Cargando…

How human factors affect escalation of care: a protocol for a qualitative evidence synthesis of studies

INTRODUCTION: Failure to rescue is defined as mortality after complications during hospital care. Incidence ranges 10.9%–13.3% and several national reports such as National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcomes and Death and National Institute of Clinical Excellence CG 50 highlight failure to r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ede, Jody, Westgate, Verity, Petrinic, Tatjana, Darbyshire, Julie, Watkinson, Peter J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500321/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30962234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025969
_version_ 1783415929850298368
author Ede, Jody
Westgate, Verity
Petrinic, Tatjana
Darbyshire, Julie
Watkinson, Peter J
author_facet Ede, Jody
Westgate, Verity
Petrinic, Tatjana
Darbyshire, Julie
Watkinson, Peter J
author_sort Ede, Jody
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Failure to rescue is defined as mortality after complications during hospital care. Incidence ranges 10.9%–13.3% and several national reports such as National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcomes and Death and National Institute of Clinical Excellence CG 50 highlight failure to rescue as a significant problem for safe patient care. To avoid failure to rescue events, there must be successful escalation of care. Studies indicate that human factors such as situational awareness, team working, communication and a culture promoting safety contribute to avoidance of failure to rescue events. Understanding human factors is essential to developing work systems that mitigate barriers and facilitate prompt escalation of care. This qualitative evidence synthesis will identify and synthesise what is known about the human factors that affect escalation of care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid) and CINAHL, between database inception and 2018, for studies describing human factors affecting failure to rescue and/or care escalation. A search strategy was developed by two researchers and a medical librarian. Only studies exploring in-hospital (ward) populations using qualitative data collection methods will be included. Screening will be conducted by two researchers. We are likely to undertake a thematic synthesis, using the Thomas and Harden framework. Selected studies will be assessed for quality, rigour and limitations. Two researchers will extract and thematically synthesise codes using a piloted data extraction tool to develop analytical themes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The qualitative evidence synthesis will use available published literature and no ethical approval is required. This synthesis will be limited by the quality of studies, rigour and reproducibility of study findings. Results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal, publicised at conferences and on social media. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018104745.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6500321
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65003212019-05-21 How human factors affect escalation of care: a protocol for a qualitative evidence synthesis of studies Ede, Jody Westgate, Verity Petrinic, Tatjana Darbyshire, Julie Watkinson, Peter J BMJ Open Qualitative Research INTRODUCTION: Failure to rescue is defined as mortality after complications during hospital care. Incidence ranges 10.9%–13.3% and several national reports such as National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcomes and Death and National Institute of Clinical Excellence CG 50 highlight failure to rescue as a significant problem for safe patient care. To avoid failure to rescue events, there must be successful escalation of care. Studies indicate that human factors such as situational awareness, team working, communication and a culture promoting safety contribute to avoidance of failure to rescue events. Understanding human factors is essential to developing work systems that mitigate barriers and facilitate prompt escalation of care. This qualitative evidence synthesis will identify and synthesise what is known about the human factors that affect escalation of care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid) and CINAHL, between database inception and 2018, for studies describing human factors affecting failure to rescue and/or care escalation. A search strategy was developed by two researchers and a medical librarian. Only studies exploring in-hospital (ward) populations using qualitative data collection methods will be included. Screening will be conducted by two researchers. We are likely to undertake a thematic synthesis, using the Thomas and Harden framework. Selected studies will be assessed for quality, rigour and limitations. Two researchers will extract and thematically synthesise codes using a piloted data extraction tool to develop analytical themes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The qualitative evidence synthesis will use available published literature and no ethical approval is required. This synthesis will be limited by the quality of studies, rigour and reproducibility of study findings. Results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal, publicised at conferences and on social media. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018104745. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6500321/ /pubmed/30962234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025969 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Qualitative Research
Ede, Jody
Westgate, Verity
Petrinic, Tatjana
Darbyshire, Julie
Watkinson, Peter J
How human factors affect escalation of care: a protocol for a qualitative evidence synthesis of studies
title How human factors affect escalation of care: a protocol for a qualitative evidence synthesis of studies
title_full How human factors affect escalation of care: a protocol for a qualitative evidence synthesis of studies
title_fullStr How human factors affect escalation of care: a protocol for a qualitative evidence synthesis of studies
title_full_unstemmed How human factors affect escalation of care: a protocol for a qualitative evidence synthesis of studies
title_short How human factors affect escalation of care: a protocol for a qualitative evidence synthesis of studies
title_sort how human factors affect escalation of care: a protocol for a qualitative evidence synthesis of studies
topic Qualitative Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500321/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30962234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025969
work_keys_str_mv AT edejody howhumanfactorsaffectescalationofcareaprotocolforaqualitativeevidencesynthesisofstudies
AT westgateverity howhumanfactorsaffectescalationofcareaprotocolforaqualitativeevidencesynthesisofstudies
AT petrinictatjana howhumanfactorsaffectescalationofcareaprotocolforaqualitativeevidencesynthesisofstudies
AT darbyshirejulie howhumanfactorsaffectescalationofcareaprotocolforaqualitativeevidencesynthesisofstudies
AT watkinsonpeterj howhumanfactorsaffectescalationofcareaprotocolforaqualitativeevidencesynthesisofstudies