Cargando…
An Insect Counteradaptation against Host Plant Defenses Evolved through Concerted Neofunctionalization
Antagonistic chemical interactions between herbivorous insects and their host plants are often thought to coevolve in a stepwise process, with an evolutionary innovation on one side being countered by a corresponding advance on the other. Glucosinolate sulfatase (GSS) enzyme activity is essential fo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6501874/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30715408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msz019 |
_version_ | 1783416164182917120 |
---|---|
author | Heidel-Fischer, Hanna M Kirsch, Roy Reichelt, Michael Ahn, Seung-Joon Wielsch, Natalie Baxter, Simon W Heckel, David G Vogel, Heiko Kroymann, Juergen |
author_facet | Heidel-Fischer, Hanna M Kirsch, Roy Reichelt, Michael Ahn, Seung-Joon Wielsch, Natalie Baxter, Simon W Heckel, David G Vogel, Heiko Kroymann, Juergen |
author_sort | Heidel-Fischer, Hanna M |
collection | PubMed |
description | Antagonistic chemical interactions between herbivorous insects and their host plants are often thought to coevolve in a stepwise process, with an evolutionary innovation on one side being countered by a corresponding advance on the other. Glucosinolate sulfatase (GSS) enzyme activity is essential for the Diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella, to overcome a highly diversified secondary metabolite-based host defense system in the Brassicales. GSS genes are located in an ancient cluster of arylsulfataselike genes, but the exact roles of gene copies and their evolutionary trajectories are unknown. Here, we combine a functional investigation of duplicated insect arylsulfatases with an analysis of associated nucleotide substitution patterns. We show that the Diamondback moth genome encodes three GSSs with distinct substrate spectra and distinct expression patterns in response to glucosinolates. Contrary to our expectations, early functional diversification of gene copies was not indicative of a coevolutionary arms race between host and herbivore. Instead, both copies of a duplicated arylsulfatase gene evolved concertedly in the context of an insect host shift to acquire novel detoxifying functions under positive selection, a pattern of duplicate gene retention that we call “concerted neofunctionalization.” |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6501874 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65018742019-05-08 An Insect Counteradaptation against Host Plant Defenses Evolved through Concerted Neofunctionalization Heidel-Fischer, Hanna M Kirsch, Roy Reichelt, Michael Ahn, Seung-Joon Wielsch, Natalie Baxter, Simon W Heckel, David G Vogel, Heiko Kroymann, Juergen Mol Biol Evol Discoveries Antagonistic chemical interactions between herbivorous insects and their host plants are often thought to coevolve in a stepwise process, with an evolutionary innovation on one side being countered by a corresponding advance on the other. Glucosinolate sulfatase (GSS) enzyme activity is essential for the Diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella, to overcome a highly diversified secondary metabolite-based host defense system in the Brassicales. GSS genes are located in an ancient cluster of arylsulfataselike genes, but the exact roles of gene copies and their evolutionary trajectories are unknown. Here, we combine a functional investigation of duplicated insect arylsulfatases with an analysis of associated nucleotide substitution patterns. We show that the Diamondback moth genome encodes three GSSs with distinct substrate spectra and distinct expression patterns in response to glucosinolates. Contrary to our expectations, early functional diversification of gene copies was not indicative of a coevolutionary arms race between host and herbivore. Instead, both copies of a duplicated arylsulfatase gene evolved concertedly in the context of an insect host shift to acquire novel detoxifying functions under positive selection, a pattern of duplicate gene retention that we call “concerted neofunctionalization.” Oxford University Press 2019-05 2019-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6501874/ /pubmed/30715408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msz019 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Discoveries Heidel-Fischer, Hanna M Kirsch, Roy Reichelt, Michael Ahn, Seung-Joon Wielsch, Natalie Baxter, Simon W Heckel, David G Vogel, Heiko Kroymann, Juergen An Insect Counteradaptation against Host Plant Defenses Evolved through Concerted Neofunctionalization |
title | An Insect Counteradaptation against Host Plant Defenses Evolved through Concerted Neofunctionalization |
title_full | An Insect Counteradaptation against Host Plant Defenses Evolved through Concerted Neofunctionalization |
title_fullStr | An Insect Counteradaptation against Host Plant Defenses Evolved through Concerted Neofunctionalization |
title_full_unstemmed | An Insect Counteradaptation against Host Plant Defenses Evolved through Concerted Neofunctionalization |
title_short | An Insect Counteradaptation against Host Plant Defenses Evolved through Concerted Neofunctionalization |
title_sort | insect counteradaptation against host plant defenses evolved through concerted neofunctionalization |
topic | Discoveries |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6501874/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30715408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msz019 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heidelfischerhannam aninsectcounteradaptationagainsthostplantdefensesevolvedthroughconcertedneofunctionalization AT kirschroy aninsectcounteradaptationagainsthostplantdefensesevolvedthroughconcertedneofunctionalization AT reicheltmichael aninsectcounteradaptationagainsthostplantdefensesevolvedthroughconcertedneofunctionalization AT ahnseungjoon aninsectcounteradaptationagainsthostplantdefensesevolvedthroughconcertedneofunctionalization AT wielschnatalie aninsectcounteradaptationagainsthostplantdefensesevolvedthroughconcertedneofunctionalization AT baxtersimonw aninsectcounteradaptationagainsthostplantdefensesevolvedthroughconcertedneofunctionalization AT heckeldavidg aninsectcounteradaptationagainsthostplantdefensesevolvedthroughconcertedneofunctionalization AT vogelheiko aninsectcounteradaptationagainsthostplantdefensesevolvedthroughconcertedneofunctionalization AT kroymannjuergen aninsectcounteradaptationagainsthostplantdefensesevolvedthroughconcertedneofunctionalization AT heidelfischerhannam insectcounteradaptationagainsthostplantdefensesevolvedthroughconcertedneofunctionalization AT kirschroy insectcounteradaptationagainsthostplantdefensesevolvedthroughconcertedneofunctionalization AT reicheltmichael insectcounteradaptationagainsthostplantdefensesevolvedthroughconcertedneofunctionalization AT ahnseungjoon insectcounteradaptationagainsthostplantdefensesevolvedthroughconcertedneofunctionalization AT wielschnatalie insectcounteradaptationagainsthostplantdefensesevolvedthroughconcertedneofunctionalization AT baxtersimonw insectcounteradaptationagainsthostplantdefensesevolvedthroughconcertedneofunctionalization AT heckeldavidg insectcounteradaptationagainsthostplantdefensesevolvedthroughconcertedneofunctionalization AT vogelheiko insectcounteradaptationagainsthostplantdefensesevolvedthroughconcertedneofunctionalization AT kroymannjuergen insectcounteradaptationagainsthostplantdefensesevolvedthroughconcertedneofunctionalization |