Cargando…

Sample size calculation for small sample single-arm trials for time-to-event data: Logrank test with normal approximation or test statistic based on exact chi-square distribution?

BACKGROUND: Sample size calculations are critical to the planning of a clinical trial. For single-arm trials with time-to-event endpoint, standard software provides only limited options. The most popular option is the log-rank test. A second option assuming exponential distribution is available on s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Phadnis, Milind A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31080909
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100360
_version_ 1783416033272397824
author Phadnis, Milind A.
author_facet Phadnis, Milind A.
author_sort Phadnis, Milind A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sample size calculations are critical to the planning of a clinical trial. For single-arm trials with time-to-event endpoint, standard software provides only limited options. The most popular option is the log-rank test. A second option assuming exponential distribution is available on some online websites. Both these approaches rely on asymptotic normality for the test statistic and perform well for moderate-to-large sample sizes. METHODS: As many new treatments in the field of oncology are cost-prohibitive and have slow accrual rates, researchers are often faced with the restriction of conducting single arm trials with potentially small-to-moderate sample sizes. As a practical solution, therefore, we consider the option of performing the sample size calculations using an exact parametric test with the test statistic following a chi-square distribution. Analytic results of sample size calculations from the two methods with Weibull distributed survival times are briefly compared using an example of a clinical trial on cholangiocarcinoma and are verified through simulations. RESULTS: Our simulations suggest that in the case of small sample phase II studies, there can be some practical benefits in using the exact test that could affect the feasibility, timeliness, financial support, and ‘clinical novelty’ factor in conducting a study. The exact test is a good option for designing small-to-moderate sample trials when accrual and follow-up time are adequate. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our simulations for small sample studies, we conclude that a statistician should assess sensitivity of his calculations obtained through different methods before recommending a sample size to their collaborators.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6500916
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65009162019-05-10 Sample size calculation for small sample single-arm trials for time-to-event data: Logrank test with normal approximation or test statistic based on exact chi-square distribution? Phadnis, Milind A. Contemp Clin Trials Commun Article BACKGROUND: Sample size calculations are critical to the planning of a clinical trial. For single-arm trials with time-to-event endpoint, standard software provides only limited options. The most popular option is the log-rank test. A second option assuming exponential distribution is available on some online websites. Both these approaches rely on asymptotic normality for the test statistic and perform well for moderate-to-large sample sizes. METHODS: As many new treatments in the field of oncology are cost-prohibitive and have slow accrual rates, researchers are often faced with the restriction of conducting single arm trials with potentially small-to-moderate sample sizes. As a practical solution, therefore, we consider the option of performing the sample size calculations using an exact parametric test with the test statistic following a chi-square distribution. Analytic results of sample size calculations from the two methods with Weibull distributed survival times are briefly compared using an example of a clinical trial on cholangiocarcinoma and are verified through simulations. RESULTS: Our simulations suggest that in the case of small sample phase II studies, there can be some practical benefits in using the exact test that could affect the feasibility, timeliness, financial support, and ‘clinical novelty’ factor in conducting a study. The exact test is a good option for designing small-to-moderate sample trials when accrual and follow-up time are adequate. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our simulations for small sample studies, we conclude that a statistician should assess sensitivity of his calculations obtained through different methods before recommending a sample size to their collaborators. Elsevier 2019-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6500916/ /pubmed/31080909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100360 Text en © 2019 The Author http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Phadnis, Milind A.
Sample size calculation for small sample single-arm trials for time-to-event data: Logrank test with normal approximation or test statistic based on exact chi-square distribution?
title Sample size calculation for small sample single-arm trials for time-to-event data: Logrank test with normal approximation or test statistic based on exact chi-square distribution?
title_full Sample size calculation for small sample single-arm trials for time-to-event data: Logrank test with normal approximation or test statistic based on exact chi-square distribution?
title_fullStr Sample size calculation for small sample single-arm trials for time-to-event data: Logrank test with normal approximation or test statistic based on exact chi-square distribution?
title_full_unstemmed Sample size calculation for small sample single-arm trials for time-to-event data: Logrank test with normal approximation or test statistic based on exact chi-square distribution?
title_short Sample size calculation for small sample single-arm trials for time-to-event data: Logrank test with normal approximation or test statistic based on exact chi-square distribution?
title_sort sample size calculation for small sample single-arm trials for time-to-event data: logrank test with normal approximation or test statistic based on exact chi-square distribution?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31080909
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100360
work_keys_str_mv AT phadnismilinda samplesizecalculationforsmallsamplesinglearmtrialsfortimetoeventdatalogranktestwithnormalapproximationorteststatisticbasedonexactchisquaredistribution