Cargando…

Exploring the clinical context of adopting an instrumented insole: a qualitative study of clinicians’ preferences in England

OBJECTIVES: This study explores clinicians’ views of the clinical uptake of a smart pressure-sensing insole, named Flexifoot, to enhance the care and management of patients with osteoarthritis (OA). Clinicians are key users of wearable technologies, and can provide appropriate feedback for a specifi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Denise, Papi, Enrica, McGregor, Alison H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31005908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023656
_version_ 1783415921282383872
author Lin, Denise
Papi, Enrica
McGregor, Alison H
author_facet Lin, Denise
Papi, Enrica
McGregor, Alison H
author_sort Lin, Denise
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study explores clinicians’ views of the clinical uptake of a smart pressure-sensing insole, named Flexifoot, to enhance the care and management of patients with osteoarthritis (OA). Clinicians are key users of wearable technologies, and can provide appropriate feedback for a specific device for successful clinical implementation. DESIGN: Qualitative study with in-depth, semi-structured interviews, analysed using inductive analysis to generate key themes. SETTING: Conducted in a University setting. PARTICIPANTS: 30 clinicians were interviewed (11 physiotherapists, 11 orthopaedic surgeons, 5 general practitioners, 3 podiatrists). RESULTS: All clinicians regarded Flexifoot to be useful for the care and management of patients in adjunction to current methods. Responses revealed four main themes: use, data presentation, barriers to use and future development. Flexifoot data were recognised as capable of enhancing information exchange between clinicians and patients, and also between clinicians themselves. Participants supported the use of feedback for rehabilitation, screening and evaluation of treatment progress/success purposes. Flexifoot use by patients was encouraged as a self-management tool that may motivate them by setting attainment goals. The data interface should be secure, concise and visually appealing. The measured parameters of Flexifoot, its duration of wear and frequency of data output would all depend on the rationale for its use. The clinicians and patients must collaborate to optimise the use of Flexifoot for long-term monitoring of disease for patient care in clinical practice. Many identified potential other uses for Flexifoot. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians thought that Flexifoot may complement and improve current methods of long-term patient management for OA or other conditions in clinical settings. Flexifoot was recognised to be useful for objective measures and should be tailored carefully for each person and condition to maximise compliance. Adopting the device, and other similar technologies, requires reducing the main barriers to use (time, cost, patient compliance) before its successful implementation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6500285
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65002852019-05-21 Exploring the clinical context of adopting an instrumented insole: a qualitative study of clinicians’ preferences in England Lin, Denise Papi, Enrica McGregor, Alison H BMJ Open Qualitative Research OBJECTIVES: This study explores clinicians’ views of the clinical uptake of a smart pressure-sensing insole, named Flexifoot, to enhance the care and management of patients with osteoarthritis (OA). Clinicians are key users of wearable technologies, and can provide appropriate feedback for a specific device for successful clinical implementation. DESIGN: Qualitative study with in-depth, semi-structured interviews, analysed using inductive analysis to generate key themes. SETTING: Conducted in a University setting. PARTICIPANTS: 30 clinicians were interviewed (11 physiotherapists, 11 orthopaedic surgeons, 5 general practitioners, 3 podiatrists). RESULTS: All clinicians regarded Flexifoot to be useful for the care and management of patients in adjunction to current methods. Responses revealed four main themes: use, data presentation, barriers to use and future development. Flexifoot data were recognised as capable of enhancing information exchange between clinicians and patients, and also between clinicians themselves. Participants supported the use of feedback for rehabilitation, screening and evaluation of treatment progress/success purposes. Flexifoot use by patients was encouraged as a self-management tool that may motivate them by setting attainment goals. The data interface should be secure, concise and visually appealing. The measured parameters of Flexifoot, its duration of wear and frequency of data output would all depend on the rationale for its use. The clinicians and patients must collaborate to optimise the use of Flexifoot for long-term monitoring of disease for patient care in clinical practice. Many identified potential other uses for Flexifoot. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians thought that Flexifoot may complement and improve current methods of long-term patient management for OA or other conditions in clinical settings. Flexifoot was recognised to be useful for objective measures and should be tailored carefully for each person and condition to maximise compliance. Adopting the device, and other similar technologies, requires reducing the main barriers to use (time, cost, patient compliance) before its successful implementation. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6500285/ /pubmed/31005908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023656 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Qualitative Research
Lin, Denise
Papi, Enrica
McGregor, Alison H
Exploring the clinical context of adopting an instrumented insole: a qualitative study of clinicians’ preferences in England
title Exploring the clinical context of adopting an instrumented insole: a qualitative study of clinicians’ preferences in England
title_full Exploring the clinical context of adopting an instrumented insole: a qualitative study of clinicians’ preferences in England
title_fullStr Exploring the clinical context of adopting an instrumented insole: a qualitative study of clinicians’ preferences in England
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the clinical context of adopting an instrumented insole: a qualitative study of clinicians’ preferences in England
title_short Exploring the clinical context of adopting an instrumented insole: a qualitative study of clinicians’ preferences in England
title_sort exploring the clinical context of adopting an instrumented insole: a qualitative study of clinicians’ preferences in england
topic Qualitative Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31005908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023656
work_keys_str_mv AT lindenise exploringtheclinicalcontextofadoptinganinstrumentedinsoleaqualitativestudyofclinicianspreferencesinengland
AT papienrica exploringtheclinicalcontextofadoptinganinstrumentedinsoleaqualitativestudyofclinicianspreferencesinengland
AT mcgregoralisonh exploringtheclinicalcontextofadoptinganinstrumentedinsoleaqualitativestudyofclinicianspreferencesinengland