Qualitative Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30948566
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023832
work_keys_str_mv AT silveriorodriguesdavid primarycarephysiciansdecisionmakingprocessesinthecontextofmultimorbidityprotocolofasystematicreviewandthematicsynthesisofqualitativeresearch
AT sousapaulofaria primarycarephysiciansdecisionmakingprocessesinthecontextofmultimorbidityprotocolofasystematicreviewandthematicsynthesisofqualitativeresearch
AT basilionuno primarycarephysiciansdecisionmakingprocessesinthecontextofmultimorbidityprotocolofasystematicreviewandthematicsynthesisofqualitativeresearch
AT antunesana primarycarephysiciansdecisionmakingprocessesinthecontextofmultimorbidityprotocolofasystematicreviewandthematicsynthesisofqualitativeresearch
AT antunesmariadaluz primarycarephysiciansdecisionmakingprocessesinthecontextofmultimorbidityprotocolofasystematicreviewandthematicsynthesisofqualitativeresearch
AT santosmariaisabel primarycarephysiciansdecisionmakingprocessesinthecontextofmultimorbidityprotocolofasystematicreviewandthematicsynthesisofqualitativeresearch
AT helenobruno primarycarephysiciansdecisionmakingprocessesinthecontextofmultimorbidityprotocolofasystematicreviewandthematicsynthesisofqualitativeresearch