Comparison of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine versus Esmolol for Attenuation of Hemodynamic Response to Tracheal Intubation after Rapid Sequence Induction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The present study aims to investigate whether intravenous dexmedetomidine shows superiority to esmolol for hemodynamic response to tracheal intubation after rapid sequence induction. In the present meta-analysis, PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for trials comparing dexmedetomi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Zhao, Xu, Li, Zheng, Jinwei, Wang, Qingxiu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2019
Materias:
Review Article
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31139645
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/6791971
_version_ 1783416000941654016
author Li, Zhao
Xu, Li
Zheng, Jinwei
Wang, Qingxiu
author_facet Li, Zhao
Xu, Li
Zheng, Jinwei
Wang, Qingxiu
author_sort Li, Zhao
collection PubMed
description The present study aims to investigate whether intravenous dexmedetomidine shows superiority to esmolol for hemodynamic response to tracheal intubation after rapid sequence induction. In the present meta-analysis, PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for trials comparing dexmedetomidine with esmolol for the attenuation of the hemodynamic response to intubation. Ten trials were selected in the present meta-analysis. Compared to esmolol, the use of dexmedetomidine maintains stable heart rates (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) at 1 min, 3 min, and 5 min after tracheal intubation. Dexmedetomidine causes less hemodynamic response to tracheal intubation after rapid sequence induction compared with esmolol.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6500701
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65007012019-05-28 Comparison of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine versus Esmolol for Attenuation of Hemodynamic Response to Tracheal Intubation after Rapid Sequence Induction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Li, Zhao Xu, Li Zheng, Jinwei Wang, Qingxiu Biomed Res Int Review Article The present study aims to investigate whether intravenous dexmedetomidine shows superiority to esmolol for hemodynamic response to tracheal intubation after rapid sequence induction. In the present meta-analysis, PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for trials comparing dexmedetomidine with esmolol for the attenuation of the hemodynamic response to intubation. Ten trials were selected in the present meta-analysis. Compared to esmolol, the use of dexmedetomidine maintains stable heart rates (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) at 1 min, 3 min, and 5 min after tracheal intubation. Dexmedetomidine causes less hemodynamic response to tracheal intubation after rapid sequence induction compared with esmolol. Hindawi 2019-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6500701/ /pubmed/31139645 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/6791971 Text en Copyright © 2019 Zhao Li et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Li, Zhao
Xu, Li
Zheng, Jinwei
Wang, Qingxiu
Comparison of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine versus Esmolol for Attenuation of Hemodynamic Response to Tracheal Intubation after Rapid Sequence Induction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Comparison of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine versus Esmolol for Attenuation of Hemodynamic Response to Tracheal Intubation after Rapid Sequence Induction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Comparison of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine versus Esmolol for Attenuation of Hemodynamic Response to Tracheal Intubation after Rapid Sequence Induction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine versus Esmolol for Attenuation of Hemodynamic Response to Tracheal Intubation after Rapid Sequence Induction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine versus Esmolol for Attenuation of Hemodynamic Response to Tracheal Intubation after Rapid Sequence Induction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Comparison of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine versus Esmolol for Attenuation of Hemodynamic Response to Tracheal Intubation after Rapid Sequence Induction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort comparison of intravenous dexmedetomidine versus esmolol for attenuation of hemodynamic response to tracheal intubation after rapid sequence induction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31139645
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/6791971
work_keys_str_mv AT lizhao comparisonofintravenousdexmedetomidineversusesmololforattenuationofhemodynamicresponsetotrachealintubationafterrapidsequenceinductionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xuli comparisonofintravenousdexmedetomidineversusesmololforattenuationofhemodynamicresponsetotrachealintubationafterrapidsequenceinductionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhengjinwei comparisonofintravenousdexmedetomidineversusesmololforattenuationofhemodynamicresponsetotrachealintubationafterrapidsequenceinductionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangqingxiu comparisonofintravenousdexmedetomidineversusesmololforattenuationofhemodynamicresponsetotrachealintubationafterrapidsequenceinductionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis

Ejemplares similares