Cargando…

Quantitative capillary refill time predicts sepsis in patients with suspected infection in the emergency department: an observational study

BACKGROUND: Outcomes in emergent patients with suspected infection depend on how quickly clinicians evaluate the patients and start treatment. This study was performed to compare the predictive ability of the quantitative capillary refill time (Q-CRT) as a new rapid index versus the quick sequential...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yasufumi, Oi, Morimura, Naoto, Shirasawa, Aya, Honzawa, Hiroshi, Oyama, Yutaro, Niida, Shoko, Abe, Takeru, Imaki, Shouhei, Takeuchi, Ichiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6501379/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31080620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-019-0382-4
_version_ 1783416101280940032
author Yasufumi, Oi
Morimura, Naoto
Shirasawa, Aya
Honzawa, Hiroshi
Oyama, Yutaro
Niida, Shoko
Abe, Takeru
Imaki, Shouhei
Takeuchi, Ichiro
author_facet Yasufumi, Oi
Morimura, Naoto
Shirasawa, Aya
Honzawa, Hiroshi
Oyama, Yutaro
Niida, Shoko
Abe, Takeru
Imaki, Shouhei
Takeuchi, Ichiro
author_sort Yasufumi, Oi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Outcomes in emergent patients with suspected infection depend on how quickly clinicians evaluate the patients and start treatment. This study was performed to compare the predictive ability of the quantitative capillary refill time (Q-CRT) as a new rapid index versus the quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score and the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) score for sepsis screening in the emergency department. METHODS: This was a multicenter, observational, retrospective study of adult patients with suspected infection. The area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic curve analyses and multivariate analyses were used to explore associations of the Q-CRT with the qSOFA score, SIRS score, and lactate concentration. RESULTS: Of the 75 enrolled patients, 48 had sepsis. The AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of Q-CRT were 0.74, 58%, and 81%, respectively; those for the qSOFA score were 0.83, 66%, and 100%, respectively; those for the SIRS score were 0.61, 81%, and 40%, respectively, for SIRS score; and those for the lactate concentration were 0.76, 72%, and 81%, respectively. We found no statistically significant differences in the AUC between the scores. We then combined the Q-CRT and qSOFA score (Q-CRT/qSOFA combination) for sepsis screening. The AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of Q-CRT/qSOFA combination were 0.82, 83%, and 81%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, Q-CRT/qSOFA combination had better sensitivity than the qSOFA score alone and better specificity than the SIRS score alone. There was no significant difference in accuracy between Q-CRT/qSOFA combination and the qSOFA score or lactate concentration. The ability of the Q-CRT to predict sepsis may be similar to that of the qSOFA score or serum lactate concentration; therefore, measurement of the Q-CRT may be an alternative for invasive measurement of the blood lactate concentration in evaluating patients with suspected sepsis. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40560-019-0382-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6501379
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65013792019-05-10 Quantitative capillary refill time predicts sepsis in patients with suspected infection in the emergency department: an observational study Yasufumi, Oi Morimura, Naoto Shirasawa, Aya Honzawa, Hiroshi Oyama, Yutaro Niida, Shoko Abe, Takeru Imaki, Shouhei Takeuchi, Ichiro J Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: Outcomes in emergent patients with suspected infection depend on how quickly clinicians evaluate the patients and start treatment. This study was performed to compare the predictive ability of the quantitative capillary refill time (Q-CRT) as a new rapid index versus the quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score and the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) score for sepsis screening in the emergency department. METHODS: This was a multicenter, observational, retrospective study of adult patients with suspected infection. The area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic curve analyses and multivariate analyses were used to explore associations of the Q-CRT with the qSOFA score, SIRS score, and lactate concentration. RESULTS: Of the 75 enrolled patients, 48 had sepsis. The AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of Q-CRT were 0.74, 58%, and 81%, respectively; those for the qSOFA score were 0.83, 66%, and 100%, respectively; those for the SIRS score were 0.61, 81%, and 40%, respectively, for SIRS score; and those for the lactate concentration were 0.76, 72%, and 81%, respectively. We found no statistically significant differences in the AUC between the scores. We then combined the Q-CRT and qSOFA score (Q-CRT/qSOFA combination) for sepsis screening. The AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of Q-CRT/qSOFA combination were 0.82, 83%, and 81%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, Q-CRT/qSOFA combination had better sensitivity than the qSOFA score alone and better specificity than the SIRS score alone. There was no significant difference in accuracy between Q-CRT/qSOFA combination and the qSOFA score or lactate concentration. The ability of the Q-CRT to predict sepsis may be similar to that of the qSOFA score or serum lactate concentration; therefore, measurement of the Q-CRT may be an alternative for invasive measurement of the blood lactate concentration in evaluating patients with suspected sepsis. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40560-019-0382-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6501379/ /pubmed/31080620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-019-0382-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Yasufumi, Oi
Morimura, Naoto
Shirasawa, Aya
Honzawa, Hiroshi
Oyama, Yutaro
Niida, Shoko
Abe, Takeru
Imaki, Shouhei
Takeuchi, Ichiro
Quantitative capillary refill time predicts sepsis in patients with suspected infection in the emergency department: an observational study
title Quantitative capillary refill time predicts sepsis in patients with suspected infection in the emergency department: an observational study
title_full Quantitative capillary refill time predicts sepsis in patients with suspected infection in the emergency department: an observational study
title_fullStr Quantitative capillary refill time predicts sepsis in patients with suspected infection in the emergency department: an observational study
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative capillary refill time predicts sepsis in patients with suspected infection in the emergency department: an observational study
title_short Quantitative capillary refill time predicts sepsis in patients with suspected infection in the emergency department: an observational study
title_sort quantitative capillary refill time predicts sepsis in patients with suspected infection in the emergency department: an observational study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6501379/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31080620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-019-0382-4
work_keys_str_mv AT yasufumioi quantitativecapillaryrefilltimepredictssepsisinpatientswithsuspectedinfectionintheemergencydepartmentanobservationalstudy
AT morimuranaoto quantitativecapillaryrefilltimepredictssepsisinpatientswithsuspectedinfectionintheemergencydepartmentanobservationalstudy
AT shirasawaaya quantitativecapillaryrefilltimepredictssepsisinpatientswithsuspectedinfectionintheemergencydepartmentanobservationalstudy
AT honzawahiroshi quantitativecapillaryrefilltimepredictssepsisinpatientswithsuspectedinfectionintheemergencydepartmentanobservationalstudy
AT oyamayutaro quantitativecapillaryrefilltimepredictssepsisinpatientswithsuspectedinfectionintheemergencydepartmentanobservationalstudy
AT niidashoko quantitativecapillaryrefilltimepredictssepsisinpatientswithsuspectedinfectionintheemergencydepartmentanobservationalstudy
AT abetakeru quantitativecapillaryrefilltimepredictssepsisinpatientswithsuspectedinfectionintheemergencydepartmentanobservationalstudy
AT imakishouhei quantitativecapillaryrefilltimepredictssepsisinpatientswithsuspectedinfectionintheemergencydepartmentanobservationalstudy
AT takeuchiichiro quantitativecapillaryrefilltimepredictssepsisinpatientswithsuspectedinfectionintheemergencydepartmentanobservationalstudy