Cargando…

Comparative efficacy and safety of surgical and invasive treatments for adults with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: protocol for a network meta-analysis and systematic review

INTRODUCTION: Surgical and invasive procedures are widely used in adults with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis when conservative treatments fail. However, little is known about the comparative efficacy and safety of these interventions. To address this, we will perform a network meta-analysis (NM...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Lingxiao, H Ferreira, Paulo, R Beckenkamp, Paula, L Ferreira, Manuela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30948574
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024752
_version_ 1783415940617076736
author Chen, Lingxiao
H Ferreira, Paulo
R Beckenkamp, Paula
L Ferreira, Manuela
author_facet Chen, Lingxiao
H Ferreira, Paulo
R Beckenkamp, Paula
L Ferreira, Manuela
author_sort Chen, Lingxiao
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Surgical and invasive procedures are widely used in adults with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis when conservative treatments fail. However, little is known about the comparative efficacy and safety of these interventions. To address this, we will perform a network meta-analysis (NMA) and systematic review to compare the efficacy and safety of surgical and invasive procedures for adults with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will include randomised controlled trials assessing surgical and invasive treatments for adults with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. We will search AMED, CINAHL, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and MEDLINE. Only English studies will be included and no restriction will be set for publication status. For efficacy, our primary outcome will be physical function. Secondary outcomes will include pain intensity, health-related quality of life, global impression of recovery, work absenteeism and mobility. For safety, our primary outcome will be all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes will include adverse events (number of events or number of people with an event) and treatment withdrawal due to adverse effect. Two reviewers will independently select studies, extract data and assess the risk of bias (Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials) of included studies. The quality of the evidence will be evaluated through the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework. Random-effects NMA will be performed to combine all the evidence under the frequentist framework and the ranking results will be presented through the surface under the cumulative ranking curve and mean rank. All analyses will be performed in Stata and R. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical approval is required. The research will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018094180.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6500367
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65003672019-05-21 Comparative efficacy and safety of surgical and invasive treatments for adults with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: protocol for a network meta-analysis and systematic review Chen, Lingxiao H Ferreira, Paulo R Beckenkamp, Paula L Ferreira, Manuela BMJ Open Surgery INTRODUCTION: Surgical and invasive procedures are widely used in adults with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis when conservative treatments fail. However, little is known about the comparative efficacy and safety of these interventions. To address this, we will perform a network meta-analysis (NMA) and systematic review to compare the efficacy and safety of surgical and invasive procedures for adults with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will include randomised controlled trials assessing surgical and invasive treatments for adults with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. We will search AMED, CINAHL, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and MEDLINE. Only English studies will be included and no restriction will be set for publication status. For efficacy, our primary outcome will be physical function. Secondary outcomes will include pain intensity, health-related quality of life, global impression of recovery, work absenteeism and mobility. For safety, our primary outcome will be all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes will include adverse events (number of events or number of people with an event) and treatment withdrawal due to adverse effect. Two reviewers will independently select studies, extract data and assess the risk of bias (Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials) of included studies. The quality of the evidence will be evaluated through the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework. Random-effects NMA will be performed to combine all the evidence under the frequentist framework and the ranking results will be presented through the surface under the cumulative ranking curve and mean rank. All analyses will be performed in Stata and R. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical approval is required. The research will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018094180. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6500367/ /pubmed/30948574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024752 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Surgery
Chen, Lingxiao
H Ferreira, Paulo
R Beckenkamp, Paula
L Ferreira, Manuela
Comparative efficacy and safety of surgical and invasive treatments for adults with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: protocol for a network meta-analysis and systematic review
title Comparative efficacy and safety of surgical and invasive treatments for adults with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: protocol for a network meta-analysis and systematic review
title_full Comparative efficacy and safety of surgical and invasive treatments for adults with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: protocol for a network meta-analysis and systematic review
title_fullStr Comparative efficacy and safety of surgical and invasive treatments for adults with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: protocol for a network meta-analysis and systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Comparative efficacy and safety of surgical and invasive treatments for adults with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: protocol for a network meta-analysis and systematic review
title_short Comparative efficacy and safety of surgical and invasive treatments for adults with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: protocol for a network meta-analysis and systematic review
title_sort comparative efficacy and safety of surgical and invasive treatments for adults with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: protocol for a network meta-analysis and systematic review
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30948574
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024752
work_keys_str_mv AT chenlingxiao comparativeefficacyandsafetyofsurgicalandinvasivetreatmentsforadultswithdegenerativelumbarspinalstenosisprotocolforanetworkmetaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT hferreirapaulo comparativeefficacyandsafetyofsurgicalandinvasivetreatmentsforadultswithdegenerativelumbarspinalstenosisprotocolforanetworkmetaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT rbeckenkamppaula comparativeefficacyandsafetyofsurgicalandinvasivetreatmentsforadultswithdegenerativelumbarspinalstenosisprotocolforanetworkmetaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT lferreiramanuela comparativeefficacyandsafetyofsurgicalandinvasivetreatmentsforadultswithdegenerativelumbarspinalstenosisprotocolforanetworkmetaanalysisandsystematicreview