Cargando…

Utilization of computerized clinical decision support for potentially inappropriate medications

Background: Electronic medical record (EMR) alerts may inform point of care decisions, including the decision to prescribe potentially inappropriate medications (PIM) identified in the Beers criteria. EMR alerts may not be considered relevant or informative in the clinician context, leading to a phe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alagiakrishnan, K, Ballermann, M, Rolfson, D, Mohindra, K, Sadowski, CA, Ausford, A, Romney, J, Hayward, RS
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31118596
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S192927
_version_ 1783415953014390784
author Alagiakrishnan, K
Ballermann, M
Rolfson, D
Mohindra, K
Sadowski, CA
Ausford, A
Romney, J
Hayward, RS
author_facet Alagiakrishnan, K
Ballermann, M
Rolfson, D
Mohindra, K
Sadowski, CA
Ausford, A
Romney, J
Hayward, RS
author_sort Alagiakrishnan, K
collection PubMed
description Background: Electronic medical record (EMR) alerts may inform point of care decisions, including the decision to prescribe potentially inappropriate medications (PIM) identified in the Beers criteria. EMR alerts may not be considered relevant or informative in the clinician context, leading to a phenomenon colloquially known as “alert fatigue.” Objective: To assess the frequency of clinical interaction with EMR alerts and associated deprescribing behaviors in ambulatory settings. Methods: This is a retrospective observational study in two ambulatory clinics (the Kaye Edmonton Clinic Senior’s Clinic and the Lynnwood Family Practice Clinic) in Edmonton over an observational period of 30 months. Statistical analysis was done using descriptive statistics, chi-square and regression analysis. Results: The reminder performance for interactions with the alert was 17.2% across the two clinics. The Number Needed to Remind (NNR) or mean number of alerts shown on clinician screens prior to a single interaction of any kind with the alert was 5.8. When actions were defined as a deprescribing (ie discontinuation) event that was related to the alert and that particular interaction in the EMR, the reminder performance was 1.2%, for an NNR of 82.8. Conclusion: The configuration of alerts in the EMR was not associated with a clinically detectable increase in the uptake of the Beers criteria for high hazard medications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6500432
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65004322019-05-22 Utilization of computerized clinical decision support for potentially inappropriate medications Alagiakrishnan, K Ballermann, M Rolfson, D Mohindra, K Sadowski, CA Ausford, A Romney, J Hayward, RS Clin Interv Aging Original Research Background: Electronic medical record (EMR) alerts may inform point of care decisions, including the decision to prescribe potentially inappropriate medications (PIM) identified in the Beers criteria. EMR alerts may not be considered relevant or informative in the clinician context, leading to a phenomenon colloquially known as “alert fatigue.” Objective: To assess the frequency of clinical interaction with EMR alerts and associated deprescribing behaviors in ambulatory settings. Methods: This is a retrospective observational study in two ambulatory clinics (the Kaye Edmonton Clinic Senior’s Clinic and the Lynnwood Family Practice Clinic) in Edmonton over an observational period of 30 months. Statistical analysis was done using descriptive statistics, chi-square and regression analysis. Results: The reminder performance for interactions with the alert was 17.2% across the two clinics. The Number Needed to Remind (NNR) or mean number of alerts shown on clinician screens prior to a single interaction of any kind with the alert was 5.8. When actions were defined as a deprescribing (ie discontinuation) event that was related to the alert and that particular interaction in the EMR, the reminder performance was 1.2%, for an NNR of 82.8. Conclusion: The configuration of alerts in the EMR was not associated with a clinically detectable increase in the uptake of the Beers criteria for high hazard medications. Dove 2019-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6500432/ /pubmed/31118596 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S192927 Text en © 2019 Alagiakrishnan et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Alagiakrishnan, K
Ballermann, M
Rolfson, D
Mohindra, K
Sadowski, CA
Ausford, A
Romney, J
Hayward, RS
Utilization of computerized clinical decision support for potentially inappropriate medications
title Utilization of computerized clinical decision support for potentially inappropriate medications
title_full Utilization of computerized clinical decision support for potentially inappropriate medications
title_fullStr Utilization of computerized clinical decision support for potentially inappropriate medications
title_full_unstemmed Utilization of computerized clinical decision support for potentially inappropriate medications
title_short Utilization of computerized clinical decision support for potentially inappropriate medications
title_sort utilization of computerized clinical decision support for potentially inappropriate medications
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31118596
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S192927
work_keys_str_mv AT alagiakrishnank utilizationofcomputerizedclinicaldecisionsupportforpotentiallyinappropriatemedications
AT ballermannm utilizationofcomputerizedclinicaldecisionsupportforpotentiallyinappropriatemedications
AT rolfsond utilizationofcomputerizedclinicaldecisionsupportforpotentiallyinappropriatemedications
AT mohindrak utilizationofcomputerizedclinicaldecisionsupportforpotentiallyinappropriatemedications
AT sadowskica utilizationofcomputerizedclinicaldecisionsupportforpotentiallyinappropriatemedications
AT ausforda utilizationofcomputerizedclinicaldecisionsupportforpotentiallyinappropriatemedications
AT romneyj utilizationofcomputerizedclinicaldecisionsupportforpotentiallyinappropriatemedications
AT haywardrs utilizationofcomputerizedclinicaldecisionsupportforpotentiallyinappropriatemedications