Cargando…

Disagreements in risk of bias assessment for randomised controlled trials included in more than one Cochrane systematic reviews: a research on research study using cross-sectional design

OBJECTIVES: Assess the frequency and reasons for disagreements in risk of bias assessments for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) included in more than one Cochrane review. DESIGN: Research on research study, using cross-sectional design. DATA SOURCES: 2796 Cochrane reviews published between March...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Bertizzolo, Lorenzo, Bossuyt, Patrick, Atal, Ignacio, Ravaud, Philippe, Dechartres, Agnes
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:	Epidemiology
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500379/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30940766 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028382

Ejemplares similares

Assessing bias in osteoarthritis trials included in Cochrane reviews: protocol for a meta-epidemiological study
por: Hansen, Julie B, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Avoidable waste of research related to outcome planning and reporting in clinical trials
por: Yordanov, Youri, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Association between trial registration and treatment effect estimates: a meta-epidemiological study
por: Dechartres, Agnès, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Better prioritization to increase research value and decrease waste
por: Dechartres, Agnes, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Evidence for non-communicable diseases: analysis of Cochrane reviews and randomised trials by World Bank classification
por: Heneghan, C, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Reporting of statistically significant results at ClinicalTrials.gov for completed superiority randomized controlled trials
por: Dechartres, Agnes, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Information-based measure of disagreement for more than two observers: a useful tool to compare the degree of observer disagreement
por: Henriques, Teresa, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Scaling and Disagreements: Bias, Noise, and Ambiguity
por: Uma, Alexandra, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Are more observational studies being included in Cochrane Reviews?
por: Kongsted, Hans Christian, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Partisan conflict over content moderation is more than disagreement about facts
por: Appel, Ruth E., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Consistency of causal claims in observational studies: a review of papers published in a general medical journal
por: Olarte Parra, Camila, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Managing Disagreement: A Defense of “Regime Bias”
por: Sabl, Andrew
Publicado: (2010)

The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
por: Higgins, Julian P T, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Is publication bias present in gastroenterological research? An analysis of abstracts presented at an annual congress
por: Meyer, Chase, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Meta-analyses including non-randomized studies of therapeutic interventions: a methodological review
por: Faber, Timor, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

The judgement of biases included in the category “other bias” in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: a systematic survey
por: Babic, Andrija, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Avoidable waste of research related to inadequate methods in clinical trials
por: Yordanov, Youri, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Biased under-reporting of research reflects biased under-submission more than biased editorial rejection
por: Chalmers, Iain, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Reporting of sample size calculation in randomised controlled trials: review
por: Charles, Pierre, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Randomised study shows that repeated self-sampling and HPV test has more than two-fold higher detection rate of women with CIN2+ histology than Pap smear cytology
por: Gustavsson, Inger, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Translating Cochrane Reviews to Ensure that Healthcare Decision-Making is Informed by High-Quality Research Evidence
por: von Elm, Erik, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Quality Assessment of Studies Included in Cochrane Oral Health Systematic Reviews: A Meta-Research
por: Sofi-Mahmudi, Ahmad, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Cochrane: the unfinished symphony of research synthesis
por: Roberts, Ian, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Biases in parasite biodiversity research: why some helminth species attract more research than others
por: Poulin, Robert, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Which patients are not included in the English Cancer Waiting Times monitoring dataset, 2009–2013? Implications for use of the data in research
por: Di Girolamo, C, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Ethical, anticipatory genomics research on human behavior means celebrating disagreement
por: Martschenko, Daphne Oluwaseun, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Deep Disagreement (Part 2): Epistemology of Deep Disagreement
por: Ranalli, Chris, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Deep Disagreement (Part 1): Theories of Deep Disagreement
por: Ranalli, Chris, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Evaluating the impact of including non-randomised studies of interventions in meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials: a protocol for a meta-epidemiological study
por: Yao, Minghong, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Usefulness of applying research reporting guidelines as Writing Aid software: a crossover randomised controlled trial
por: Hawwash, Dana, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Preventing Bias in Cluster Randomised Trials
por: Giraudeau, Bruno, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Is omission of free text records a possible source of data loss and bias in Clinical Practice Research Datalink studies? A case–control study
por: Price, Sarah J, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration
por: Turner, Lucy, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Epidemiology and transmission of hepatitis A in Shaanxi (western China) after more than ten years of universal vaccination
por: Hu, Xiaotong, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Patient-important outcomes in systematic reviews: Poor quality of evidence
por: Yordanov, Youri, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Disagreement, Certainties, Relativism
por: Kusch, Martin
Publicado: (2018)

Rationally irresolvable disagreement
por: Melchior, Guido
Publicado: (2023)

Randomised Controlled Trials: The Cochrane Collaboration
por: Herxheimer, Andrew
Publicado: (1993)

Exclusion of patients with concomitant chronic conditions in ongoing randomised controlled trials targeting 10 common chronic conditions and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: a systematic review of registration details
por: Buffel du Vaure, Céline, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Most Cochrane systematic reviews and protocols did not adhere to the Cochrane's risk of bias 2.0 tool
por: Martimbianco, Ana Luiza Cabrera, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_rfqc2gj499t5jjlu1qfsq1iap3