Cargando…

Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Individual-Level Abortion Stigma Scale: a methodological study

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Individual-Level Abortion Stigma Scale. SETTING: Three hospitals affiliated to Public Hospitals Union General Secretariat in Manisa, a city located in Western Turkey. DESIGN: This was a methodo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cetinkaya, Aynur, Özmen, Dilek, Uyar, Fatma, Tayhan, Ali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30948573
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024686
_version_ 1783415921042259968
author Cetinkaya, Aynur
Özmen, Dilek
Uyar, Fatma
Tayhan, Ali
author_facet Cetinkaya, Aynur
Özmen, Dilek
Uyar, Fatma
Tayhan, Ali
author_sort Cetinkaya, Aynur
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Individual-Level Abortion Stigma Scale. SETTING: Three hospitals affiliated to Public Hospitals Union General Secretariat in Manisa, a city located in Western Turkey. DESIGN: This was a methodological study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 230 women aged 22–49 years who previously underwent abortion and volunteered to participate in the study. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Data analysis was performed using the SPSS and LISREL software. The Content Validity Index was calculated based on the values obtained from expert opinions. In the reliability analysis, Cronbach’s alpha values were calculated for the overall scale and its subscales. To test the stability of the scale over time, the scale was readministered to 30 women in the study 15 days later and the test–retest values (Pearson’s correlation coefficients) were determined. In the validity analysis, the exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed. In the exploratory factor analysis, the principal component analysis was performed using the varimax rotation and the factor loading of the scale was examined. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed to investigate the item-factor construct of the scale. RESULTS: The Content Validity Index was calculated as 0.86. The Cronbach’s alpha values ranged between 0.83 and 0.94. The item-total correlation coefficients ranged between 0.36 and 0.72, and the test–retest reliability was 0.96 for the overall scale and its subscales (p<0.05). The total variance revealed by five factors was 75%. Confirmatory factor analysis of the scale revealed an acceptable compliance level (root mean square error of approximation=0.092, χ(2)/df=2.91, Goodness of Fit Index=0.831, Comparative Fit Index=0.928, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that this scale has the potential for use in research and clinical settings to measure abortion stigma among women.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6500284
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65002842019-05-21 Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Individual-Level Abortion Stigma Scale: a methodological study Cetinkaya, Aynur Özmen, Dilek Uyar, Fatma Tayhan, Ali BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Individual-Level Abortion Stigma Scale. SETTING: Three hospitals affiliated to Public Hospitals Union General Secretariat in Manisa, a city located in Western Turkey. DESIGN: This was a methodological study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 230 women aged 22–49 years who previously underwent abortion and volunteered to participate in the study. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Data analysis was performed using the SPSS and LISREL software. The Content Validity Index was calculated based on the values obtained from expert opinions. In the reliability analysis, Cronbach’s alpha values were calculated for the overall scale and its subscales. To test the stability of the scale over time, the scale was readministered to 30 women in the study 15 days later and the test–retest values (Pearson’s correlation coefficients) were determined. In the validity analysis, the exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed. In the exploratory factor analysis, the principal component analysis was performed using the varimax rotation and the factor loading of the scale was examined. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed to investigate the item-factor construct of the scale. RESULTS: The Content Validity Index was calculated as 0.86. The Cronbach’s alpha values ranged between 0.83 and 0.94. The item-total correlation coefficients ranged between 0.36 and 0.72, and the test–retest reliability was 0.96 for the overall scale and its subscales (p<0.05). The total variance revealed by five factors was 75%. Confirmatory factor analysis of the scale revealed an acceptable compliance level (root mean square error of approximation=0.092, χ(2)/df=2.91, Goodness of Fit Index=0.831, Comparative Fit Index=0.928, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that this scale has the potential for use in research and clinical settings to measure abortion stigma among women. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6500284/ /pubmed/30948573 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024686 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Public Health
Cetinkaya, Aynur
Özmen, Dilek
Uyar, Fatma
Tayhan, Ali
Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Individual-Level Abortion Stigma Scale: a methodological study
title Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Individual-Level Abortion Stigma Scale: a methodological study
title_full Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Individual-Level Abortion Stigma Scale: a methodological study
title_fullStr Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Individual-Level Abortion Stigma Scale: a methodological study
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Individual-Level Abortion Stigma Scale: a methodological study
title_short Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Individual-Level Abortion Stigma Scale: a methodological study
title_sort reliability and validity of the turkish version of the individual-level abortion stigma scale: a methodological study
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30948573
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024686
work_keys_str_mv AT cetinkayaaynur reliabilityandvalidityoftheturkishversionoftheindividuallevelabortionstigmascaleamethodologicalstudy
AT ozmendilek reliabilityandvalidityoftheturkishversionoftheindividuallevelabortionstigmascaleamethodologicalstudy
AT uyarfatma reliabilityandvalidityoftheturkishversionoftheindividuallevelabortionstigmascaleamethodologicalstudy
AT tayhanali reliabilityandvalidityoftheturkishversionoftheindividuallevelabortionstigmascaleamethodologicalstudy