Cargando…
Comparative efficacy and safety of surgical and invasive treatments for adults with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: protocol for a network meta-analysis and systematic review
INTRODUCTION: Surgical and invasive procedures are widely used in adults with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis when conservative treatments fail. However, little is known about the comparative efficacy and safety of these interventions. To address this, we will perform a network meta-analysis (NM...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500367/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30948574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024752 |
_version_ | 1783415940617076736 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Lingxiao H Ferreira, Paulo R Beckenkamp, Paula L Ferreira, Manuela |
author_facet | Chen, Lingxiao H Ferreira, Paulo R Beckenkamp, Paula L Ferreira, Manuela |
author_sort | Chen, Lingxiao |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Surgical and invasive procedures are widely used in adults with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis when conservative treatments fail. However, little is known about the comparative efficacy and safety of these interventions. To address this, we will perform a network meta-analysis (NMA) and systematic review to compare the efficacy and safety of surgical and invasive procedures for adults with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will include randomised controlled trials assessing surgical and invasive treatments for adults with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. We will search AMED, CINAHL, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and MEDLINE. Only English studies will be included and no restriction will be set for publication status. For efficacy, our primary outcome will be physical function. Secondary outcomes will include pain intensity, health-related quality of life, global impression of recovery, work absenteeism and mobility. For safety, our primary outcome will be all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes will include adverse events (number of events or number of people with an event) and treatment withdrawal due to adverse effect. Two reviewers will independently select studies, extract data and assess the risk of bias (Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials) of included studies. The quality of the evidence will be evaluated through the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework. Random-effects NMA will be performed to combine all the evidence under the frequentist framework and the ranking results will be presented through the surface under the cumulative ranking curve and mean rank. All analyses will be performed in Stata and R. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical approval is required. The research will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018094180. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6500367 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65003672019-05-21 Comparative efficacy and safety of surgical and invasive treatments for adults with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: protocol for a network meta-analysis and systematic review Chen, Lingxiao H Ferreira, Paulo R Beckenkamp, Paula L Ferreira, Manuela BMJ Open Surgery INTRODUCTION: Surgical and invasive procedures are widely used in adults with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis when conservative treatments fail. However, little is known about the comparative efficacy and safety of these interventions. To address this, we will perform a network meta-analysis (NMA) and systematic review to compare the efficacy and safety of surgical and invasive procedures for adults with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will include randomised controlled trials assessing surgical and invasive treatments for adults with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. We will search AMED, CINAHL, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and MEDLINE. Only English studies will be included and no restriction will be set for publication status. For efficacy, our primary outcome will be physical function. Secondary outcomes will include pain intensity, health-related quality of life, global impression of recovery, work absenteeism and mobility. For safety, our primary outcome will be all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes will include adverse events (number of events or number of people with an event) and treatment withdrawal due to adverse effect. Two reviewers will independently select studies, extract data and assess the risk of bias (Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials) of included studies. The quality of the evidence will be evaluated through the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework. Random-effects NMA will be performed to combine all the evidence under the frequentist framework and the ranking results will be presented through the surface under the cumulative ranking curve and mean rank. All analyses will be performed in Stata and R. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical approval is required. The research will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018094180. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6500367/ /pubmed/30948574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024752 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Surgery Chen, Lingxiao H Ferreira, Paulo R Beckenkamp, Paula L Ferreira, Manuela Comparative efficacy and safety of surgical and invasive treatments for adults with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: protocol for a network meta-analysis and systematic review |
title | Comparative efficacy and safety of surgical and invasive treatments for adults with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: protocol for a network meta-analysis and systematic review |
title_full | Comparative efficacy and safety of surgical and invasive treatments for adults with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: protocol for a network meta-analysis and systematic review |
title_fullStr | Comparative efficacy and safety of surgical and invasive treatments for adults with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: protocol for a network meta-analysis and systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative efficacy and safety of surgical and invasive treatments for adults with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: protocol for a network meta-analysis and systematic review |
title_short | Comparative efficacy and safety of surgical and invasive treatments for adults with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: protocol for a network meta-analysis and systematic review |
title_sort | comparative efficacy and safety of surgical and invasive treatments for adults with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: protocol for a network meta-analysis and systematic review |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500367/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30948574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024752 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenlingxiao comparativeefficacyandsafetyofsurgicalandinvasivetreatmentsforadultswithdegenerativelumbarspinalstenosisprotocolforanetworkmetaanalysisandsystematicreview AT hferreirapaulo comparativeefficacyandsafetyofsurgicalandinvasivetreatmentsforadultswithdegenerativelumbarspinalstenosisprotocolforanetworkmetaanalysisandsystematicreview AT rbeckenkamppaula comparativeefficacyandsafetyofsurgicalandinvasivetreatmentsforadultswithdegenerativelumbarspinalstenosisprotocolforanetworkmetaanalysisandsystematicreview AT lferreiramanuela comparativeefficacyandsafetyofsurgicalandinvasivetreatmentsforadultswithdegenerativelumbarspinalstenosisprotocolforanetworkmetaanalysisandsystematicreview |