Cargando…
Realist evaluation of cancer rehabilitation services in South Wales (REEACaRS): a mixed methods study protocol
INTRODUCTION: Long-term and late effects of cancer treatments can cause functional limitations and reduce quality of life. Cancer rehabilitation services, which can comprise physical exercise, psychological support and educational interventions depending on the individual’s needs, have been found to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500344/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31015271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025953 |
_version_ | 1783415935243124736 |
---|---|
author | Csontos, Judit Katalin Fitzsimmons, Deborah Jones, Mari Wilkinson, Wendy M Horton, Joanne Love-Gould, Lisa Tee, Anna Watts, Tessa |
author_facet | Csontos, Judit Katalin Fitzsimmons, Deborah Jones, Mari Wilkinson, Wendy M Horton, Joanne Love-Gould, Lisa Tee, Anna Watts, Tessa |
author_sort | Csontos, Judit Katalin |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Long-term and late effects of cancer treatments can cause functional limitations and reduce quality of life. Cancer rehabilitation services, which can comprise physical exercise, psychological support and educational interventions depending on the individual’s needs, have been found to have a positive effect on health-related quality of life worldwide. However, accessibility or the lack of awareness on available help can act as barriers and influence the uptake of services, resulting in people having unmet rehabilitation needs. In Wales, UK, 41% of people, who have had health and social care needs resulting from cancer and its treatments, reported that they did not receive care when needed. The reason for this lack of support has not yet been fully investigated. The aim of this study is to investigate the conditions in which cancer rehabilitation services work and their underpinning mechanisms in South Wales, UK, specifically addressing barriers, facilitators and costs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Realist evaluation, which explains for whom a service works in what circumstances and how through context-mechanism-outcome pattern conjunctions, will be used in three phases to investigate the conditions in which cancer rehabilitation services work and their underpinning mechanisms. Phase 1 will be secondary analysis of a cancer rehabilitation database from a local Health Board to give context to who are accessing rehabilitation. Phase 2 will be thematic analysis of face-to-face, semistructured rehabilitation participant (n=20) and healthcare professional (n=20) interviews to explore the mechanisms of how cancer rehabilitation works. Phase 3 will be two case studies and cost-consequences analysis of cancer rehabilitation services. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study received favourable ethical opinion from London South-East Research Ethics Committee (17/LO/2123) in December 2017. This project is part of the author’s PhD thesis and it is expected that the findings will be disseminated in academic journals and at local and international conferences. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6500344 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65003442019-05-21 Realist evaluation of cancer rehabilitation services in South Wales (REEACaRS): a mixed methods study protocol Csontos, Judit Katalin Fitzsimmons, Deborah Jones, Mari Wilkinson, Wendy M Horton, Joanne Love-Gould, Lisa Tee, Anna Watts, Tessa BMJ Open Oncology INTRODUCTION: Long-term and late effects of cancer treatments can cause functional limitations and reduce quality of life. Cancer rehabilitation services, which can comprise physical exercise, psychological support and educational interventions depending on the individual’s needs, have been found to have a positive effect on health-related quality of life worldwide. However, accessibility or the lack of awareness on available help can act as barriers and influence the uptake of services, resulting in people having unmet rehabilitation needs. In Wales, UK, 41% of people, who have had health and social care needs resulting from cancer and its treatments, reported that they did not receive care when needed. The reason for this lack of support has not yet been fully investigated. The aim of this study is to investigate the conditions in which cancer rehabilitation services work and their underpinning mechanisms in South Wales, UK, specifically addressing barriers, facilitators and costs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Realist evaluation, which explains for whom a service works in what circumstances and how through context-mechanism-outcome pattern conjunctions, will be used in three phases to investigate the conditions in which cancer rehabilitation services work and their underpinning mechanisms. Phase 1 will be secondary analysis of a cancer rehabilitation database from a local Health Board to give context to who are accessing rehabilitation. Phase 2 will be thematic analysis of face-to-face, semistructured rehabilitation participant (n=20) and healthcare professional (n=20) interviews to explore the mechanisms of how cancer rehabilitation works. Phase 3 will be two case studies and cost-consequences analysis of cancer rehabilitation services. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study received favourable ethical opinion from London South-East Research Ethics Committee (17/LO/2123) in December 2017. This project is part of the author’s PhD thesis and it is expected that the findings will be disseminated in academic journals and at local and international conferences. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6500344/ /pubmed/31015271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025953 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Csontos, Judit Katalin Fitzsimmons, Deborah Jones, Mari Wilkinson, Wendy M Horton, Joanne Love-Gould, Lisa Tee, Anna Watts, Tessa Realist evaluation of cancer rehabilitation services in South Wales (REEACaRS): a mixed methods study protocol |
title | Realist evaluation of cancer rehabilitation services in South Wales (REEACaRS): a mixed methods study protocol |
title_full | Realist evaluation of cancer rehabilitation services in South Wales (REEACaRS): a mixed methods study protocol |
title_fullStr | Realist evaluation of cancer rehabilitation services in South Wales (REEACaRS): a mixed methods study protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Realist evaluation of cancer rehabilitation services in South Wales (REEACaRS): a mixed methods study protocol |
title_short | Realist evaluation of cancer rehabilitation services in South Wales (REEACaRS): a mixed methods study protocol |
title_sort | realist evaluation of cancer rehabilitation services in south wales (reeacars): a mixed methods study protocol |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500344/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31015271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025953 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT csontosjuditkatalin realistevaluationofcancerrehabilitationservicesinsouthwalesreeacarsamixedmethodsstudyprotocol AT fitzsimmonsdeborah realistevaluationofcancerrehabilitationservicesinsouthwalesreeacarsamixedmethodsstudyprotocol AT jonesmari realistevaluationofcancerrehabilitationservicesinsouthwalesreeacarsamixedmethodsstudyprotocol AT wilkinsonwendym realistevaluationofcancerrehabilitationservicesinsouthwalesreeacarsamixedmethodsstudyprotocol AT hortonjoanne realistevaluationofcancerrehabilitationservicesinsouthwalesreeacarsamixedmethodsstudyprotocol AT lovegouldlisa realistevaluationofcancerrehabilitationservicesinsouthwalesreeacarsamixedmethodsstudyprotocol AT teeanna realistevaluationofcancerrehabilitationservicesinsouthwalesreeacarsamixedmethodsstudyprotocol AT wattstessa realistevaluationofcancerrehabilitationservicesinsouthwalesreeacarsamixedmethodsstudyprotocol |