Cargando…
Oocyte cryopreservation for future fertility: comparison of ovarian response between cancer and non-cancer patients
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess whether a diagnosis of cancer interferes with ovarian function prior to the treatment of the disease. METHODS: This observational retrospective study used data from medical records of ovarian stimulation cycles performed for purposes of oocyte cryopreservation....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6501752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30875168 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20190010 |
_version_ | 1783416153304989696 |
---|---|
author | de Moraes, Camila Cruz Marinho, Victoria Furquim Werneck Campos, Ana Luísa Menezes Guedes, Janaína de Souza Xavier, Érica Becker de Sousa Caetano, João Pedro Junqueira Marinho, Ricardo Mello |
author_facet | de Moraes, Camila Cruz Marinho, Victoria Furquim Werneck Campos, Ana Luísa Menezes Guedes, Janaína de Souza Xavier, Érica Becker de Sousa Caetano, João Pedro Junqueira Marinho, Ricardo Mello |
author_sort | de Moraes, Camila Cruz |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess whether a diagnosis of cancer interferes with ovarian function prior to the treatment of the disease. METHODS: This observational retrospective study used data from medical records of ovarian stimulation cycles performed for purposes of oocyte cryopreservation. RESULTS: The included patients had a mean age of 35.13±3.72 years and 51.6% of them were aged between 36 and 40 years. More than half of the patients (57.6%) were single and 82.1% had a normal body mass index (BMI). Most women had not become pregnant (85.5%) or had babies (95.1%) or miscarriages (89.6%) prior to cryopreservation. The mean number of oocytes obtained from non-cancer patients was 11.4±8, while for cancer patients the number was 13.8±9. The mean number of frozen mature oocytes was 9.7±7 for the non-cancer group and 11.2±7.2 for the cancer group. The majority (63.1%) of the patients had up to 10 oocytes frozen per cycle. Breast cancer had the highest incidence among the included patients. There was no significant difference in ovarian response between patients with different types of cancer. CONCLUSION: The number of harvested and frozen oocytes from cancer and non-cancer patients indicated that in the two groups response to ovarian stimulation was similar. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6501752 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65017522019-05-20 Oocyte cryopreservation for future fertility: comparison of ovarian response between cancer and non-cancer patients de Moraes, Camila Cruz Marinho, Victoria Furquim Werneck Campos, Ana Luísa Menezes Guedes, Janaína de Souza Xavier, Érica Becker de Sousa Caetano, João Pedro Junqueira Marinho, Ricardo Mello JBRA Assist Reprod Original Article OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess whether a diagnosis of cancer interferes with ovarian function prior to the treatment of the disease. METHODS: This observational retrospective study used data from medical records of ovarian stimulation cycles performed for purposes of oocyte cryopreservation. RESULTS: The included patients had a mean age of 35.13±3.72 years and 51.6% of them were aged between 36 and 40 years. More than half of the patients (57.6%) were single and 82.1% had a normal body mass index (BMI). Most women had not become pregnant (85.5%) or had babies (95.1%) or miscarriages (89.6%) prior to cryopreservation. The mean number of oocytes obtained from non-cancer patients was 11.4±8, while for cancer patients the number was 13.8±9. The mean number of frozen mature oocytes was 9.7±7 for the non-cancer group and 11.2±7.2 for the cancer group. The majority (63.1%) of the patients had up to 10 oocytes frozen per cycle. Breast cancer had the highest incidence among the included patients. There was no significant difference in ovarian response between patients with different types of cancer. CONCLUSION: The number of harvested and frozen oocytes from cancer and non-cancer patients indicated that in the two groups response to ovarian stimulation was similar. Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6501752/ /pubmed/30875168 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20190010 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article de Moraes, Camila Cruz Marinho, Victoria Furquim Werneck Campos, Ana Luísa Menezes Guedes, Janaína de Souza Xavier, Érica Becker de Sousa Caetano, João Pedro Junqueira Marinho, Ricardo Mello Oocyte cryopreservation for future fertility: comparison of ovarian response between cancer and non-cancer patients |
title | Oocyte cryopreservation for future fertility: comparison of ovarian
response between cancer and non-cancer patients |
title_full | Oocyte cryopreservation for future fertility: comparison of ovarian
response between cancer and non-cancer patients |
title_fullStr | Oocyte cryopreservation for future fertility: comparison of ovarian
response between cancer and non-cancer patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Oocyte cryopreservation for future fertility: comparison of ovarian
response between cancer and non-cancer patients |
title_short | Oocyte cryopreservation for future fertility: comparison of ovarian
response between cancer and non-cancer patients |
title_sort | oocyte cryopreservation for future fertility: comparison of ovarian
response between cancer and non-cancer patients |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6501752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30875168 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20190010 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT demoraescamilacruz oocytecryopreservationforfuturefertilitycomparisonofovarianresponsebetweencancerandnoncancerpatients AT marinhovictoriafurquimwerneck oocytecryopreservationforfuturefertilitycomparisonofovarianresponsebetweencancerandnoncancerpatients AT camposanaluisamenezes oocytecryopreservationforfuturefertilitycomparisonofovarianresponsebetweencancerandnoncancerpatients AT guedesjanainadesouza oocytecryopreservationforfuturefertilitycomparisonofovarianresponsebetweencancerandnoncancerpatients AT xavierericabeckerdesousa oocytecryopreservationforfuturefertilitycomparisonofovarianresponsebetweencancerandnoncancerpatients AT caetanojoaopedrojunqueira oocytecryopreservationforfuturefertilitycomparisonofovarianresponsebetweencancerandnoncancerpatients AT marinhoricardomello oocytecryopreservationforfuturefertilitycomparisonofovarianresponsebetweencancerandnoncancerpatients |