Cargando…
Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Individual-Level Abortion Stigma Scale: a methodological study
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Individual-Level Abortion Stigma Scale. SETTING: Three hospitals affiliated to Public Hospitals Union General Secretariat in Manisa, a city located in Western Turkey. DESIGN: This was a methodo...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500284/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30948573 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024686 |
_version_ | 1783415921042259968 |
---|---|
author | Cetinkaya, Aynur Özmen, Dilek Uyar, Fatma Tayhan, Ali |
author_facet | Cetinkaya, Aynur Özmen, Dilek Uyar, Fatma Tayhan, Ali |
author_sort | Cetinkaya, Aynur |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Individual-Level Abortion Stigma Scale. SETTING: Three hospitals affiliated to Public Hospitals Union General Secretariat in Manisa, a city located in Western Turkey. DESIGN: This was a methodological study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 230 women aged 22–49 years who previously underwent abortion and volunteered to participate in the study. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Data analysis was performed using the SPSS and LISREL software. The Content Validity Index was calculated based on the values obtained from expert opinions. In the reliability analysis, Cronbach’s alpha values were calculated for the overall scale and its subscales. To test the stability of the scale over time, the scale was readministered to 30 women in the study 15 days later and the test–retest values (Pearson’s correlation coefficients) were determined. In the validity analysis, the exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed. In the exploratory factor analysis, the principal component analysis was performed using the varimax rotation and the factor loading of the scale was examined. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed to investigate the item-factor construct of the scale. RESULTS: The Content Validity Index was calculated as 0.86. The Cronbach’s alpha values ranged between 0.83 and 0.94. The item-total correlation coefficients ranged between 0.36 and 0.72, and the test–retest reliability was 0.96 for the overall scale and its subscales (p<0.05). The total variance revealed by five factors was 75%. Confirmatory factor analysis of the scale revealed an acceptable compliance level (root mean square error of approximation=0.092, χ(2)/df=2.91, Goodness of Fit Index=0.831, Comparative Fit Index=0.928, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that this scale has the potential for use in research and clinical settings to measure abortion stigma among women. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6500284 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65002842019-05-21 Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Individual-Level Abortion Stigma Scale: a methodological study Cetinkaya, Aynur Özmen, Dilek Uyar, Fatma Tayhan, Ali BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Individual-Level Abortion Stigma Scale. SETTING: Three hospitals affiliated to Public Hospitals Union General Secretariat in Manisa, a city located in Western Turkey. DESIGN: This was a methodological study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 230 women aged 22–49 years who previously underwent abortion and volunteered to participate in the study. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Data analysis was performed using the SPSS and LISREL software. The Content Validity Index was calculated based on the values obtained from expert opinions. In the reliability analysis, Cronbach’s alpha values were calculated for the overall scale and its subscales. To test the stability of the scale over time, the scale was readministered to 30 women in the study 15 days later and the test–retest values (Pearson’s correlation coefficients) were determined. In the validity analysis, the exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed. In the exploratory factor analysis, the principal component analysis was performed using the varimax rotation and the factor loading of the scale was examined. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed to investigate the item-factor construct of the scale. RESULTS: The Content Validity Index was calculated as 0.86. The Cronbach’s alpha values ranged between 0.83 and 0.94. The item-total correlation coefficients ranged between 0.36 and 0.72, and the test–retest reliability was 0.96 for the overall scale and its subscales (p<0.05). The total variance revealed by five factors was 75%. Confirmatory factor analysis of the scale revealed an acceptable compliance level (root mean square error of approximation=0.092, χ(2)/df=2.91, Goodness of Fit Index=0.831, Comparative Fit Index=0.928, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that this scale has the potential for use in research and clinical settings to measure abortion stigma among women. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6500284/ /pubmed/30948573 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024686 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Cetinkaya, Aynur Özmen, Dilek Uyar, Fatma Tayhan, Ali Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Individual-Level Abortion Stigma Scale: a methodological study |
title | Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Individual-Level Abortion Stigma Scale: a methodological study |
title_full | Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Individual-Level Abortion Stigma Scale: a methodological study |
title_fullStr | Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Individual-Level Abortion Stigma Scale: a methodological study |
title_full_unstemmed | Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Individual-Level Abortion Stigma Scale: a methodological study |
title_short | Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Individual-Level Abortion Stigma Scale: a methodological study |
title_sort | reliability and validity of the turkish version of the individual-level abortion stigma scale: a methodological study |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500284/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30948573 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024686 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cetinkayaaynur reliabilityandvalidityoftheturkishversionoftheindividuallevelabortionstigmascaleamethodologicalstudy AT ozmendilek reliabilityandvalidityoftheturkishversionoftheindividuallevelabortionstigmascaleamethodologicalstudy AT uyarfatma reliabilityandvalidityoftheturkishversionoftheindividuallevelabortionstigmascaleamethodologicalstudy AT tayhanali reliabilityandvalidityoftheturkishversionoftheindividuallevelabortionstigmascaleamethodologicalstudy |