Cargando…

Oocyte cryopreservation for future fertility: comparison of ovarian response between cancer and non-cancer patients

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess whether a diagnosis of cancer interferes with ovarian function prior to the treatment of the disease. METHODS: This observational retrospective study used data from medical records of ovarian stimulation cycles performed for purposes of oocyte cryopreservation....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Moraes, Camila Cruz, Marinho, Victoria Furquim Werneck, Campos, Ana Luísa Menezes, Guedes, Janaína de Souza, Xavier, Érica Becker de Sousa, Caetano, João Pedro Junqueira, Marinho, Ricardo Mello
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6501752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30875168
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20190010
_version_ 1783416153304989696
author de Moraes, Camila Cruz
Marinho, Victoria Furquim Werneck
Campos, Ana Luísa Menezes
Guedes, Janaína de Souza
Xavier, Érica Becker de Sousa
Caetano, João Pedro Junqueira
Marinho, Ricardo Mello
author_facet de Moraes, Camila Cruz
Marinho, Victoria Furquim Werneck
Campos, Ana Luísa Menezes
Guedes, Janaína de Souza
Xavier, Érica Becker de Sousa
Caetano, João Pedro Junqueira
Marinho, Ricardo Mello
author_sort de Moraes, Camila Cruz
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess whether a diagnosis of cancer interferes with ovarian function prior to the treatment of the disease. METHODS: This observational retrospective study used data from medical records of ovarian stimulation cycles performed for purposes of oocyte cryopreservation. RESULTS: The included patients had a mean age of 35.13±3.72 years and 51.6% of them were aged between 36 and 40 years. More than half of the patients (57.6%) were single and 82.1% had a normal body mass index (BMI). Most women had not become pregnant (85.5%) or had babies (95.1%) or miscarriages (89.6%) prior to cryopreservation. The mean number of oocytes obtained from non-cancer patients was 11.4±8, while for cancer patients the number was 13.8±9. The mean number of frozen mature oocytes was 9.7±7 for the non-cancer group and 11.2±7.2 for the cancer group. The majority (63.1%) of the patients had up to 10 oocytes frozen per cycle. Breast cancer had the highest incidence among the included patients. There was no significant difference in ovarian response between patients with different types of cancer. CONCLUSION: The number of harvested and frozen oocytes from cancer and non-cancer patients indicated that in the two groups response to ovarian stimulation was similar.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6501752
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65017522019-05-20 Oocyte cryopreservation for future fertility: comparison of ovarian response between cancer and non-cancer patients de Moraes, Camila Cruz Marinho, Victoria Furquim Werneck Campos, Ana Luísa Menezes Guedes, Janaína de Souza Xavier, Érica Becker de Sousa Caetano, João Pedro Junqueira Marinho, Ricardo Mello JBRA Assist Reprod Original Article OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess whether a diagnosis of cancer interferes with ovarian function prior to the treatment of the disease. METHODS: This observational retrospective study used data from medical records of ovarian stimulation cycles performed for purposes of oocyte cryopreservation. RESULTS: The included patients had a mean age of 35.13±3.72 years and 51.6% of them were aged between 36 and 40 years. More than half of the patients (57.6%) were single and 82.1% had a normal body mass index (BMI). Most women had not become pregnant (85.5%) or had babies (95.1%) or miscarriages (89.6%) prior to cryopreservation. The mean number of oocytes obtained from non-cancer patients was 11.4±8, while for cancer patients the number was 13.8±9. The mean number of frozen mature oocytes was 9.7±7 for the non-cancer group and 11.2±7.2 for the cancer group. The majority (63.1%) of the patients had up to 10 oocytes frozen per cycle. Breast cancer had the highest incidence among the included patients. There was no significant difference in ovarian response between patients with different types of cancer. CONCLUSION: The number of harvested and frozen oocytes from cancer and non-cancer patients indicated that in the two groups response to ovarian stimulation was similar. Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6501752/ /pubmed/30875168 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20190010 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
de Moraes, Camila Cruz
Marinho, Victoria Furquim Werneck
Campos, Ana Luísa Menezes
Guedes, Janaína de Souza
Xavier, Érica Becker de Sousa
Caetano, João Pedro Junqueira
Marinho, Ricardo Mello
Oocyte cryopreservation for future fertility: comparison of ovarian response between cancer and non-cancer patients
title Oocyte cryopreservation for future fertility: comparison of ovarian response between cancer and non-cancer patients
title_full Oocyte cryopreservation for future fertility: comparison of ovarian response between cancer and non-cancer patients
title_fullStr Oocyte cryopreservation for future fertility: comparison of ovarian response between cancer and non-cancer patients
title_full_unstemmed Oocyte cryopreservation for future fertility: comparison of ovarian response between cancer and non-cancer patients
title_short Oocyte cryopreservation for future fertility: comparison of ovarian response between cancer and non-cancer patients
title_sort oocyte cryopreservation for future fertility: comparison of ovarian response between cancer and non-cancer patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6501752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30875168
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20190010
work_keys_str_mv AT demoraescamilacruz oocytecryopreservationforfuturefertilitycomparisonofovarianresponsebetweencancerandnoncancerpatients
AT marinhovictoriafurquimwerneck oocytecryopreservationforfuturefertilitycomparisonofovarianresponsebetweencancerandnoncancerpatients
AT camposanaluisamenezes oocytecryopreservationforfuturefertilitycomparisonofovarianresponsebetweencancerandnoncancerpatients
AT guedesjanainadesouza oocytecryopreservationforfuturefertilitycomparisonofovarianresponsebetweencancerandnoncancerpatients
AT xavierericabeckerdesousa oocytecryopreservationforfuturefertilitycomparisonofovarianresponsebetweencancerandnoncancerpatients
AT caetanojoaopedrojunqueira oocytecryopreservationforfuturefertilitycomparisonofovarianresponsebetweencancerandnoncancerpatients
AT marinhoricardomello oocytecryopreservationforfuturefertilitycomparisonofovarianresponsebetweencancerandnoncancerpatients