Cargando…

Patient reported outcome measures for use in pregnancy and childbirth: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Globally, an increasing number of women give birth in a healthcare facility. Improvement in the quality of care is crucial if preventable maternal mortality and morbidity are to be reduced. A Patient Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) can be used to measure quality of care and provide new i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dickinson, Fiona, McCauley, Mary, Smith, Helen, van den Broek, Nynke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6501313/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31060519
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2318-3
_version_ 1783416092799008768
author Dickinson, Fiona
McCauley, Mary
Smith, Helen
van den Broek, Nynke
author_facet Dickinson, Fiona
McCauley, Mary
Smith, Helen
van den Broek, Nynke
author_sort Dickinson, Fiona
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Globally, an increasing number of women give birth in a healthcare facility. Improvement in the quality of care is crucial if preventable maternal mortality and morbidity are to be reduced. A Patient Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) can be used to measure quality of care and provide new information on the impact that treatment or interventions have on patient’s self-assessed health and health-related quality of life. We conducted a systematic review to identify which condition-specific PROMs are currently available for use in pregnancy and childbirth, and to evaluate whether these could potentially be used to assess the quality of care provided for women using maternity services. METHODS: We searched for articles relating to the use of PROMs related to care during pregnancy, childbirth, the postnatal period and women’s health more generally using PsycINFO, CINAHL, Medline and Web of Science databases as well as “grey literature”, with no date limit. Any PROM identified was reviewed with regards to development, use, and potential applicability to assess quality of maternity care provision. A narrative synthesis was used to summarise findings. RESULTS: Six papers were identified; two related to aspects of pregnancy (hyperemesis gravidarum and gestational diabetes), and four related to childbirth and the postnatal period (obstetric haemorrhage and postnatal depression). Within these papers, a total of 14 different tools were identified, which assessed a variety of aspects of physical, psychological and social health, or were generic tools, not specific to childbirth. One PROM addressed childbirth generally, however, it did not ask for or provide specific outcome measures but required women to identify and then assess what they considered the most important areas in their life affected by childbirth. CONCLUSIONS: To date, there is no PROM agreed which would be suitable as patient reported outcome measure for the assessment of the quality of care women receive during pregnancy or after childbirth. However, there are a variety of available assessment tools which could potentially be helpful in developing new and existing PROMs for maternity care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6501313
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65013132019-05-10 Patient reported outcome measures for use in pregnancy and childbirth: a systematic review Dickinson, Fiona McCauley, Mary Smith, Helen van den Broek, Nynke BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Globally, an increasing number of women give birth in a healthcare facility. Improvement in the quality of care is crucial if preventable maternal mortality and morbidity are to be reduced. A Patient Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) can be used to measure quality of care and provide new information on the impact that treatment or interventions have on patient’s self-assessed health and health-related quality of life. We conducted a systematic review to identify which condition-specific PROMs are currently available for use in pregnancy and childbirth, and to evaluate whether these could potentially be used to assess the quality of care provided for women using maternity services. METHODS: We searched for articles relating to the use of PROMs related to care during pregnancy, childbirth, the postnatal period and women’s health more generally using PsycINFO, CINAHL, Medline and Web of Science databases as well as “grey literature”, with no date limit. Any PROM identified was reviewed with regards to development, use, and potential applicability to assess quality of maternity care provision. A narrative synthesis was used to summarise findings. RESULTS: Six papers were identified; two related to aspects of pregnancy (hyperemesis gravidarum and gestational diabetes), and four related to childbirth and the postnatal period (obstetric haemorrhage and postnatal depression). Within these papers, a total of 14 different tools were identified, which assessed a variety of aspects of physical, psychological and social health, or were generic tools, not specific to childbirth. One PROM addressed childbirth generally, however, it did not ask for or provide specific outcome measures but required women to identify and then assess what they considered the most important areas in their life affected by childbirth. CONCLUSIONS: To date, there is no PROM agreed which would be suitable as patient reported outcome measure for the assessment of the quality of care women receive during pregnancy or after childbirth. However, there are a variety of available assessment tools which could potentially be helpful in developing new and existing PROMs for maternity care. BioMed Central 2019-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6501313/ /pubmed/31060519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2318-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dickinson, Fiona
McCauley, Mary
Smith, Helen
van den Broek, Nynke
Patient reported outcome measures for use in pregnancy and childbirth: a systematic review
title Patient reported outcome measures for use in pregnancy and childbirth: a systematic review
title_full Patient reported outcome measures for use in pregnancy and childbirth: a systematic review
title_fullStr Patient reported outcome measures for use in pregnancy and childbirth: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Patient reported outcome measures for use in pregnancy and childbirth: a systematic review
title_short Patient reported outcome measures for use in pregnancy and childbirth: a systematic review
title_sort patient reported outcome measures for use in pregnancy and childbirth: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6501313/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31060519
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2318-3
work_keys_str_mv AT dickinsonfiona patientreportedoutcomemeasuresforuseinpregnancyandchildbirthasystematicreview
AT mccauleymary patientreportedoutcomemeasuresforuseinpregnancyandchildbirthasystematicreview
AT smithhelen patientreportedoutcomemeasuresforuseinpregnancyandchildbirthasystematicreview
AT vandenbroeknynke patientreportedoutcomemeasuresforuseinpregnancyandchildbirthasystematicreview