Cargando…

Comparative effectiveness and safety of low-strength and high-strength direct oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin: a sequential cohort study

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare effectiveness and safety of low-strength and high-strength direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) with warfarin in the Australian Veteran population. DESIGN: Sequential cohort study using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and propensity sc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pratt, Nicole L, Ramsay, Emmae, Kalisch Ellett, Lisa M, Duszynski, Katherine, Shakib, Sepehr, Kerr, Mhairi, Caughey, Gillian, Roughead, Elizabeth Ellen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6501958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31061039
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026486
_version_ 1783416173176553472
author Pratt, Nicole L
Ramsay, Emmae
Kalisch Ellett, Lisa M
Duszynski, Katherine
Shakib, Sepehr
Kerr, Mhairi
Caughey, Gillian
Roughead, Elizabeth Ellen
author_facet Pratt, Nicole L
Ramsay, Emmae
Kalisch Ellett, Lisa M
Duszynski, Katherine
Shakib, Sepehr
Kerr, Mhairi
Caughey, Gillian
Roughead, Elizabeth Ellen
author_sort Pratt, Nicole L
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare effectiveness and safety of low-strength and high-strength direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) with warfarin in the Australian Veteran population. DESIGN: Sequential cohort study using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and propensity score matching. Initiators of high-strength (apixaban 5 mg, dabigatran 150 mg, rivaroxaban 20 mg) and low-strength DOACS (apixaban 2.5 mg, dabigatran 110 mg, rivaroxaban 15 mg) were compared with warfarin initiators. SETTING: Australian Government Department of Veterans’ Affairs claims database. PARTICIPANTS: 4836 patients who initiated oral anticoagulants (45.8%, 26.0% and 28.2% on low-strength, high-strength DOACs and warfarin, respectively) between August 2013 and March 2015. Mean age was 85, 75 and 83 years for low-strength, high-strength DOACs and warfarin initiators, respectively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: One-year risk of hospitalisation for ischaemic stroke, any bleeding event or haemorrhagic stroke. Secondary outcomes were 1-year risk of hospitalisation for myocardial infarction and death. RESULTS: Using the IPTW method, no difference in risk of ischaemic stroke or bleeding was found with low-strength DOACs compared with warfarin. As a class, no increased risk of myocardial infarction was found for low-strength DOACs, however, risk was elevated for apixaban (HR 2.25, 95% CI 1.23 to 4.13). For high-strength DOACs, no difference was found for ischaemic stroke compared with warfarin, however, there was a significant reduction in risk of bleeding events (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.89) and death (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.58). Propensity score matching showed no difference in risk of ischaemic stroke or bleeding. CONCLUSION: We found that in the practice setting both DOAC formulations were similar to warfarin with regard to effectiveness and had no increased risk of bleeding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6501958
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65019582019-05-21 Comparative effectiveness and safety of low-strength and high-strength direct oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin: a sequential cohort study Pratt, Nicole L Ramsay, Emmae Kalisch Ellett, Lisa M Duszynski, Katherine Shakib, Sepehr Kerr, Mhairi Caughey, Gillian Roughead, Elizabeth Ellen BMJ Open Cardiovascular Medicine OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare effectiveness and safety of low-strength and high-strength direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) with warfarin in the Australian Veteran population. DESIGN: Sequential cohort study using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and propensity score matching. Initiators of high-strength (apixaban 5 mg, dabigatran 150 mg, rivaroxaban 20 mg) and low-strength DOACS (apixaban 2.5 mg, dabigatran 110 mg, rivaroxaban 15 mg) were compared with warfarin initiators. SETTING: Australian Government Department of Veterans’ Affairs claims database. PARTICIPANTS: 4836 patients who initiated oral anticoagulants (45.8%, 26.0% and 28.2% on low-strength, high-strength DOACs and warfarin, respectively) between August 2013 and March 2015. Mean age was 85, 75 and 83 years for low-strength, high-strength DOACs and warfarin initiators, respectively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: One-year risk of hospitalisation for ischaemic stroke, any bleeding event or haemorrhagic stroke. Secondary outcomes were 1-year risk of hospitalisation for myocardial infarction and death. RESULTS: Using the IPTW method, no difference in risk of ischaemic stroke or bleeding was found with low-strength DOACs compared with warfarin. As a class, no increased risk of myocardial infarction was found for low-strength DOACs, however, risk was elevated for apixaban (HR 2.25, 95% CI 1.23 to 4.13). For high-strength DOACs, no difference was found for ischaemic stroke compared with warfarin, however, there was a significant reduction in risk of bleeding events (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.89) and death (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.58). Propensity score matching showed no difference in risk of ischaemic stroke or bleeding. CONCLUSION: We found that in the practice setting both DOAC formulations were similar to warfarin with regard to effectiveness and had no increased risk of bleeding. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6501958/ /pubmed/31061039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026486 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Pratt, Nicole L
Ramsay, Emmae
Kalisch Ellett, Lisa M
Duszynski, Katherine
Shakib, Sepehr
Kerr, Mhairi
Caughey, Gillian
Roughead, Elizabeth Ellen
Comparative effectiveness and safety of low-strength and high-strength direct oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin: a sequential cohort study
title Comparative effectiveness and safety of low-strength and high-strength direct oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin: a sequential cohort study
title_full Comparative effectiveness and safety of low-strength and high-strength direct oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin: a sequential cohort study
title_fullStr Comparative effectiveness and safety of low-strength and high-strength direct oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin: a sequential cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative effectiveness and safety of low-strength and high-strength direct oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin: a sequential cohort study
title_short Comparative effectiveness and safety of low-strength and high-strength direct oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin: a sequential cohort study
title_sort comparative effectiveness and safety of low-strength and high-strength direct oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin: a sequential cohort study
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6501958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31061039
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026486
work_keys_str_mv AT prattnicolel comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyoflowstrengthandhighstrengthdirectoralanticoagulantscomparedwithwarfarinasequentialcohortstudy
AT ramsayemmae comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyoflowstrengthandhighstrengthdirectoralanticoagulantscomparedwithwarfarinasequentialcohortstudy
AT kalischellettlisam comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyoflowstrengthandhighstrengthdirectoralanticoagulantscomparedwithwarfarinasequentialcohortstudy
AT duszynskikatherine comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyoflowstrengthandhighstrengthdirectoralanticoagulantscomparedwithwarfarinasequentialcohortstudy
AT shakibsepehr comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyoflowstrengthandhighstrengthdirectoralanticoagulantscomparedwithwarfarinasequentialcohortstudy
AT kerrmhairi comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyoflowstrengthandhighstrengthdirectoralanticoagulantscomparedwithwarfarinasequentialcohortstudy
AT caugheygillian comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyoflowstrengthandhighstrengthdirectoralanticoagulantscomparedwithwarfarinasequentialcohortstudy
AT rougheadelizabethellen comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyoflowstrengthandhighstrengthdirectoralanticoagulantscomparedwithwarfarinasequentialcohortstudy