Cargando…

Realist evaluation of cancer rehabilitation services in South Wales (REEACaRS): a mixed methods study protocol

INTRODUCTION: Long-term and late effects of cancer treatments can cause functional limitations and reduce quality of life. Cancer rehabilitation services, which can comprise physical exercise, psychological support and educational interventions depending on the individual’s needs, have been found to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Csontos, Judit Katalin, Fitzsimmons, Deborah, Jones, Mari, Wilkinson, Wendy M, Horton, Joanne, Love-Gould, Lisa, Tee, Anna, Watts, Tessa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31015271
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025953
_version_ 1783415935243124736
author Csontos, Judit Katalin
Fitzsimmons, Deborah
Jones, Mari
Wilkinson, Wendy M
Horton, Joanne
Love-Gould, Lisa
Tee, Anna
Watts, Tessa
author_facet Csontos, Judit Katalin
Fitzsimmons, Deborah
Jones, Mari
Wilkinson, Wendy M
Horton, Joanne
Love-Gould, Lisa
Tee, Anna
Watts, Tessa
author_sort Csontos, Judit Katalin
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Long-term and late effects of cancer treatments can cause functional limitations and reduce quality of life. Cancer rehabilitation services, which can comprise physical exercise, psychological support and educational interventions depending on the individual’s needs, have been found to have a positive effect on health-related quality of life worldwide. However, accessibility or the lack of awareness on available help can act as barriers and influence the uptake of services, resulting in people having unmet rehabilitation needs. In Wales, UK, 41% of people, who have had health and social care needs resulting from cancer and its treatments, reported that they did not receive care when needed. The reason for this lack of support has not yet been fully investigated. The aim of this study is to investigate the conditions in which cancer rehabilitation services work and their underpinning mechanisms in South Wales, UK, specifically addressing barriers, facilitators and costs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Realist evaluation, which explains for whom a service works in what circumstances and how through context-mechanism-outcome pattern conjunctions, will be used in three phases to investigate the conditions in which cancer rehabilitation services work and their underpinning mechanisms. Phase 1 will be secondary analysis of a cancer rehabilitation database from a local Health Board to give context to who are accessing rehabilitation. Phase 2 will be thematic analysis of face-to-face, semistructured rehabilitation participant (n=20) and healthcare professional (n=20) interviews to explore the mechanisms of how cancer rehabilitation works. Phase 3 will be two case studies and cost-consequences analysis of cancer rehabilitation services. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study received favourable ethical opinion from London South-East Research Ethics Committee (17/LO/2123) in December 2017. This project is part of the author’s PhD thesis and it is expected that the findings will be disseminated in academic journals and at local and international conferences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6500344
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65003442019-05-21 Realist evaluation of cancer rehabilitation services in South Wales (REEACaRS): a mixed methods study protocol Csontos, Judit Katalin Fitzsimmons, Deborah Jones, Mari Wilkinson, Wendy M Horton, Joanne Love-Gould, Lisa Tee, Anna Watts, Tessa BMJ Open Oncology INTRODUCTION: Long-term and late effects of cancer treatments can cause functional limitations and reduce quality of life. Cancer rehabilitation services, which can comprise physical exercise, psychological support and educational interventions depending on the individual’s needs, have been found to have a positive effect on health-related quality of life worldwide. However, accessibility or the lack of awareness on available help can act as barriers and influence the uptake of services, resulting in people having unmet rehabilitation needs. In Wales, UK, 41% of people, who have had health and social care needs resulting from cancer and its treatments, reported that they did not receive care when needed. The reason for this lack of support has not yet been fully investigated. The aim of this study is to investigate the conditions in which cancer rehabilitation services work and their underpinning mechanisms in South Wales, UK, specifically addressing barriers, facilitators and costs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Realist evaluation, which explains for whom a service works in what circumstances and how through context-mechanism-outcome pattern conjunctions, will be used in three phases to investigate the conditions in which cancer rehabilitation services work and their underpinning mechanisms. Phase 1 will be secondary analysis of a cancer rehabilitation database from a local Health Board to give context to who are accessing rehabilitation. Phase 2 will be thematic analysis of face-to-face, semistructured rehabilitation participant (n=20) and healthcare professional (n=20) interviews to explore the mechanisms of how cancer rehabilitation works. Phase 3 will be two case studies and cost-consequences analysis of cancer rehabilitation services. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study received favourable ethical opinion from London South-East Research Ethics Committee (17/LO/2123) in December 2017. This project is part of the author’s PhD thesis and it is expected that the findings will be disseminated in academic journals and at local and international conferences. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6500344/ /pubmed/31015271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025953 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Oncology
Csontos, Judit Katalin
Fitzsimmons, Deborah
Jones, Mari
Wilkinson, Wendy M
Horton, Joanne
Love-Gould, Lisa
Tee, Anna
Watts, Tessa
Realist evaluation of cancer rehabilitation services in South Wales (REEACaRS): a mixed methods study protocol
title Realist evaluation of cancer rehabilitation services in South Wales (REEACaRS): a mixed methods study protocol
title_full Realist evaluation of cancer rehabilitation services in South Wales (REEACaRS): a mixed methods study protocol
title_fullStr Realist evaluation of cancer rehabilitation services in South Wales (REEACaRS): a mixed methods study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Realist evaluation of cancer rehabilitation services in South Wales (REEACaRS): a mixed methods study protocol
title_short Realist evaluation of cancer rehabilitation services in South Wales (REEACaRS): a mixed methods study protocol
title_sort realist evaluation of cancer rehabilitation services in south wales (reeacars): a mixed methods study protocol
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31015271
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025953
work_keys_str_mv AT csontosjuditkatalin realistevaluationofcancerrehabilitationservicesinsouthwalesreeacarsamixedmethodsstudyprotocol
AT fitzsimmonsdeborah realistevaluationofcancerrehabilitationservicesinsouthwalesreeacarsamixedmethodsstudyprotocol
AT jonesmari realistevaluationofcancerrehabilitationservicesinsouthwalesreeacarsamixedmethodsstudyprotocol
AT wilkinsonwendym realistevaluationofcancerrehabilitationservicesinsouthwalesreeacarsamixedmethodsstudyprotocol
AT hortonjoanne realistevaluationofcancerrehabilitationservicesinsouthwalesreeacarsamixedmethodsstudyprotocol
AT lovegouldlisa realistevaluationofcancerrehabilitationservicesinsouthwalesreeacarsamixedmethodsstudyprotocol
AT teeanna realistevaluationofcancerrehabilitationservicesinsouthwalesreeacarsamixedmethodsstudyprotocol
AT wattstessa realistevaluationofcancerrehabilitationservicesinsouthwalesreeacarsamixedmethodsstudyprotocol