Cargando…

DNA extraction from FFPE tissue samples – a comparison of three procedures

AIM OF THE STUDY: One of the critical steps in molecular oncology diagnostics is obtaining high quality genomic DNA. Therefore, it is important to evaluate and compare the techniques used to extract DNA from tissue samples. Since formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues are routinely used fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sarnecka, Agnieszka K., Nawrat, Dominika, Piwowar, Monika, Ligęza, Janusz, Swadźba, Jakub, Wójcik, Piotr
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31061638
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wo.2019.83875
_version_ 1783415944757903360
author Sarnecka, Agnieszka K.
Nawrat, Dominika
Piwowar, Monika
Ligęza, Janusz
Swadźba, Jakub
Wójcik, Piotr
author_facet Sarnecka, Agnieszka K.
Nawrat, Dominika
Piwowar, Monika
Ligęza, Janusz
Swadźba, Jakub
Wójcik, Piotr
author_sort Sarnecka, Agnieszka K.
collection PubMed
description AIM OF THE STUDY: One of the critical steps in molecular oncology diagnostics is obtaining high quality genomic DNA. Therefore, it is important to evaluate and compare the techniques used to extract DNA from tissue samples. Since formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues are routinely used for both retrospective and prospective studies, we compared three commercially available methods of nucleic acid extraction in terms of quantity and quality of isolated DNA. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Slides prepared from 42 FFPE blocks were macro-dissected. Resulting material was divided and processed simultaneously using three extraction kits: QIAamp DNA FFPE Tissue Kit (QIAGEN), Cobas DNA Sample Preparation Kit (Roche Molecular Systems) and Maxwell 16 FFPE Plus LEV DNA Purification Kit (Promega). Subsequently, quantity and quality of obtained DNA samples were analysed spectrophotometrically (NanoDrop 2000, Thermo Scientific). Results of quantitative analysis were confirmed by a fluorometric procedure (Qubit 3.0 Fluorometer, Life Technologies). RESULTS: The results demonstrated that the yields of total DNA extracted using either Maxwell or Cobas methods were significantly higher compared to the QIAamp method (p < 0.001). The Maxwell Extraction Kit delivered DNA samples of the highest quality (p < 0.01). However, the highest total yield of extracted DNA was achieved with the Cobas technique, which may be due to a higher volume of eluate compared to the Maxwell method. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first paper which directly compares three extraction methods: Cobas, Maxwell and QIAamp. The data herein provide information required for the selection of a protocol that best suits the needs of the overall study design in terms of the quantity and quality of the extracted DNA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6500389
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65003892019-05-06 DNA extraction from FFPE tissue samples – a comparison of three procedures Sarnecka, Agnieszka K. Nawrat, Dominika Piwowar, Monika Ligęza, Janusz Swadźba, Jakub Wójcik, Piotr Contemp Oncol (Pozn) Original Paper AIM OF THE STUDY: One of the critical steps in molecular oncology diagnostics is obtaining high quality genomic DNA. Therefore, it is important to evaluate and compare the techniques used to extract DNA from tissue samples. Since formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues are routinely used for both retrospective and prospective studies, we compared three commercially available methods of nucleic acid extraction in terms of quantity and quality of isolated DNA. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Slides prepared from 42 FFPE blocks were macro-dissected. Resulting material was divided and processed simultaneously using three extraction kits: QIAamp DNA FFPE Tissue Kit (QIAGEN), Cobas DNA Sample Preparation Kit (Roche Molecular Systems) and Maxwell 16 FFPE Plus LEV DNA Purification Kit (Promega). Subsequently, quantity and quality of obtained DNA samples were analysed spectrophotometrically (NanoDrop 2000, Thermo Scientific). Results of quantitative analysis were confirmed by a fluorometric procedure (Qubit 3.0 Fluorometer, Life Technologies). RESULTS: The results demonstrated that the yields of total DNA extracted using either Maxwell or Cobas methods were significantly higher compared to the QIAamp method (p < 0.001). The Maxwell Extraction Kit delivered DNA samples of the highest quality (p < 0.01). However, the highest total yield of extracted DNA was achieved with the Cobas technique, which may be due to a higher volume of eluate compared to the Maxwell method. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first paper which directly compares three extraction methods: Cobas, Maxwell and QIAamp. The data herein provide information required for the selection of a protocol that best suits the needs of the overall study design in terms of the quantity and quality of the extracted DNA. Termedia Publishing House 2019-03-26 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6500389/ /pubmed/31061638 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wo.2019.83875 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Termedia Sp. z o. o. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Sarnecka, Agnieszka K.
Nawrat, Dominika
Piwowar, Monika
Ligęza, Janusz
Swadźba, Jakub
Wójcik, Piotr
DNA extraction from FFPE tissue samples – a comparison of three procedures
title DNA extraction from FFPE tissue samples – a comparison of three procedures
title_full DNA extraction from FFPE tissue samples – a comparison of three procedures
title_fullStr DNA extraction from FFPE tissue samples – a comparison of three procedures
title_full_unstemmed DNA extraction from FFPE tissue samples – a comparison of three procedures
title_short DNA extraction from FFPE tissue samples – a comparison of three procedures
title_sort dna extraction from ffpe tissue samples – a comparison of three procedures
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31061638
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wo.2019.83875
work_keys_str_mv AT sarneckaagnieszkak dnaextractionfromffpetissuesamplesacomparisonofthreeprocedures
AT nawratdominika dnaextractionfromffpetissuesamplesacomparisonofthreeprocedures
AT piwowarmonika dnaextractionfromffpetissuesamplesacomparisonofthreeprocedures
AT ligezajanusz dnaextractionfromffpetissuesamplesacomparisonofthreeprocedures
AT swadzbajakub dnaextractionfromffpetissuesamplesacomparisonofthreeprocedures
AT wojcikpiotr dnaextractionfromffpetissuesamplesacomparisonofthreeprocedures